Serveur d'exploration sur la grippe au Canada

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Identifieur interne : 000496 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000495; suivant : 000497

What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.

Auteurs : Natalie Henrich [Canada] ; Bev Holmes

Source :

RBID : pubmed:21533161

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, a vaccine was made available to all Canadians. Despite efforts to promote vaccination, the public's intent to vaccinate remained low. In order to better understand the public's resistance to getting vaccinated, this study addressed factors that influenced the public's decision making about uptake. To do this, we used a relatively novel source of qualitative data--comments posted on-line in response to news articles on a particular topic. This study analysed 1,796 comments posted in response to 12 articles dealing with H1N1 vaccine on websites of three major Canadian news sources. Articles were selected based on topic and number of comments. A second objective was to assess the extent to which on-line comments can be used as a reliable data source to capture public attitudes during a health crisis. The following seven themes were mentioned in at least 5% of the comments (% indicates the percentage of comments that included the theme): fear of H1N1 (18.8%); responsibility of media (17.8%); government competency (17.7%); government trustworthiness (10.7%); fear of H1N1 vaccine (8.1%); pharmaceutical companies (7.6%); and personal protective measures (5.8%). It is assumed that the more frequently a theme was mentioned, the more that theme influenced decision making about vaccination. These key themes for the public were often not aligned with the issues and information officials perceived, and conveyed, as relevant in the decision making process. The main themes from the comments were consistent with results from surveys and focus groups addressing similar issues, which suggest that on-line comments do provide a reliable source of qualitative data on attitudes and perceptions of issues that emerge in a health crisis. The insights derived from the comments can contribute to improved communication and policy decisions about vaccination in health crises that incorporate the public's views.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018479
PubMed: 21533161
PubMed Central: PMC3078916


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Henrich, Natalie" sort="Henrich, Natalie" uniqKey="Henrich N" first="Natalie" last="Henrich">Natalie Henrich</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<nlm:affiliation>Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada. nhenrich@cheos.ubc.ca</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Vancouver</settlement>
<region type="state">Colombie-Britannique</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Holmes, Bev" sort="Holmes, Bev" uniqKey="Holmes B" first="Bev" last="Holmes">Bev Holmes</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:21533161</idno>
<idno type="pmid">21533161</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0018479</idno>
<idno type="pmc">PMC3078916</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000541</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000541</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000541</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000541</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000541</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Henrich, Natalie" sort="Henrich, Natalie" uniqKey="Henrich N" first="Natalie" last="Henrich">Natalie Henrich</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3">
<nlm:affiliation>Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada. nhenrich@cheos.ubc.ca</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Vancouver</settlement>
<region type="state">Colombie-Britannique</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Holmes, Bev" sort="Holmes, Bev" uniqKey="Holmes B" first="Bev" last="Holmes">Bev Holmes</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">PloS one</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2011" type="published">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult (MeSH)</term>
<term>Attitude to Health (MeSH)</term>
<term>Canada (MeSH)</term>
<term>Decision Making (MeSH)</term>
<term>Female (MeSH)</term>
<term>Humans (MeSH)</term>
<term>Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype (isolation & purification)</term>
<term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Influenza, Human (virology)</term>
<term>Male (MeSH)</term>
<term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term>
<term>Patient Acceptance of Health Care (MeSH)</term>
<term>Public Opinion (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Acceptation des soins par les patients (MeSH)</term>
<term>Adulte (MeSH)</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term>
<term>Attitude envers la santé (MeSH)</term>
<term>Canada (MeSH)</term>
<term>Femelle (MeSH)</term>
<term>Grippe humaine (prévention et contrôle)</term>
<term>Grippe humaine (virologie)</term>
<term>Humains (MeSH)</term>
<term>Mâle (MeSH)</term>
<term>Opinion publique (MeSH)</term>
<term>Prise de décision (MeSH)</term>
<term>Sous-type H1N1 du virus de la grippe A (isolement et purification)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Canada</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolation & purification" xml:lang="en">
<term>Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="isolement et purification" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Sous-type H1N1 du virus de la grippe A</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en">
<term>Influenza, Human</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prévention et contrôle" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Grippe humaine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="virologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Grippe humaine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="virology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Influenza, Human</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Attitude to Health</term>
<term>Decision Making</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</term>
<term>Public Opinion</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Acceptation des soins par les patients</term>
<term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Attitude envers la santé</term>
<term>Canada</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Opinion publique</term>
<term>Prise de décision</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Canada</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, a vaccine was made available to all Canadians. Despite efforts to promote vaccination, the public's intent to vaccinate remained low. In order to better understand the public's resistance to getting vaccinated, this study addressed factors that influenced the public's decision making about uptake. To do this, we used a relatively novel source of qualitative data--comments posted on-line in response to news articles on a particular topic. This study analysed 1,796 comments posted in response to 12 articles dealing with H1N1 vaccine on websites of three major Canadian news sources. Articles were selected based on topic and number of comments. A second objective was to assess the extent to which on-line comments can be used as a reliable data source to capture public attitudes during a health crisis. The following seven themes were mentioned in at least 5% of the comments (% indicates the percentage of comments that included the theme): fear of H1N1 (18.8%); responsibility of media (17.8%); government competency (17.7%); government trustworthiness (10.7%); fear of H1N1 vaccine (8.1%); pharmaceutical companies (7.6%); and personal protective measures (5.8%). It is assumed that the more frequently a theme was mentioned, the more that theme influenced decision making about vaccination. These key themes for the public were often not aligned with the issues and information officials perceived, and conveyed, as relevant in the decision making process. The main themes from the comments were consistent with results from surveys and focus groups addressing similar issues, which suggest that on-line comments do provide a reliable source of qualitative data on attitudes and perceptions of issues that emerge in a health crisis. The insights derived from the comments can contribute to improved communication and policy decisions about vaccination in health crises that incorporate the public's views.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">21533161</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2018</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Electronic">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet">
<Volume>6</Volume>
<Issue>4</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>Apr</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>PloS one</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>PLoS ONE</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>e18479</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0018479</ELocationID>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>During the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, a vaccine was made available to all Canadians. Despite efforts to promote vaccination, the public's intent to vaccinate remained low. In order to better understand the public's resistance to getting vaccinated, this study addressed factors that influenced the public's decision making about uptake. To do this, we used a relatively novel source of qualitative data--comments posted on-line in response to news articles on a particular topic. This study analysed 1,796 comments posted in response to 12 articles dealing with H1N1 vaccine on websites of three major Canadian news sources. Articles were selected based on topic and number of comments. A second objective was to assess the extent to which on-line comments can be used as a reliable data source to capture public attitudes during a health crisis. The following seven themes were mentioned in at least 5% of the comments (% indicates the percentage of comments that included the theme): fear of H1N1 (18.8%); responsibility of media (17.8%); government competency (17.7%); government trustworthiness (10.7%); fear of H1N1 vaccine (8.1%); pharmaceutical companies (7.6%); and personal protective measures (5.8%). It is assumed that the more frequently a theme was mentioned, the more that theme influenced decision making about vaccination. These key themes for the public were often not aligned with the issues and information officials perceived, and conveyed, as relevant in the decision making process. The main themes from the comments were consistent with results from surveys and focus groups addressing similar issues, which suggest that on-line comments do provide a reliable source of qualitative data on attitudes and perceptions of issues that emerge in a health crisis. The insights derived from the comments can contribute to improved communication and policy decisions about vaccination in health crises that incorporate the public's views.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Henrich</LastName>
<ForeName>Natalie</ForeName>
<Initials>N</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, Canada. nhenrich@cheos.ubc.ca</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Holmes</LastName>
<ForeName>Bev</ForeName>
<Initials>B</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001294" MajorTopicYN="N">Attitude to Health</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D002170" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Canada</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003657" MajorTopicYN="N">Decision Making</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D053118" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000302" MajorTopicYN="Y">isolation & purification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000821" MajorTopicYN="N">virology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010342" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Acceptance of Health Care</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011639" MajorTopicYN="Y">Public Opinion</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2010</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>01</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2011</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>31</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21533161</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0018479</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3078916</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
<ReferenceList>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Community Health. 2003 Oct;28(5):347-62</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14535600</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):e65</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20484390</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10199</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20421908</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Qual Health Res. 2004 Dec;14(10):1366-86</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15538005</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Euro Surveill. 2009;14(49). pii: 19437</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20003909</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:99</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20403201</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Public Opin Q. 2000 Fall;64(3):239-56</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11114267</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 7;278(1702):42-9</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20667876</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Med J Aust. 2010 Jan 4;192(1):33-6</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20047546</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Prev Med. 2010 Aug;51(2):185-7</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20510270</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:151-74</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19705558</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;31(10):1017-24</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20707670</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Eur J Public Health. 2010 Oct;20(5):490-4</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20444821</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Immune Based Ther Vaccines. 2003 Nov 5;1(1):3</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14613575</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;26(2):136-45</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17385964</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Nature. 2009 Oct 8;461(7265):698</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19812628</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Vaccine. 2010 Sep 7;28 Suppl 4:D3-13</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20713258</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>BMC Public Health. 2010;10:130</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20226093</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Vaccine. 2010 Jun 17;28(28):4499-505</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20451639</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Aust J Public Health. 1992 Jun;16(2):145-50</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1391155</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11292</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20593024</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>Emerg Health Threats J. 2009;2:e8</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22460289</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
<Reference>
<Citation>J Crit Care. 2007 Jun;22(2):104-11</Citation>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17548020</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</Reference>
</ReferenceList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Canada</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Colombie-Britannique</li>
</region>
<settlement>
<li>Vancouver</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Holmes, Bev" sort="Holmes, Bev" uniqKey="Holmes B" first="Bev" last="Holmes">Bev Holmes</name>
</noCountry>
<country name="Canada">
<region name="Colombie-Britannique">
<name sortKey="Henrich, Natalie" sort="Henrich, Natalie" uniqKey="Henrich N" first="Natalie" last="Henrich">Natalie Henrich</name>
</region>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeCanadaV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000496 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000496 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    GrippeCanadaV4
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:21533161
   |texte=   What the public was saying about the H1N1 vaccine: perceptions and issues discussed in on-line comments during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:21533161" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeCanadaV4 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35.
Data generation: Sat Aug 8 18:52:12 2020. Site generation: Sat Feb 13 16:40:04 2021