Serveur d'exploration sur la grippe aux Pays-Bas

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.

Identifieur interne : 000098 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000097; suivant : 000099

ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.

Auteurs : Linda H Rmark [Pays-Bas] ; Florence Van Hunsel ; Birgitta Grundmark

Source :

RBID : pubmed:25627832

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has existed in several countries for decades, but throughout Europe the role of consumers as a source of information on ADRs has not been fully accepted until recently. In Europe, The Netherlands and Sweden were among the first countries to implement consumer reporting well before it was mandated by law throughout the EU. Consumer reporting is an integral part of the spontaneous reporting systems in both The Netherlands and Sweden, with yearly numbers of reports constantly increasing. Consumer reporting forms and handling procedures are essentially the same as for healthcare professional reporting; the message in the reports, not the type of messenger, is what is of importance. Studies have established the significant contribution of consumer reporting to ADR signal detection. Combining all reports regardless of reporter type is recommended since it yields the largest critical mass of reports for signal detection. Examples of signals where consumer reports have been of crucial importance for signal detection are electric shock-like sensations associated with the use of duloxetine, and persistent sexual dysfunction after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. An example of consumer reporting significantly strengthening a detected signal is Pandemrix(®) (influenza H1N1 vaccine)-induced narcolepsy. Raising public awareness of ADR reporting is important, but time- and resource-consuming. The minimum effort taken should be to passively inform consumers, e.g. via stakeholders' homepages and via drug product information leaflets. Another possibility of reaching out to this target group could be through co-operation with other (non-government) organizations. Information from consumer reports may give a new perspective on ADRs via the consumers' unfiltered experiences. Consumers' views may change the way the benefit-harm balance of drugs is perceived and assessed today, and, being the ultimate users of drugs, consumers could have a relevant influence in the regulatory decision-making processes for drugs. All stakeholders in pharmacovigilance should embrace this new valuable source of information.

DOI: 10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1
PubMed: 25627832

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:25627832

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="H Rmark, Linda" sort="H Rmark, Linda" uniqKey="H Rmark L" first="Linda" last="H Rmark">Linda H Rmark</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, WHO Collaborating Centre in Pharmacovigilance for Education and Patient Reporting, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, l.harmark@lareb.nl.</nlm:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, WHO Collaborating Centre in Pharmacovigilance for Education and Patient Reporting, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Hunsel, Florence" sort="Van Hunsel, Florence" uniqKey="Van Hunsel F" first="Florence" last="Van Hunsel">Florence Van Hunsel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Grundmark, Birgitta" sort="Grundmark, Birgitta" uniqKey="Grundmark B" first="Birgitta" last="Grundmark">Birgitta Grundmark</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2015">2015</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:25627832</idno>
<idno type="pmid">25627832</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000098</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000098</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000098</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000098</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="H Rmark, Linda" sort="H Rmark, Linda" uniqKey="H Rmark L" first="Linda" last="H Rmark">Linda H Rmark</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, WHO Collaborating Centre in Pharmacovigilance for Education and Patient Reporting, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, l.harmark@lareb.nl.</nlm:affiliation>
<country wicri:rule="url">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, WHO Collaborating Centre in Pharmacovigilance for Education and Patient Reporting, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Hunsel, Florence" sort="Van Hunsel, Florence" uniqKey="Van Hunsel F" first="Florence" last="Van Hunsel">Florence Van Hunsel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Grundmark, Birgitta" sort="Grundmark, Birgitta" uniqKey="Grundmark B" first="Birgitta" last="Grundmark">Birgitta Grundmark</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Drug safety</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1179-1942</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2015" type="published">2015</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Community Participation (MeSH)</term>
<term>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions (epidemiology)</term>
<term>Humans (MeSH)</term>
<term>Netherlands (MeSH)</term>
<term>Pharmacovigilance (MeSH)</term>
<term>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing (methods)</term>
<term>Sweden (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments (épidémiologie)</term>
<term>Humains (MeSH)</term>
<term>Participation communautaire (MeSH)</term>
<term>Pays-Bas (MeSH)</term>
<term>Pharmacovigilance (MeSH)</term>
<term>Surveillance post-commercialisation des produits de santé (méthodes)</term>
<term>Suède (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en">
<term>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Surveillance post-commercialisation des produits de santé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Effets secondaires indésirables des médicaments</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Community Participation</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Netherlands</term>
<term>Pharmacovigilance</term>
<term>Sweden</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Participation communautaire</term>
<term>Pays-Bas</term>
<term>Pharmacovigilance</term>
<term>Suède</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has existed in several countries for decades, but throughout Europe the role of consumers as a source of information on ADRs has not been fully accepted until recently. In Europe, The Netherlands and Sweden were among the first countries to implement consumer reporting well before it was mandated by law throughout the EU. Consumer reporting is an integral part of the spontaneous reporting systems in both The Netherlands and Sweden, with yearly numbers of reports constantly increasing. Consumer reporting forms and handling procedures are essentially the same as for healthcare professional reporting; the message in the reports, not the type of messenger, is what is of importance. Studies have established the significant contribution of consumer reporting to ADR signal detection. Combining all reports regardless of reporter type is recommended since it yields the largest critical mass of reports for signal detection. Examples of signals where consumer reports have been of crucial importance for signal detection are electric shock-like sensations associated with the use of duloxetine, and persistent sexual dysfunction after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. An example of consumer reporting significantly strengthening a detected signal is Pandemrix(®) (influenza H1N1 vaccine)-induced narcolepsy. Raising public awareness of ADR reporting is important, but time- and resource-consuming. The minimum effort taken should be to passively inform consumers, e.g. via stakeholders' homepages and via drug product information leaflets. Another possibility of reaching out to this target group could be through co-operation with other (non-government) organizations. Information from consumer reports may give a new perspective on ADRs via the consumers' unfiltered experiences. Consumers' views may change the way the benefit-harm balance of drugs is perceived and assessed today, and, being the ultimate users of drugs, consumers could have a relevant influence in the regulatory decision-making processes for drugs. All stakeholders in pharmacovigilance should embrace this new valuable source of information. </div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">25627832</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>25</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1179-1942</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>38</Volume>
<Issue>4</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>Apr</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Drug safety</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Drug Saf</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>337-47</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has existed in several countries for decades, but throughout Europe the role of consumers as a source of information on ADRs has not been fully accepted until recently. In Europe, The Netherlands and Sweden were among the first countries to implement consumer reporting well before it was mandated by law throughout the EU. Consumer reporting is an integral part of the spontaneous reporting systems in both The Netherlands and Sweden, with yearly numbers of reports constantly increasing. Consumer reporting forms and handling procedures are essentially the same as for healthcare professional reporting; the message in the reports, not the type of messenger, is what is of importance. Studies have established the significant contribution of consumer reporting to ADR signal detection. Combining all reports regardless of reporter type is recommended since it yields the largest critical mass of reports for signal detection. Examples of signals where consumer reports have been of crucial importance for signal detection are electric shock-like sensations associated with the use of duloxetine, and persistent sexual dysfunction after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. An example of consumer reporting significantly strengthening a detected signal is Pandemrix(®) (influenza H1N1 vaccine)-induced narcolepsy. Raising public awareness of ADR reporting is important, but time- and resource-consuming. The minimum effort taken should be to passively inform consumers, e.g. via stakeholders' homepages and via drug product information leaflets. Another possibility of reaching out to this target group could be through co-operation with other (non-government) organizations. Information from consumer reports may give a new perspective on ADRs via the consumers' unfiltered experiences. Consumers' views may change the way the benefit-harm balance of drugs is perceived and assessed today, and, being the ultimate users of drugs, consumers could have a relevant influence in the regulatory decision-making processes for drugs. All stakeholders in pharmacovigilance should embrace this new valuable source of information. </AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Härmark</LastName>
<ForeName>Linda</ForeName>
<Initials>L</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, WHO Collaborating Centre in Pharmacovigilance for Education and Patient Reporting, Goudsbloemvallei 7, 5237 MH, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, l.harmark@lareb.nl.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>van Hunsel</LastName>
<ForeName>Florence</ForeName>
<Initials>F</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Grundmark</LastName>
<ForeName>Birgitta</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>New Zealand</Country>
<MedlineTA>Drug Saf</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9002928</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0114-5916</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003256" MajorTopicYN="Y">Community Participation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D064420" MajorTopicYN="N">Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D009426" MajorTopicYN="N">Netherlands</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D060735" MajorTopicYN="Y">Pharmacovigilance</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011358" MajorTopicYN="N">Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D013548" MajorTopicYN="N">Sweden</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2015</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25627832</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>Am J Psychiatry. 1995 May;152(5):810</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7726327</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(5):336-40</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24838589</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):286-91</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21351310</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Mar 5;149(10):529-33</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15782689</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):515-24</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18484785</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):152-8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25079444</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385-96</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16689555</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A6651</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24846110</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Oct;20(10):1098-103</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21809408</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;29(2):157-64</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19512977</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2012 Oct 1;35(10):845-54</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22967189</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2007;30(3):187-90</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17343426</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2014 May;37(5):343-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24777653</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2012 Jan 1;35(1):45-60</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22149419</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;66(11):1143-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20658130</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Sep;12(9):1385-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24909698</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 May;67(5):558-64</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19552751</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):302-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23280652</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;36(3):199-206</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23444232</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2003;26(4):211-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12608885</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):148-56</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17274788</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMJ. 2004 Sep 4;329(7465):573</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15345644</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Lakartidningen. 2002 Aug 22;99(34):3290-5</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12362847</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2010 Sep 1;33(9):775-88</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20701410</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jan;19(1):26-32</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19953500</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;75(4):1109-17</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22905902</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Jun;22(3):231-3</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23937120</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2014 Jun;37(6):409-19</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24748428</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Ann Pharmacother. 2010 May;44(5):936-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20388861</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2012 Oct 1;35(10):807-18</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22928729</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014 Sep;13 Suppl 1:S21-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25171156</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;64(8):969-71</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12927017</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2009;32(11):1067-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19810778</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21545758</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Farm Hosp. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):65-71</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23461502</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):1134-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24092565</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2013 Apr;36(4):267-76</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23475583</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Med J Aust. 2013 Nov 18;199(10):684-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24237099</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e66338</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23823902</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):669-75</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17696579</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010 Feb 25;10:8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20184759</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMJ. 2012 Aug 07;345:e4916</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22872709</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;36(12):1129-49</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24092596</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippePaysBasV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000098 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000098 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    GrippePaysBasV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:25627832
   |texte=   ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:25627832" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippePaysBasV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35.
Data generation: Mon Aug 10 10:18:30 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 13:53:34 2021