People's perception and cost-effectiveness of home confinement during an influenza pandemic: evidence from the French case.
Identifieur interne : 000077 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000076; suivant : 000078People's perception and cost-effectiveness of home confinement during an influenza pandemic: evidence from the French case.
Auteurs : Caroline Orset [France]Source :
- The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care [ 1618-7601 ] ; 2018.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adolescent (MeSH), Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Analyse coût-bénéfice (MeSH), Attitude envers la santé (MeSH), Facteurs sociologiques (MeSH), France (MeSH), Grippe humaine (prévention et contrôle), Grippe humaine (psychologie), Grippe humaine (économie), Humains (MeSH), Observance par le patient (MeSH), Pandémies (prévention et contrôle), Perception (MeSH), Quarantaine (psychologie), Quarantaine (économie), Sujet âgé (MeSH).
- MESH :
- prévention et contrôle : Grippe humaine, Pandémies.
- psychologie : Grippe humaine, Quarantaine.
- économie : Grippe humaine, Quarantaine.
- Adolescent, Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse coût-bénéfice, Attitude envers la santé, Facteurs sociologiques, France, Humains, Observance par le patient, Perception, Sujet âgé.
- Wicri :
- geographic : France.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adolescent (MeSH), Adult (MeSH), Aged (MeSH), Attitude to Health (MeSH), Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH), France (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Influenza, Human (economics), Influenza, Human (prevention & control), Influenza, Human (psychology), Middle Aged (MeSH), Pandemics (prevention & control), Patient Compliance (MeSH), Perception (MeSH), Quarantine (economics), Quarantine (psychology), Sociological Factors (MeSH).
- MESH :
- geographic : France.
- economics : Influenza, Human, Quarantine.
- prevention & control : Influenza, Human, Pandemics.
- psychology : Influenza, Human, Quarantine.
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Perception, Sociological Factors.
Abstract
In France, home confinement is not a common preventive measure against an influenza pandemic, although it is used around the world. Based on a stated method approach, we analyze the attitude that the French would adopt if this measure were put in place. Next, we propose a cost-benefit analysis to discuss the cost-effectiveness of this measure. We find that over three-quarters of respondents report complying with home confinement. Their choice depends on their individual characteristics, the interaction they may have with an infected person and home confinement conditions, but not their experience with preventive measures. We find that behaviors such as sensitivity to certainty, selfishness and altruism emerge. As far as cost-effectiveness is concerned, our study shows that home confinement is a prevention path that should not be neglected and should even be prescribed.
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-0978-y
PubMed: 29687269
PubMed Central: PMC7087704
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">People's perception and cost-effectiveness of home confinement during an influenza pandemic: evidence from the French case.</title><author><name sortKey="Orset, Caroline" sort="Orset, Caroline" uniqKey="Orset C" first="Caroline" last="Orset">Caroline Orset</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Économie Publique, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France. caroline.orset@agroparistech.fr.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Économie Publique, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Île-de-France</region><region type="old region">Île-de-France</region><settlement type="city">Paris</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2018">2018</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:29687269</idno><idno type="pmid">29687269</idno><idno type="doi">10.1007/s10198-018-0978-y</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC7087704</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000074</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000074</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000074</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000074</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000074</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">People's perception and cost-effectiveness of home confinement during an influenza pandemic: evidence from the French case.</title><author><name sortKey="Orset, Caroline" sort="Orset, Caroline" uniqKey="Orset C" first="Caroline" last="Orset">Caroline Orset</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>Économie Publique, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France. caroline.orset@agroparistech.fr.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">France</country><wicri:regionArea>Économie Publique, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="region">Île-de-France</region><region type="old region">Île-de-France</region><settlement type="city">Paris</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care</title><idno type="eISSN">1618-7601</idno><imprint><date when="2018" type="published">2018</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent (MeSH)</term><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Attitude to Health (MeSH)</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis (MeSH)</term><term>France (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Influenza, Human (economics)</term><term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term><term>Influenza, Human (psychology)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Pandemics (prevention & control)</term><term>Patient Compliance (MeSH)</term><term>Perception (MeSH)</term><term>Quarantine (economics)</term><term>Quarantine (psychology)</term><term>Sociological Factors (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice (MeSH)</term><term>Attitude envers la santé (MeSH)</term><term>Facteurs sociologiques (MeSH)</term><term>France (MeSH)</term><term>Grippe humaine (prévention et contrôle)</term><term>Grippe humaine (psychologie)</term><term>Grippe humaine (économie)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Observance par le patient (MeSH)</term><term>Pandémies (prévention et contrôle)</term><term>Perception (MeSH)</term><term>Quarantaine (psychologie)</term><term>Quarantaine (économie)</term><term>Sujet âgé (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>France</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term><term>Quarantine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term><term>Pandemics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prévention et contrôle" xml:lang="fr"><term>Grippe humaine</term><term>Pandémies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Grippe humaine</term><term>Quarantaine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term><term>Quarantine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="économie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Grippe humaine</term><term>Quarantaine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Compliance</term><term>Perception</term><term>Sociological Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse coût-bénéfice</term><term>Attitude envers la santé</term><term>Facteurs sociologiques</term><term>France</term><term>Humains</term><term>Observance par le patient</term><term>Perception</term><term>Sujet âgé</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>France</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In France, home confinement is not a common preventive measure against an influenza pandemic, although it is used around the world. Based on a stated method approach, we analyze the attitude that the French would adopt if this measure were put in place. Next, we propose a cost-benefit analysis to discuss the cost-effectiveness of this measure. We find that over three-quarters of respondents report complying with home confinement. Their choice depends on their individual characteristics, the interaction they may have with an infected person and home confinement conditions, but not their experience with preventive measures. We find that behaviors such as sensitivity to certainty, selfishness and altruism emerge. As far as cost-effectiveness is concerned, our study shows that home confinement is a prevention path that should not be neglected and should even be prescribed.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">29687269</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2019</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>11</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1618-7601</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>19</Volume><Issue>9</Issue><PubDate><Year>2018</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Health Econ</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>People's perception and cost-effectiveness of home confinement during an influenza pandemic: evidence from the French case.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1335-1350</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1007/s10198-018-0978-y</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>In France, home confinement is not a common preventive measure against an influenza pandemic, although it is used around the world. Based on a stated method approach, we analyze the attitude that the French would adopt if this measure were put in place. Next, we propose a cost-benefit analysis to discuss the cost-effectiveness of this measure. We find that over three-quarters of respondents report complying with home confinement. Their choice depends on their individual characteristics, the interaction they may have with an infected person and home confinement conditions, but not their experience with preventive measures. We find that behaviors such as sensitivity to certainty, selfishness and altruism emerge. As far as cost-effectiveness is concerned, our study shows that home confinement is a prevention path that should not be neglected and should even be prescribed.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Orset</LastName><ForeName>Caroline</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Économie Publique, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France. caroline.orset@agroparistech.fr.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2018</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>23</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Health Econ</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101134867</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1618-7598</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001294" MajorTopicYN="N">Attitude to Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005602" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">France</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D058873" MajorTopicYN="N">Pandemics</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="N">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010349" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Compliance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010465" MajorTopicYN="N">Perception</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011790" MajorTopicYN="N">Quarantine</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D066252" MajorTopicYN="N">Sociological Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Cost–benefit analysis</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Epidemics</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Home confinement</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">People’s behavior</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Prevention measures</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Public health interventions</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2017</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2018</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2018</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2019</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2018</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">29687269</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s10198-018-0978-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">10.1007/s10198-018-0978-y</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC7087704</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Public Health. 2012 May;126(5):427-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22516790</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Arch Intern Med. 2001 Mar 12;161(5):749-59</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11231710</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):904-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15602562</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30333</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22393352</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Math Biosci Eng. 2010 Jul;7(3):687-717</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20578793</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2007 Jun 28;25(27):5086-96</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17544181</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):w15-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16434437</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Public Opin Q. 2000 Winter;64(4):464-94</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11171027</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2009 Jul 16;4(7):e6284</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19606227</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Oct;12(10):1548-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17176570</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2005 Aug 12;309(5737):1083-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16079251</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nature. 2005 Sep 8;437(7056):209-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16079797</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;7(4):289-96</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17376386</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Public Health. 2009 Apr 29;9:117</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19400970</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jan 29;6(1):e1000656</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20126529</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4005</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19104659</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Can J Public Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;96(1):52-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15682697</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;13(4):581-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17553273</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Infect. 2005 Jun;50(5):386-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15907545</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>France</li></country><region><li>Île-de-France</li></region><settlement><li>Paris</li></settlement></list><tree><country name="France"><region name="Île-de-France"><name sortKey="Orset, Caroline" sort="Orset, Caroline" uniqKey="Orset C" first="Caroline" last="Orset">Caroline Orset</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeFranceV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000077 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000077 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= GrippeFranceV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:29687269
|texte= People's perception and cost-effectiveness of home confinement during an influenza pandemic: evidence from the French case.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:29687269" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeFranceV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |