An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada.
Identifieur interne : 000582 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000581; suivant : 000583An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada.
Auteurs : Lyn M. Sibley [Canada] ; Jonathan P. WeinerSource :
- BMC health services research [ 1472-6963 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Accessibilité des services de santé (statistiques et données numériques), Canada (MeSH), Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH), Femelle (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Interface utilisateur (MeSH), Jeune adulte (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Odds ratio (MeSH), Population rurale (MeSH), Population urbaine (MeSH), Services de santé en milieu urbain (statistiques et données numériques), Services de santé ruraux (statistiques et données numériques), Études transversales (MeSH).
- MESH :
- statistiques et données numériques : Accessibilité des services de santé, Services de santé en milieu urbain, Services de santé ruraux.
- Canada, Enquêtes et questionnaires, Femelle, Humains, Interface utilisateur, Jeune adulte, Mâle, Odds ratio, Population rurale, Population urbaine, Études transversales.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Canada (MeSH), Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Health Services Accessibility (statistics & numerical data), Humans (MeSH), Male (MeSH), Odds Ratio (MeSH), Rural Health Services (statistics & numerical data), Rural Population (MeSH), Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH), Urban Health Services (statistics & numerical data), Urban Population (MeSH), User-Computer Interface (MeSH), Young Adult (MeSH).
- MESH :
- statistics & numerical data : Health Services Accessibility, Rural Health Services, Urban Health Services.
- Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Odds Ratio, Rural Population, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urban Population, User-Computer Interface, Young Adult.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Studies comparing the access to health care of rural and urban populations have been contradictory and inconclusive. These studies are complicated by the influence of other factor which have been shown to be related to access and utilization. This study assesses the equity of access to health care services across the rural-urban continuum in Canada before and after taking other determinants of access into account.
METHODS
This is a cross-sectional study of the population of the 10 provinces of Canada using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 2.1). Five different measures of access and utilization are compared across the continuum of rural-urban. Known determinants of utilization are taken into account according to Andersen's Health Behaviour Model (HBM); location of residence at the levels of province, health region, and community is also controlled for.
RESULTS
This study found that residents of small cities not adjacent to major centres, had the highest reported utilisation rates of influenza vaccines and family physician services, were most likely to have a regular medical doctor, and were most likely to report unmet need. Among the rural categories there was a gradient with the most rural being least likely to have had a flu shot, use specialist physicians services, or have a regular medical doctor. Residents of the most urban centres were more likely to report using specialist physician services. Many of these differences are diminished or eliminated once other factors are accounted for. After adjusting for other factors those living in the most urban areas were more likely to have seen a specialist physician. Those in rural communities had a lower odds of receiving a flu shot and having a regular medical doctor. People residing in the most urban and most rural communities were less likely to have a regular medical doctor. Those in any of the rural categories were less likely to report unmet need.
CONCLUSION
Inequities in access to care along the rural-urban continuum exist and can be masked when evaluation is done at a very large scale with gross indicators of rural-urban. Understanding the relationship between rural-urban and other determinants will help policy makers to target interventions appropriately: to specific demographic, provincial, community, or rural categories.
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-20
PubMed: 21281470
PubMed Central: PMC3045284
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada.</title><author><name sortKey="Sibley, Lyn M" sort="Sibley, Lyn M" uniqKey="Sibley L" first="Lyn M" last="Sibley">Lyn M. Sibley</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto ON M4N3M5, Canada. lyn.sibley@utoronto.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto ON M4N3M5</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Toronto ON M4N3M5</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weiner, Jonathan P" sort="Weiner, Jonathan P" uniqKey="Weiner J" first="Jonathan P" last="Weiner">Jonathan P. Weiner</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21281470</idno><idno type="pmid">21281470</idno><idno type="doi">10.1186/1472-6963-11-20</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3045284</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000569</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000569</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000569</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000569</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000569</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada.</title><author><name sortKey="Sibley, Lyn M" sort="Sibley, Lyn M" uniqKey="Sibley L" first="Lyn M" last="Sibley">Lyn M. Sibley</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto ON M4N3M5, Canada. lyn.sibley@utoronto.ca</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto ON M4N3M5</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Toronto ON M4N3M5</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Weiner, Jonathan P" sort="Weiner, Jonathan P" uniqKey="Weiner J" first="Jonathan P" last="Weiner">Jonathan P. Weiner</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">BMC health services research</title><idno type="eISSN">1472-6963</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Canada (MeSH)</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Health Services Accessibility (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Odds Ratio (MeSH)</term><term>Rural Health Services (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Rural Population (MeSH)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Urban Health Services (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Urban Population (MeSH)</term><term>User-Computer Interface (MeSH)</term><term>Young Adult (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Accessibilité des services de santé (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Canada (MeSH)</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Interface utilisateur (MeSH)</term><term>Jeune adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Odds ratio (MeSH)</term><term>Population rurale (MeSH)</term><term>Population urbaine (MeSH)</term><term>Services de santé en milieu urbain (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Services de santé ruraux (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Études transversales (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Health Services Accessibility</term><term>Rural Health Services</term><term>Urban Health Services</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistiques et données numériques" xml:lang="fr"><term>Accessibilité des services de santé</term><term>Services de santé en milieu urbain</term><term>Services de santé ruraux</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Canada</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Odds Ratio</term><term>Rural Population</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Urban Population</term><term>User-Computer Interface</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Canada</term><term>Enquêtes et questionnaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Interface utilisateur</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Odds ratio</term><term>Population rurale</term><term>Population urbaine</term><term>Études transversales</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Studies comparing the access to health care of rural and urban populations have been contradictory and inconclusive. These studies are complicated by the influence of other factor which have been shown to be related to access and utilization. This study assesses the equity of access to health care services across the rural-urban continuum in Canada before and after taking other determinants of access into account.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>This is a cross-sectional study of the population of the 10 provinces of Canada using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 2.1). Five different measures of access and utilization are compared across the continuum of rural-urban. Known determinants of utilization are taken into account according to Andersen's Health Behaviour Model (HBM); location of residence at the levels of province, health region, and community is also controlled for.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>This study found that residents of small cities not adjacent to major centres, had the highest reported utilisation rates of influenza vaccines and family physician services, were most likely to have a regular medical doctor, and were most likely to report unmet need. Among the rural categories there was a gradient with the most rural being least likely to have had a flu shot, use specialist physicians services, or have a regular medical doctor. Residents of the most urban centres were more likely to report using specialist physician services. Many of these differences are diminished or eliminated once other factors are accounted for. After adjusting for other factors those living in the most urban areas were more likely to have seen a specialist physician. Those in rural communities had a lower odds of receiving a flu shot and having a regular medical doctor. People residing in the most urban and most rural communities were less likely to have a regular medical doctor. Those in any of the rural categories were less likely to report unmet need.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>Inequities in access to care along the rural-urban continuum exist and can be masked when evaluation is done at a very large scale with gross indicators of rural-urban. Understanding the relationship between rural-urban and other determinants will help policy makers to target interventions appropriately: to specific demographic, provincial, community, or rural categories.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21281470</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>01</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1472-6963</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>11</Volume><PubDate><Year>2011</Year><Month>Jan</Month><Day>31</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>BMC health services research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>BMC Health Serv Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>20</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/1472-6963-11-20</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Studies comparing the access to health care of rural and urban populations have been contradictory and inconclusive. These studies are complicated by the influence of other factor which have been shown to be related to access and utilization. This study assesses the equity of access to health care services across the rural-urban continuum in Canada before and after taking other determinants of access into account.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">This is a cross-sectional study of the population of the 10 provinces of Canada using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 2.1). Five different measures of access and utilization are compared across the continuum of rural-urban. Known determinants of utilization are taken into account according to Andersen's Health Behaviour Model (HBM); location of residence at the levels of province, health region, and community is also controlled for.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">This study found that residents of small cities not adjacent to major centres, had the highest reported utilisation rates of influenza vaccines and family physician services, were most likely to have a regular medical doctor, and were most likely to report unmet need. Among the rural categories there was a gradient with the most rural being least likely to have had a flu shot, use specialist physicians services, or have a regular medical doctor. Residents of the most urban centres were more likely to report using specialist physician services. Many of these differences are diminished or eliminated once other factors are accounted for. After adjusting for other factors those living in the most urban areas were more likely to have seen a specialist physician. Those in rural communities had a lower odds of receiving a flu shot and having a regular medical doctor. People residing in the most urban and most rural communities were less likely to have a regular medical doctor. Those in any of the rural categories were less likely to report unmet need.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Inequities in access to care along the rural-urban continuum exist and can be masked when evaluation is done at a very large scale with gross indicators of rural-urban. Understanding the relationship between rural-urban and other determinants will help policy makers to target interventions appropriately: to specific demographic, provincial, community, or rural categories.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sibley</LastName><ForeName>Lyn M</ForeName><Initials>LM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto ON M4N3M5, Canada. lyn.sibley@utoronto.ca</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Weiner</LastName><ForeName>Jonathan P</ForeName><Initials>JP</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><Agency>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</Agency><Country>Canada</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>31</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>BMC Health Serv Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101088677</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1472-6963</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002170" MajorTopicYN="N">Canada</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006297" MajorTopicYN="Y">Health Services Accessibility</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016017" MajorTopicYN="N">Odds Ratio</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019035" MajorTopicYN="N">Rural Health Services</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012424" MajorTopicYN="Y">Rural Population</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019037" MajorTopicYN="N">Urban Health Services</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014505" MajorTopicYN="Y">Urban Population</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014584" MajorTopicYN="N">User-Computer Interface</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2010</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>08</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2011</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>31</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21281470</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">1472-6963-11-20</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1472-6963-11-20</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3045284</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Inquiry. 2004 Spring;41(1):39-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15224959</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Milbank Q. 1997;75(1):89-111</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9063301</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Dec;59(4):384-411</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12508702</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Can J Public Health. 2002 Jul-Aug;93(4):303-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12154535</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Mar 15;149(6):577-85</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10084248</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1839-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17614174</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7738325</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Can Fam Physician. 2001 Jan;47:58-64</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11212435</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Aust J Rural Health. 2000 Oct;8(5):254-60</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11894255</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Jan 1;161(1):81-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15615918</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Can Commun Dis Rep. 2002 Aug 1;28(ACS-5):1-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12168402</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Health Econ. 2005 Nov;24(6):1076-107</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16139910</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Chronic Dis Can. 2003 Fall;24(4):116-23</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14733761</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Can J Public Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;98 Suppl 1:S54-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18047161</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(4):629-53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8080493</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17349059</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(1):123-33</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10817475</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Inquiry. 2004 Spring;41(1):21-38</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15224958</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>CMAJ. 2004 Nov 9;171(10):1213-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15534315</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Aust J Rural Health. 2008 Apr;16(2):56-66</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18318846</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Mar;46(1):15-31</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15869118</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Healthc Q. 2005;8(4):49-52, 2</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16323514</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Aging Health. 2001 Aug;13(3):329-54</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11813730</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Aust J Rural Health. 1997 May;5(2):59-63</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9444122</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jan;50(1):62-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12028248</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Scand J Soc Med. 1996 Mar;24(1):2-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8740870</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 2005 Feb;60(4):777-87</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15571895</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Policy. 2004 Feb;67(2):137-48</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14720632</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Rep. 2007 Feb;18(1):23-35</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17441441</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Healthc Policy. 2008 May;3(4):83-99</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19377331</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS Med. 2008 Oct 28;5(10):e211</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18959473</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):531-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15908847</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Apr;60(4):290-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16537344</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am Behav Sci. 1993 Jul-Aug;36(6):724-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11657446</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Public Health. 2005 Feb;119(2):97-104</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15694956</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Weiner, Jonathan P" sort="Weiner, Jonathan P" uniqKey="Weiner J" first="Jonathan P" last="Weiner">Jonathan P. Weiner</name></noCountry><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Sibley, Lyn M" sort="Sibley, Lyn M" uniqKey="Sibley L" first="Lyn M" last="Sibley">Lyn M. Sibley</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeCanadaV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000582 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000582 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= GrippeCanadaV4
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21281470
|texte= An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21281470" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeCanadaV4
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |