Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records.
Identifieur interne : 000428 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000427; suivant : 000429Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records.
Auteurs : Michelle Greiver [Canada] ; Jan Barnsley ; Richard H. Glazier ; Bart J. Harvey ; Rahim MoineddinSource :
- BMC health services research [ 1472-6963 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Audit médical (), Bases de données factuelles, Comorbidité, Dossiers médicaux (normes), Dossiers médicaux électroniques (), Dossiers médicaux électroniques (normes), Femelle, Groupes homogènes de malades, Humains, Indicateurs qualité santé, Maladie chronique (), Maladie chronique (épidémiologie), Médecins de famille (normes), Médecins de famille (organisation et administration), Ontario, Qualité des soins de santé (), Qualité des soins de santé (économie), Recherche sur les services de santé, Reproductibilité des résultats, Services de médecine préventive (), Services de médecine préventive (normes), Tests diagnostiques courants (), Tests diagnostiques courants (normes), Types de pratiques des médecins (), Études ergonomiques.
- MESH :
- normes : Dossiers médicaux, Dossiers médicaux électroniques, Médecins de famille, Services de médecine préventive, Tests diagnostiques courants.
- organisation et administration : Médecins de famille.
- économie : Qualité des soins de santé.
- épidémiologie : Maladie chronique.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Audit médical, Bases de données factuelles, Comorbidité, Dossiers médicaux électroniques, Femelle, Groupes homogènes de malades, Humains, Indicateurs qualité santé, Maladie chronique, Ontario, Qualité des soins de santé, Recherche sur les services de santé, Reproductibilité des résultats, Services de médecine préventive, Tests diagnostiques courants, Types de pratiques des médecins, Études ergonomiques.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Chronic Disease (epidemiology), Chronic Disease (prevention & control), Comorbidity, Databases, Factual, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Diagnostic Tests, Routine (standards), Diagnostic Tests, Routine (statistics & numerical data), Electronic Health Records (standards), Electronic Health Records (statistics & numerical data), Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Medical Audit (statistics & numerical data), Medical Records (standards), Middle Aged, Ontario, Physicians, Family (organization & administration), Physicians, Family (standards), Practice Patterns, Physicians' (statistics & numerical data), Preventive Health Services (standards), Preventive Health Services (statistics & numerical data), Quality Indicators, Health Care, Quality of Health Care (economics), Quality of Health Care (statistics & numerical data), Reproducibility of Results, Time and Motion Studies.
- MESH :
- economics : Quality of Health Care.
- epidemiology : Chronic Disease.
- organization & administration : Physicians, Family.
- prevention & control : Chronic Disease.
- standards : Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Electronic Health Records, Medical Records, Physicians, Family, Preventive Health Services.
- statistics & numerical data : Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Electronic Health Records, Medical Audit, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Preventive Health Services, Quality of Health Care.
- Adult, Comorbidity, Databases, Factual, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Middle Aged, Ontario, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, Time and Motion Studies.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Improvements in the quality of health care services are often measured using data present in medical records. Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) contain potentially valuable new sources of health data. However, data quality in EMRs may not be optimal and should be assessed. Data reliability (are the same data elements being measured over time?) is a prerequisite for data validity (are the data accurate?). Our objective was to measure the reliability of data for preventive services in primary care EMRs during the transition to EMR.
METHODS
Our data sources were randomly selected eligible patients' medical records and data obtained from provincial administrative datasets. Eighteen community-based family physicians in Toronto, Ontario that implemented EMRs starting in 2006 participated in this study. We measured the proportion of patients eligible for a service (Pap smear, screening mammogram or influenza vaccination) that received the service. We compared the change in rates of selected preventive services calculated from the medical record audits with the change in administrative datasets.
RESULTS
In the first year of EMR use (2006) services decreased by 8.7% more (95% CI -11.0%- - 6.4%, p < 0.0001) when measured through medical record audits as compared with administrative datasets. Services increased by 2.4% more (95% CI 0%-4.9%, p = 0.05) in the medical record audits during the second year of EMR use (2007).
CONCLUSION
There were differences between the change measured through medical record audits and administrative datasets. Problems could include difficulties with organizing new data entry processes as well as continued use of both paper and EMRs. Data extracted from EMRs had limited reliability during the initial phase of EMR implementation. Unreliable data interferes with the ability to measure and improve health care quality.
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-116
PubMed: 22583552
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records.</title><author><name sortKey="Greiver, Michelle" sort="Greiver, Michelle" uniqKey="Greiver M" first="Michelle" last="Greiver">Michelle Greiver</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Duncan Mill Road, Suite 705, Toronto, ON, Canada. mgreiver@rogers.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Duncan Mill Road, Suite 705, Toronto, ON</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Toronto</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Toronto</settlement><region type="state">Ontario</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Barnsley, Jan" sort="Barnsley, Jan" uniqKey="Barnsley J" first="Jan" last="Barnsley">Jan Barnsley</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glazier, Richard H" sort="Glazier, Richard H" uniqKey="Glazier R" first="Richard H" last="Glazier">Richard H. Glazier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harvey, Bart J" sort="Harvey, Bart J" uniqKey="Harvey B" first="Bart J" last="Harvey">Bart J. Harvey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moineddin, Rahim" sort="Moineddin, Rahim" uniqKey="Moineddin R" first="Rahim" last="Moineddin">Rahim Moineddin</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22583552</idno><idno type="pmid">22583552</idno><idno type="doi">10.1186/1472-6963-12-116</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000435</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000435</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000435</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000435</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000435</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records.</title><author><name sortKey="Greiver, Michelle" sort="Greiver, Michelle" uniqKey="Greiver M" first="Michelle" last="Greiver">Michelle Greiver</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Duncan Mill Road, Suite 705, Toronto, ON, Canada. mgreiver@rogers.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Duncan Mill Road, Suite 705, Toronto, ON</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Toronto</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Toronto</settlement><region type="state">Ontario</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Barnsley, Jan" sort="Barnsley, Jan" uniqKey="Barnsley J" first="Jan" last="Barnsley">Jan Barnsley</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glazier, Richard H" sort="Glazier, Richard H" uniqKey="Glazier R" first="Richard H" last="Glazier">Richard H. Glazier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harvey, Bart J" sort="Harvey, Bart J" uniqKey="Harvey B" first="Bart J" last="Harvey">Bart J. Harvey</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moineddin, Rahim" sort="Moineddin, Rahim" uniqKey="Moineddin R" first="Rahim" last="Moineddin">Rahim Moineddin</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">BMC health services research</title><idno type="eISSN">1472-6963</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Chronic Disease (epidemiology)</term><term>Chronic Disease (prevention & control)</term><term>Comorbidity</term><term>Databases, Factual</term><term>Diagnosis-Related Groups</term><term>Diagnostic Tests, Routine (standards)</term><term>Diagnostic Tests, Routine (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Electronic Health Records (standards)</term><term>Electronic Health Records (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Female</term><term>Health Services Research</term><term>Humans</term><term>Medical Audit (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Medical Records (standards)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Physicians, Family (organization & administration)</term><term>Physicians, Family (standards)</term><term>Practice Patterns, Physicians' (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Preventive Health Services (standards)</term><term>Preventive Health Services (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Quality Indicators, Health Care</term><term>Quality of Health Care (economics)</term><term>Quality of Health Care (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Time and Motion Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Audit médical ()</term><term>Bases de données factuelles</term><term>Comorbidité</term><term>Dossiers médicaux (normes)</term><term>Dossiers médicaux électroniques ()</term><term>Dossiers médicaux électroniques (normes)</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Groupes homogènes de malades</term><term>Humains</term><term>Indicateurs qualité santé</term><term>Maladie chronique ()</term><term>Maladie chronique (épidémiologie)</term><term>Médecins de famille (normes)</term><term>Médecins de famille (organisation et administration)</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Qualité des soins de santé ()</term><term>Qualité des soins de santé (économie)</term><term>Recherche sur les services de santé</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Services de médecine préventive ()</term><term>Services de médecine préventive (normes)</term><term>Tests diagnostiques courants ()</term><term>Tests diagnostiques courants (normes)</term><term>Types de pratiques des médecins ()</term><term>Études ergonomiques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Quality of Health Care</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Chronic Disease</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Dossiers médicaux</term><term>Dossiers médicaux électroniques</term><term>Médecins de famille</term><term>Services de médecine préventive</term><term>Tests diagnostiques courants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organisation et administration" xml:lang="fr"><term>Médecins de famille</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organization & administration" xml:lang="en"><term>Physicians, Family</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Chronic Disease</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</term><term>Electronic Health Records</term><term>Medical Records</term><term>Physicians, Family</term><term>Preventive Health Services</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Diagnostic Tests, Routine</term><term>Electronic Health Records</term><term>Medical Audit</term><term>Practice Patterns, Physicians'</term><term>Preventive Health Services</term><term>Quality of Health Care</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="économie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Qualité des soins de santé</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Maladie chronique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Comorbidity</term><term>Databases, Factual</term><term>Diagnosis-Related Groups</term><term>Female</term><term>Health Services Research</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Quality Indicators, Health Care</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Time and Motion Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Audit médical</term><term>Bases de données factuelles</term><term>Comorbidité</term><term>Dossiers médicaux électroniques</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Groupes homogènes de malades</term><term>Humains</term><term>Indicateurs qualité santé</term><term>Maladie chronique</term><term>Ontario</term><term>Qualité des soins de santé</term><term>Recherche sur les services de santé</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Services de médecine préventive</term><term>Tests diagnostiques courants</term><term>Types de pratiques des médecins</term><term>Études ergonomiques</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Improvements in the quality of health care services are often measured using data present in medical records. Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) contain potentially valuable new sources of health data. However, data quality in EMRs may not be optimal and should be assessed. Data reliability (are the same data elements being measured over time?) is a prerequisite for data validity (are the data accurate?). Our objective was to measure the reliability of data for preventive services in primary care EMRs during the transition to EMR.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Our data sources were randomly selected eligible patients' medical records and data obtained from provincial administrative datasets. Eighteen community-based family physicians in Toronto, Ontario that implemented EMRs starting in 2006 participated in this study. We measured the proportion of patients eligible for a service (Pap smear, screening mammogram or influenza vaccination) that received the service. We compared the change in rates of selected preventive services calculated from the medical record audits with the change in administrative datasets.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>In the first year of EMR use (2006) services decreased by 8.7% more (95% CI -11.0%- - 6.4%, p < 0.0001) when measured through medical record audits as compared with administrative datasets. Services increased by 2.4% more (95% CI 0%-4.9%, p = 0.05) in the medical record audits during the second year of EMR use (2007).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>There were differences between the change measured through medical record audits and administrative datasets. Problems could include difficulties with organizing new data entry processes as well as continued use of both paper and EMRs. Data extracted from EMRs had limited reliability during the initial phase of EMR implementation. Unreliable data interferes with the ability to measure and improve health care quality.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22583552</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>01</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1472-6963</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>12</Volume><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>May</Month><Day>14</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>BMC health services research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>BMC Health Serv Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>116</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1186/1472-6963-12-116</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Improvements in the quality of health care services are often measured using data present in medical records. Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) contain potentially valuable new sources of health data. However, data quality in EMRs may not be optimal and should be assessed. Data reliability (are the same data elements being measured over time?) is a prerequisite for data validity (are the data accurate?). Our objective was to measure the reliability of data for preventive services in primary care EMRs during the transition to EMR.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Our data sources were randomly selected eligible patients' medical records and data obtained from provincial administrative datasets. Eighteen community-based family physicians in Toronto, Ontario that implemented EMRs starting in 2006 participated in this study. We measured the proportion of patients eligible for a service (Pap smear, screening mammogram or influenza vaccination) that received the service. We compared the change in rates of selected preventive services calculated from the medical record audits with the change in administrative datasets.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">In the first year of EMR use (2006) services decreased by 8.7% more (95% CI -11.0%- - 6.4%, p < 0.0001) when measured through medical record audits as compared with administrative datasets. Services increased by 2.4% more (95% CI 0%-4.9%, p = 0.05) in the medical record audits during the second year of EMR use (2007).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">There were differences between the change measured through medical record audits and administrative datasets. Problems could include difficulties with organizing new data entry processes as well as continued use of both paper and EMRs. Data extracted from EMRs had limited reliability during the initial phase of EMR implementation. Unreliable data interferes with the ability to measure and improve health care quality.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Greiver</LastName><ForeName>Michelle</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Duncan Mill Road, Suite 705, Toronto, ON, Canada. mgreiver@rogers.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Barnsley</LastName><ForeName>Jan</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Glazier</LastName><ForeName>Richard H</ForeName><Initials>RH</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Harvey</LastName><ForeName>Bart J</ForeName><Initials>BJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Moineddin</LastName><ForeName>Rahim</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>14</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>BMC Health Serv Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101088677</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1472-6963</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002908" MajorTopicYN="N">Chronic Disease</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="N">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015897" MajorTopicYN="N">Comorbidity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016208" MajorTopicYN="N">Databases, Factual</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003953" MajorTopicYN="N">Diagnosis-Related Groups</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003955" MajorTopicYN="N">Diagnostic Tests, Routine</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="N">standards</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057286" MajorTopicYN="N">Electronic Health Records</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006302" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Services Research</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008485" MajorTopicYN="N">Medical Audit</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008499" MajorTopicYN="N">Medical Records</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009864" MajorTopicYN="N">Ontario</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010821" MajorTopicYN="N">Physicians, Family</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000458" MajorTopicYN="N">organization & administration</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010818" MajorTopicYN="N">Practice Patterns, Physicians'</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011314" MajorTopicYN="N">Preventive Health Services</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019984" MajorTopicYN="Y">Quality Indicators, Health Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011787" MajorTopicYN="N">Quality of Health Care</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013996" MajorTopicYN="N">Time and Motion Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2012</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>14</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22583552</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">1472-6963-12-116</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1472-6963-12-116</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3442990</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):486-96</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17259444</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am Heart J. 2008 Feb;155(2):324-31</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18215604</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 2003 Jan 22-29;289(4):434-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12533122</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>COPD. 2009 Oct;6(5):388-94</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19863368</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):181-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8731627</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):396-412</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15249528</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1820-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11025835</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care. 2004 Oct;42(10):960-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15377928</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Med Qual. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):438-44</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18006424</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fam Pract. 2006 Oct;23(5):529-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16868006</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Circulation. 2008 Feb 26;117(8):1028-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18299512</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 7;136(9):641-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11992299</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fam Pract. 2008 Aug;25(4):213-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18694896</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):78-86</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14527973</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Inform Prim Care. 2006;14(4):235-41; discussion 242-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17504576</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Med Qual. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):385-94</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19482968</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):512-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11874939</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>CMAJ. 2009 May 26;180(11):E72-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19468106</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15755945</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):828-36</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15609736</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMJ. 1991 Mar 30;302(6779):766-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">2021768</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1070</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12750210</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1147-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16540615</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Jul-Aug;17(4):32-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9691545</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Can Respir J. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):183-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20011725</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Public Health Med. 2000 Jun;22(2):198-201</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10912559</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>CMAJ. 2005 Sep 27;173(7):725, 727</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16186566</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Arch Intern Med. 2000 Feb 14;160(3):301-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10668831</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 May-Jun;6(3):245-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10332657</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):412-22</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19587256</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Popul Trends. 1997 Spring;(87):36-40</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9134574</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Can Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;57(10):e381-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21998246</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Open Med. 2007 Apr 14;1(1):e18-26</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20101286</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care. 1976 May;14(5):377-91</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1271879</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):549-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17938393</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Dec;66(6):611-38</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19279318</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care. 2005 Jul;43(7):691-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15970784</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):1000-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9749483</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Oct;67(5):503-27</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20150441</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Canada</li></country><region><li>Ontario</li></region><settlement><li>Toronto</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Toronto</li></orgName></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Barnsley, Jan" sort="Barnsley, Jan" uniqKey="Barnsley J" first="Jan" last="Barnsley">Jan Barnsley</name><name sortKey="Glazier, Richard H" sort="Glazier, Richard H" uniqKey="Glazier R" first="Richard H" last="Glazier">Richard H. Glazier</name><name sortKey="Harvey, Bart J" sort="Harvey, Bart J" uniqKey="Harvey B" first="Bart J" last="Harvey">Bart J. Harvey</name><name sortKey="Moineddin, Rahim" sort="Moineddin, Rahim" uniqKey="Moineddin R" first="Rahim" last="Moineddin">Rahim Moineddin</name></noCountry><country name="Canada"><region name="Ontario"><name sortKey="Greiver, Michelle" sort="Greiver, Michelle" uniqKey="Greiver M" first="Michelle" last="Greiver">Michelle Greiver</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/GrippeCanadaV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000428 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000428 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= GrippeCanadaV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22583552
|texte= Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22583552" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeCanadaV3
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |