Serveur d'exploration sur le confinement (PubMed)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Challenges and impact of COVID-19 lockdown on Indian optometry practice: A survey-based study.

Identifieur interne : 000368 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000367; suivant : 000369

Challenges and impact of COVID-19 lockdown on Indian optometry practice: A survey-based study.

Auteurs : Siddharth K Karthikeyan ; Pooja Nandagopal ; Vivek Suganthan R ; Anush Nayak

Source :

RBID : pubmed:33414101

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Indian government announced a nationwide lockdown as a preventive measure to control the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic. This survey was developed and conducted to assess the impact of lockdown on Indian optometry practice.

METHODS

A survey questionnaire was designed and circulated across the optometrists practicing in India through multiple social media platforms. All the data were extracted and only valid response were analyzed and reported.

RESULTS

A total of 691 optometrists participated in the survey. Most of the participants (22.25%) were in private practice followed by academics (14.89%). Among the valid responses collected, it was found that 43.37% of the respondents were consulting patients during the lockdown. Of these, 27.17% of optometrists were examining infectious cases and 48.68% were examining all the patients who came for consultation. Approximately 50.94% of the participated optometrist had begun telephonic/e‑mail/video consultations. In addition, 64.48% reported that optometrists were at an equal risk of clinching COVID‑19 on comparison with other domains during patient examination. Nearly 30.44% respondents felt that optometrists would face challenges in approaching the patient post COVID-19 considering the close working distance.

CONCLUSION

A proportion of optometrist have switched to some form of teleconsultation in order to aid patients during this prevailing pandemic. Regulatory bodies should issue appropriate guidelines regarding the safe optometry practice for the betterment of both patient and practitioners during face-to-face consultation.


DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.10.006
PubMed: 33414101
PubMed Central: PMC7762711

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:33414101

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Challenges and impact of COVID-19 lockdown on Indian optometry practice: A survey-based study.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="K Karthikeyan, Siddharth" sort="K Karthikeyan, Siddharth" uniqKey="K Karthikeyan S" first="Siddharth" last="K Karthikeyan">Siddharth K Karthikeyan</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Netha Jyothi college of Optometry, Udupi, Karnataka, India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nandagopal, Pooja" sort="Nandagopal, Pooja" uniqKey="Nandagopal P" first="Pooja" last="Nandagopal">Pooja Nandagopal</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professional, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="R, Vivek Suganthan" sort="R, Vivek Suganthan" uniqKey="R V" first="Vivek Suganthan" last="R">Vivek Suganthan R</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professional, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. Electronic address: viveksuganthan@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nayak, Anush" sort="Nayak, Anush" uniqKey="Nayak A" first="Anush" last="Nayak">Anush Nayak</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Netha Jyothi college of Optometry, Udupi, Karnataka, India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2020">2020</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:33414101</idno>
<idno type="pmid">33414101</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.optom.2020.10.006</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC7762711</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000368</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000368</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Challenges and impact of COVID-19 lockdown on Indian optometry practice: A survey-based study.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="K Karthikeyan, Siddharth" sort="K Karthikeyan, Siddharth" uniqKey="K Karthikeyan S" first="Siddharth" last="K Karthikeyan">Siddharth K Karthikeyan</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Netha Jyothi college of Optometry, Udupi, Karnataka, India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nandagopal, Pooja" sort="Nandagopal, Pooja" uniqKey="Nandagopal P" first="Pooja" last="Nandagopal">Pooja Nandagopal</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professional, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="R, Vivek Suganthan" sort="R, Vivek Suganthan" uniqKey="R V" first="Vivek Suganthan" last="R">Vivek Suganthan R</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professional, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. Electronic address: viveksuganthan@gmail.com.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nayak, Anush" sort="Nayak, Anush" uniqKey="Nayak A" first="Anush" last="Nayak">Anush Nayak</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Optometry, Netha Jyothi college of Optometry, Udupi, Karnataka, India.</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of optometry</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1989-1342</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2020" type="published">2020</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>PURPOSE</b>
</p>
<p>The Indian government announced a nationwide lockdown as a preventive measure to control the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic. This survey was developed and conducted to assess the impact of lockdown on Indian optometry practice.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>METHODS</b>
</p>
<p>A survey questionnaire was designed and circulated across the optometrists practicing in India through multiple social media platforms. All the data were extracted and only valid response were analyzed and reported.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>RESULTS</b>
</p>
<p>A total of 691 optometrists participated in the survey. Most of the participants (22.25%) were in private practice followed by academics (14.89%). Among the valid responses collected, it was found that 43.37% of the respondents were consulting patients during the lockdown. Of these, 27.17% of optometrists were examining infectious cases and 48.68% were examining all the patients who came for consultation. Approximately 50.94% of the participated optometrist had begun telephonic/e‑mail/video consultations. In addition, 64.48% reported that optometrists were at an equal risk of clinching COVID‑19 on comparison with other domains during patient examination. Nearly 30.44% respondents felt that optometrists would face challenges in approaching the patient post COVID-19 considering the close working distance.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>CONCLUSION</b>
</p>
<p>A proportion of optometrist have switched to some form of teleconsultation in order to aid patients during this prevailing pandemic. Regulatory bodies should issue appropriate guidelines regarding the safe optometry practice for the betterment of both patient and practitioners during face-to-face consultation.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="Publisher" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">33414101</PMID>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2021</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>11</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1989-1342</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<PubDate>
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>Dec</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of optometry</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Optom</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Challenges and impact of COVID-19 lockdown on Indian optometry practice: A survey-based study.</ArticleTitle>
<ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S1888-4296(20)30133-3</ELocationID>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.optom.2020.10.006</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The Indian government announced a nationwide lockdown as a preventive measure to control the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic. This survey was developed and conducted to assess the impact of lockdown on Indian optometry practice.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A survey questionnaire was designed and circulated across the optometrists practicing in India through multiple social media platforms. All the data were extracted and only valid response were analyzed and reported.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">A total of 691 optometrists participated in the survey. Most of the participants (22.25%) were in private practice followed by academics (14.89%). Among the valid responses collected, it was found that 43.37% of the respondents were consulting patients during the lockdown. Of these, 27.17% of optometrists were examining infectious cases and 48.68% were examining all the patients who came for consultation. Approximately 50.94% of the participated optometrist had begun telephonic/e‑mail/video consultations. In addition, 64.48% reported that optometrists were at an equal risk of clinching COVID‑19 on comparison with other domains during patient examination. Nearly 30.44% respondents felt that optometrists would face challenges in approaching the patient post COVID-19 considering the close working distance.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">A proportion of optometrist have switched to some form of teleconsultation in order to aid patients during this prevailing pandemic. Regulatory bodies should issue appropriate guidelines regarding the safe optometry practice for the betterment of both patient and practitioners during face-to-face consultation.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2020 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>K Karthikeyan</LastName>
<ForeName>Siddharth</ForeName>
<Initials>S</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Optometry, Netha Jyothi college of Optometry, Udupi, Karnataka, India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Nandagopal</LastName>
<ForeName>Pooja</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professional, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>R</LastName>
<ForeName>Vivek Suganthan</ForeName>
<Initials>VS</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professional, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. Electronic address: viveksuganthan@gmail.com.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Nayak</LastName>
<ForeName>Anush</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Optometry, Netha Jyothi college of Optometry, Udupi, Karnataka, India.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Spain</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Optom</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101482903</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1989-1342</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM">
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Business continuity</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">COVID-19</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Online education</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Optometry practice</Keyword>
<Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Tele-optometry</Keyword>
</KeywordList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2020</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2021</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>8</Day>
<Hour>5</Hour>
<Minute>54</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2021</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2021</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>9</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>aheadofprint</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">33414101</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S1888-4296(20)30133-3</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.optom.2020.10.006</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7762711</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Can Fam Physician. 2006 Oct;52(10):1229-32</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17279182</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 May;39(3):194-204</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30957274</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Med Virol. 2020 Jun;92(6):589-594</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32100876</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;68(5):725-730</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32317434</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Jul;103(4):501-506</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31773810</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Nurs Stand. 2020 Apr 29;35(5):45-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32337862</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Nov 3;5(6):2</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27847689</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 10;10:2054</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31551886</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 8;21(11):e14808</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31702560</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Sep 13;8(5):13</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31579557</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Biosecur Bioterror. 2006;4(3):307-12</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16999592</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 08;6(15):eaay5324</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32284995</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 May;258(5):1049-1055</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32124000</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19886379</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 May;98(3):221-222</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32223068</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jun;18(5):382-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22500741</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ophthalmology. 2020 Jul;127(7):977-979</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32291098</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31986257</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;68(4):549-553</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32174565</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jul;96(1137):422-423</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32300058</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb 10;10:285-95</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26929592</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Eye (Lond). 2020 Jul;34(7):1206-1211</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32424327</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Optometry. 2007 Dec;78(12):629-43</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18054133</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;182:147-154</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28844641</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 May 1;138(5):575-578</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32232433</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep-Oct;60(5):401-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22944749</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 May;98(3):e388</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32189463</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 8;8(1):19</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">30766761</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15471760</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):e39</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32035510</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Optom. 2020 Oct - Dec;13(4):216-226</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32703749</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;68(5):711-724</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32317433</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Oman J Ophthalmol. 2019 May-Aug;12(2):73-77</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">31198290</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(2):88-91</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16539756</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Optom Vis Sci. 2015 May;92(5):615-22</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25875681</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;190:9-16</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29550190</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Jun;43(3):204-207</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32336578</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32182409</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Infect. 2020 Aug;81(2):e122-e123</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">32474035</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/LockdownV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000368 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000368 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    LockdownV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:33414101
   |texte=   Challenges and impact of COVID-19 lockdown on Indian optometry practice: A survey-based study.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:33414101" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LockdownV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38.
Data generation: Sun Jan 31 08:28:27 2021. Site generation: Sun Jan 31 08:33:49 2021