[Vaccine coverage against influenza and pneumococcal infections in patients aged 65 and over: a survey on 299 outpatients].
Identifieur interne : 000500 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000499; suivant : 000501[Vaccine coverage against influenza and pneumococcal infections in patients aged 65 and over: a survey on 299 outpatients].
Auteurs : A-S Delelis-Fanien ; F. Séité ; M. Priner ; M. PaccalinSource :
- La Revue de medecine interne [ 0248-8663 ] ; 2009.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Influenza Vaccines, Pneumococcal Vaccines.
- geographic : France.
- Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Population Surveillance.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
There is no compulsory vaccination in the adult population. Therefore, vaccine coverage appears heterogeneous.
METHODS
We performed a 2-month survey to evaluate the vaccine coverage administered by 11 general practitioners in their patients aged 65 and over, with a focus on influenza vaccination recommended in France for individuals being 65 years old or more and on pneumococcal vaccination indicated but not recommended in the same age population; analysing the reasons for non vaccine administration against influenza and pneumococcal infections.
RESULTS
Two hundred and ninety-nine patients were interviewed, mean age of 77+/-6,9 years; 76,3% were vaccinated against influenza; only nine patients out of the 46 having a recommendation for pneumococcal vaccine were immunized (19,6%). The main reasons for non vaccination were the fear of vaccine for influenza and a lack of information for the pneumococcal vaccine.
CONCLUSION
These results underline the low prevalence for pneumococcal vaccine in ambulatory patients, despite recommendations. Previous studies with controversial data might explain the low prevalence. Better information of the expected benefit of this vaccine and better correlation between indications and recommendations could increase its coverage.
DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2008.12.026
PubMed: 19345448
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19345448Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Vaccine coverage against influenza and pneumococcal infections in patients aged 65 and over: a survey on 299 outpatients].</title><author><name sortKey="Delelis Fanien, A S" sort="Delelis Fanien, A S" uniqKey="Delelis Fanien A" first="A-S" last="Delelis-Fanien">A-S Delelis-Fanien</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Pôle de gériatrie, CHU La Milétrie, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers cedex, France. anne-sophie.delelis-fanien@chu-poitiers.fr</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Seite, F" sort="Seite, F" uniqKey="Seite F" first="F" last="Séité">F. Séité</name></author><author><name sortKey="Priner, M" sort="Priner, M" uniqKey="Priner M" first="M" last="Priner">M. Priner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Paccalin, M" sort="Paccalin, M" uniqKey="Paccalin M" first="M" last="Paccalin">M. Paccalin</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19345448</idno><idno type="pmid">19345448</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.revmed.2008.12.026</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000500</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000500</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Vaccine coverage against influenza and pneumococcal infections in patients aged 65 and over: a survey on 299 outpatients].</title><author><name sortKey="Delelis Fanien, A S" sort="Delelis Fanien, A S" uniqKey="Delelis Fanien A" first="A-S" last="Delelis-Fanien">A-S Delelis-Fanien</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Pôle de gériatrie, CHU La Milétrie, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers cedex, France. anne-sophie.delelis-fanien@chu-poitiers.fr</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Seite, F" sort="Seite, F" uniqKey="Seite F" first="F" last="Séité">F. Séité</name></author><author><name sortKey="Priner, M" sort="Priner, M" uniqKey="Priner M" first="M" last="Priner">M. Priner</name></author><author><name sortKey="Paccalin, M" sort="Paccalin, M" uniqKey="Paccalin M" first="M" last="Paccalin">M. Paccalin</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">La Revue de medecine interne</title><idno type="ISSN">0248-8663</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Family Practice (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>France (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Influenza Vaccines (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Pneumococcal Vaccines (MeSH)</term><term>Population Surveillance (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza Vaccines</term><term>Pneumococcal Vaccines</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>France</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Family Practice</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Population Surveillance</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>INTRODUCTION</b></p><p>There is no compulsory vaccination in the adult population. Therefore, vaccine coverage appears heterogeneous.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>We performed a 2-month survey to evaluate the vaccine coverage administered by 11 general practitioners in their patients aged 65 and over, with a focus on influenza vaccination recommended in France for individuals being 65 years old or more and on pneumococcal vaccination indicated but not recommended in the same age population; analysing the reasons for non vaccine administration against influenza and pneumococcal infections.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>Two hundred and ninety-nine patients were interviewed, mean age of 77+/-6,9 years; 76,3% were vaccinated against influenza; only nine patients out of the 46 having a recommendation for pneumococcal vaccine were immunized (19,6%). The main reasons for non vaccination were the fear of vaccine for influenza and a lack of information for the pneumococcal vaccine.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>These results underline the low prevalence for pneumococcal vaccine in ambulatory patients, despite recommendations. Previous studies with controversial data might explain the low prevalence. Better information of the expected benefit of this vaccine and better correlation between indications and recommendations could increase its coverage.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19345448</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>18</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0248-8663</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>30</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>La Revue de medecine interne</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Rev Med Interne</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Vaccine coverage against influenza and pneumococcal infections in patients aged 65 and over: a survey on 299 outpatients].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>656-60</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.revmed.2008.12.026</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="INTRODUCTION" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">There is no compulsory vaccination in the adult population. Therefore, vaccine coverage appears heterogeneous.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">We performed a 2-month survey to evaluate the vaccine coverage administered by 11 general practitioners in their patients aged 65 and over, with a focus on influenza vaccination recommended in France for individuals being 65 years old or more and on pneumococcal vaccination indicated but not recommended in the same age population; analysing the reasons for non vaccine administration against influenza and pneumococcal infections.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Two hundred and ninety-nine patients were interviewed, mean age of 77+/-6,9 years; 76,3% were vaccinated against influenza; only nine patients out of the 46 having a recommendation for pneumococcal vaccine were immunized (19,6%). The main reasons for non vaccination were the fear of vaccine for influenza and a lack of information for the pneumococcal vaccine.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">These results underline the low prevalence for pneumococcal vaccine in ambulatory patients, despite recommendations. Previous studies with controversial data might explain the low prevalence. Better information of the expected benefit of this vaccine and better correlation between indications and recommendations could increase its coverage.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Delelis-Fanien</LastName><ForeName>A-S</ForeName><Initials>AS</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Pôle de gériatrie, CHU La Milétrie, 2, rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers cedex, France. anne-sophie.delelis-fanien@chu-poitiers.fr</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Séité</LastName><ForeName>F</ForeName><Initials>F</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Priner</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Paccalin</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>fre</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Couverture vaccinale antigrippale et antipneumococcique à partir de 65ans : étude sur 299 patients ambulatoires.</VernacularTitle><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2009</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>03</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>France</Country><MedlineTA>Rev Med Interne</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8101383</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0248-8663</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007252">Influenza Vaccines</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D022242">Pneumococcal Vaccines</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005194" MajorTopicYN="N">Family Practice</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005602" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">France</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007252" MajorTopicYN="Y">Influenza Vaccines</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D022242" MajorTopicYN="Y">Pneumococcal Vaccines</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011159" MajorTopicYN="N">Population Surveillance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2008</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2008</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2008</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19345448</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0248-8663(09)00082-4</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.revmed.2008.12.026</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeFranceV1/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000500 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000500 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= GrippeFranceV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19345448
|texte= [Vaccine coverage against influenza and pneumococcal infections in patients aged 65 and over: a survey on 299 outpatients].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19345448" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeFranceV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |