Lay people's interpretation of ethical values related to mass vaccination; the case of A(H1N1) vaccination campaign in the province of Quebec (French Canada).
Identifieur interne : 000282 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000281; suivant : 000283Lay people's interpretation of ethical values related to mass vaccination; the case of A(H1N1) vaccination campaign in the province of Quebec (French Canada).
Auteurs : Raymond Massé [Canada] ; Michel DésySource :
- Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy [ 1369-7625 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adolescent (MeSH), Adulte (MeSH), Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH), Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé (MeSH), Femelle (MeSH), Grippe humaine (prévention et contrôle), Groupes de discussion (MeSH), Humains (MeSH), Jeune adulte (MeSH), Mâle (MeSH), Québec (MeSH), Responsabilité sociale (MeSH), Sous-type H1N1 du virus de la grippe A (MeSH), Sujet âgé (MeSH), Vaccination de masse (éthique).
- MESH :
- prévention et contrôle : Grippe humaine.
- éthique : Vaccination de masse.
- Adolescent, Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé, Femelle, Groupes de discussion, Humains, Jeune adulte, Mâle, Québec, Responsabilité sociale, Sous-type H1N1 du virus de la grippe A, Sujet âgé.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adolescent (MeSH), Adult (MeSH), Aged (MeSH), Female (MeSH), Focus Groups (MeSH), Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice (MeSH), Humans (MeSH), Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype (MeSH), Influenza, Human (prevention & control), Male (MeSH), Mass Vaccination (ethics), Middle Aged (MeSH), Quebec (MeSH), Social Responsibility (MeSH), Young Adult (MeSH).
- MESH :
- geographic : Quebec.
- ethics : Mass Vaccination.
- prevention & control : Influenza, Human.
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Focus Groups, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Male, Middle Aged, Social Responsibility, Young Adult.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Pandemic influenza ethics frameworks are based on respect of values and principles such as regard for autonomy, responsibility, transparency, solidarity and social justice. However, very few studies have addressed the way in which the general population views these moral norms.
OBJECTIVES
(i) To analyse the receptiveness of the population of French-speaking Quebecers to certain ethical principles promoted by public health authorities during the AH1N1 vaccination campaign. (ii) To add to the limited number of empirical studies that examine the population's perception of ethical values.
DESIGN
Eight months after the end of the AH1N1 vaccination campaign in the Province of Quebec (Canada), 100 French-speaking Quebecers were assembled in ten focus groups. Discussions focussed on the level of respect shown by public health authorities for individual autonomy, the limits of appeals for solidarity, the balance between vaccination efficiency and social justice towards non-prioritized subpopulations, vaccination as a demonstration of civic duty and social responsibility.
RESULTS
The population acknowledged a high level of individual responsibility towards family members and agreed to vaccination to protect children and ageing parents. However, the concepts of civic duty and solidarity did not elucidate unanimous support, despite the fact that social justice stood out as a dominant value of public morals.
CONCLUSION
The ethical principles promoted in influenza pandemic ethics frameworks are subject to reinterpretation by the population. An ethic of public health must consider their understanding of the fundamental values that legitimize mass vaccination.
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12005
PubMed: 23016511
PubMed Central: PMC5060925
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Lay people's interpretation of ethical values related to mass vaccination; the case of A(H1N1) vaccination campaign in the province of Quebec (French Canada).</title><author><name sortKey="Masse, Raymond" sort="Masse, Raymond" uniqKey="Masse R" first="Raymond" last="Massé">Raymond Massé</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Anthropology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Anthropology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université Laval</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Québec (ville)</settlement><region type="state">Québec</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Desy, Michel" sort="Desy, Michel" uniqKey="Desy M" first="Michel" last="Désy">Michel Désy</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23016511</idno><idno type="pmid">23016511</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/hex.12005</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC5060925</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000417</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000417</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000417</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000417</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000417</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Lay people's interpretation of ethical values related to mass vaccination; the case of A(H1N1) vaccination campaign in the province of Quebec (French Canada).</title><author><name sortKey="Masse, Raymond" sort="Masse, Raymond" uniqKey="Masse R" first="Raymond" last="Massé">Raymond Massé</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Anthropology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Anthropology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université Laval</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Québec (ville)</settlement><region type="state">Québec</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Desy, Michel" sort="Desy, Michel" uniqKey="Desy M" first="Michel" last="Désy">Michel Désy</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy</title><idno type="eISSN">1369-7625</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent (MeSH)</term><term>Adult (MeSH)</term><term>Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Female (MeSH)</term><term>Focus Groups (MeSH)</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice (MeSH)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype (MeSH)</term><term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term><term>Male (MeSH)</term><term>Mass Vaccination (ethics)</term><term>Middle Aged (MeSH)</term><term>Quebec (MeSH)</term><term>Social Responsibility (MeSH)</term><term>Young Adult (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen (MeSH)</term><term>Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé (MeSH)</term><term>Femelle (MeSH)</term><term>Grippe humaine (prévention et contrôle)</term><term>Groupes de discussion (MeSH)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Jeune adulte (MeSH)</term><term>Mâle (MeSH)</term><term>Québec (MeSH)</term><term>Responsabilité sociale (MeSH)</term><term>Sous-type H1N1 du virus de la grippe A (MeSH)</term><term>Sujet âgé (MeSH)</term><term>Vaccination de masse (éthique)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Quebec</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="ethics" xml:lang="en"><term>Mass Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prévention et contrôle" xml:lang="fr"><term>Grippe humaine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="éthique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Vaccination de masse</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Female</term><term>Focus Groups</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</term><term>Humans</term><term>Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Social Responsibility</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Groupes de discussion</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Québec</term><term>Responsabilité sociale</term><term>Sous-type H1N1 du virus de la grippe A</term><term>Sujet âgé</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Pandemic influenza ethics frameworks are based on respect of values and principles such as regard for autonomy, responsibility, transparency, solidarity and social justice. However, very few studies have addressed the way in which the general population views these moral norms.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>OBJECTIVES</b></p><p>(i) To analyse the receptiveness of the population of French-speaking Quebecers to certain ethical principles promoted by public health authorities during the AH1N1 vaccination campaign. (ii) To add to the limited number of empirical studies that examine the population's perception of ethical values.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>DESIGN</b></p><p>Eight months after the end of the AH1N1 vaccination campaign in the Province of Quebec (Canada), 100 French-speaking Quebecers were assembled in ten focus groups. Discussions focussed on the level of respect shown by public health authorities for individual autonomy, the limits of appeals for solidarity, the balance between vaccination efficiency and social justice towards non-prioritized subpopulations, vaccination as a demonstration of civic duty and social responsibility.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>The population acknowledged a high level of individual responsibility towards family members and agreed to vaccination to protect children and ageing parents. However, the concepts of civic duty and solidarity did not elucidate unanimous support, despite the fact that social justice stood out as a dominant value of public morals.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>The ethical principles promoted in influenza pandemic ethics frameworks are subject to reinterpretation by the population. An ethic of public health must consider their understanding of the fundamental values that legitimize mass vaccination.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23016511</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>01</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2020</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>05</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1369-7625</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>17</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Health Expect</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Lay people's interpretation of ethical values related to mass vaccination; the case of A(H1N1) vaccination campaign in the province of Quebec (French Canada).</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>876-87</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/hex.12005</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Pandemic influenza ethics frameworks are based on respect of values and principles such as regard for autonomy, responsibility, transparency, solidarity and social justice. However, very few studies have addressed the way in which the general population views these moral norms.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">(i) To analyse the receptiveness of the population of French-speaking Quebecers to certain ethical principles promoted by public health authorities during the AH1N1 vaccination campaign. (ii) To add to the limited number of empirical studies that examine the population's perception of ethical values.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="DESIGN" NlmCategory="METHODS">Eight months after the end of the AH1N1 vaccination campaign in the Province of Quebec (Canada), 100 French-speaking Quebecers were assembled in ten focus groups. Discussions focussed on the level of respect shown by public health authorities for individual autonomy, the limits of appeals for solidarity, the balance between vaccination efficiency and social justice towards non-prioritized subpopulations, vaccination as a demonstration of civic duty and social responsibility.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The population acknowledged a high level of individual responsibility towards family members and agreed to vaccination to protect children and ageing parents. However, the concepts of civic duty and solidarity did not elucidate unanimous support, despite the fact that social justice stood out as a dominant value of public morals.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The ethical principles promoted in influenza pandemic ethics frameworks are subject to reinterpretation by the population. An ethic of public health must consider their understanding of the fundamental values that legitimize mass vaccination.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Massé</LastName><ForeName>Raymond</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Anthropology, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Désy</LastName><ForeName>Michel</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><Agency>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</Agency><Country>Canada</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>28</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Health Expect</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9815926</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1369-6513</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017144" MajorTopicYN="N">Focus Groups</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007722" MajorTopicYN="Y">Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D053118" MajorTopicYN="Y">Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032541" MajorTopicYN="N">Mass Vaccination</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000941" MajorTopicYN="Y">ethics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011792" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Quebec</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012941" MajorTopicYN="Y">Social Responsibility</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">AH1N1</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Canada</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ethical values</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">ethics</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">lay perceptions</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">vaccination</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>25</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>29</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>2</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23016511</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/hex.12005</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5060925</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Nurse Res. 2006 Jul 1;13(4):84</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27702218</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bioeth. 2009 Nov;9(11):4-14</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19882444</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vaccine. 2004 Aug 13;22(23-24):3122-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15297064</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S185-92</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19675459</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(2):239-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12765705</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Fall;34(3):620-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17144186</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioethics. 1998 Apr;12(2):125-49</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11655329</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Biosecur Bioterror. 2008 Sep;6(3):227-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18795832</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):331-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19754694</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Expect. 2005 Jun;8(2):172-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15860057</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1342-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14656848</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 11;10:125</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20219140</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioethics. 2005 Aug;19(4):422-31</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16222857</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioethics. 2004 Nov;18(6):515-30</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15580722</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Public Health. 2012 Apr;102(4):591-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22397338</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country><region><li>Québec</li></region><settlement><li>Québec (ville)</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université Laval</li></orgName></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Desy, Michel" sort="Desy, Michel" uniqKey="Desy M" first="Michel" last="Désy">Michel Désy</name></noCountry><country name="Canada"><region name="Québec"><name sortKey="Masse, Raymond" sort="Masse, Raymond" uniqKey="Masse R" first="Raymond" last="Massé">Raymond Massé</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeCanadaV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000282 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000282 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= GrippeCanadaV4
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23016511
|texte= Lay people's interpretation of ethical values related to mass vaccination; the case of A(H1N1) vaccination campaign in the province of Quebec (French Canada).
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23016511" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeCanadaV4
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |