Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings.
Identifieur interne : 000145 ( Main/Corpus ); précédent : 000144; suivant : 000146Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings.
Auteurs : B A Lehmann ; R A C. Ruiter ; D. Van Dam ; S. Wicker ; G. KokSource :
- The Journal of hospital infection [ 1532-2939 ] ; 2015.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Belgium, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Germany, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Personnel (psychology), Hospitals, Humans, Influenza Vaccines (administration & dosage), Influenza, Human (prevention & control), Influenza, Human (psychology), Intention, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vaccination (psychology), Young Adult.
- MESH :
- chemical , administration & dosage : Influenza Vaccines.
- geographic : Belgium, Germany, Netherlands.
- prevention & control : Influenza, Human.
- psychology : Health Personnel, Influenza, Human, Vaccination.
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Hospitals, Humans, Intention, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is recommended to prevent the transmission of influenza to vulnerable patients. Nevertheless, vaccination coverage rates of HCWs in European countries have been low.
AIM
To investigate the relative and combined strength of sociocognitive variables, from past research, theory and a qualitative study, in explaining the motivation of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine.
METHODS
An anonymous, online questionnaire was distributed among HCWs in hospital settings in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands between February and April 2013.
FINDINGS
Attitude and past vaccination uptake explained a considerable amount of variance in the intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine. Moreover, low perceived social norms, omission bias, low moral norms, being older, having no patient contact, and being Belgian or Dutch (compared with German) increased the probability of having no intention to receive the influenza vaccine compared with being undecided about vaccination. High intention to receive the influenza vaccine was shown to be more likely than being undecided about vaccination when HCWs had high perceived susceptibility of contracting influenza, low naturalistic views, and lower motivation to receive the vaccine solely for self-protection.
CONCLUSION
Country-specific interventions and a focus on different sociocognitive variables depending on the intention/lack of intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine may be beneficial to promote vaccination uptake.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.009
PubMed: 25586987
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25586987Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings.</title><author><name sortKey="Lehmann, B A" sort="Lehmann, B A" uniqKey="Lehmann B" first="B A" last="Lehmann">B A Lehmann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: birthe.lehmann@maastrichtuniversity.nl.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ruiter, R A C" sort="Ruiter, R A C" uniqKey="Ruiter R" first="R A C" last="Ruiter">R A C. Ruiter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Dam, D" sort="Van Dam, D" uniqKey="Van Dam D" first="D" last="Van Dam">D. Van Dam</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Orbis Medisch en Zorgconcern, Sittard, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wicker, S" sort="Wicker, S" uniqKey="Wicker S" first="S" last="Wicker">S. Wicker</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Betriebsärztlicher Dienst, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kok, G" sort="Kok, G" uniqKey="Kok G" first="G" last="Kok">G. Kok</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25586987</idno><idno type="pmid">25586987</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.009</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000145</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000145</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings.</title><author><name sortKey="Lehmann, B A" sort="Lehmann, B A" uniqKey="Lehmann B" first="B A" last="Lehmann">B A Lehmann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: birthe.lehmann@maastrichtuniversity.nl.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ruiter, R A C" sort="Ruiter, R A C" uniqKey="Ruiter R" first="R A C" last="Ruiter">R A C. Ruiter</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Dam, D" sort="Van Dam, D" uniqKey="Van Dam D" first="D" last="Van Dam">D. Van Dam</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Orbis Medisch en Zorgconcern, Sittard, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wicker, S" sort="Wicker, S" uniqKey="Wicker S" first="S" last="Wicker">S. Wicker</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Betriebsärztlicher Dienst, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kok, G" sort="Kok, G" uniqKey="Kok G" first="G" last="Kok">G. Kok</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of hospital infection</title><idno type="eISSN">1532-2939</idno><imprint><date when="2015" type="published">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Belgium</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Germany</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</term><term>Health Personnel (psychology)</term><term>Hospitals</term><term>Humans</term><term>Influenza Vaccines (administration & dosage)</term><term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term><term>Influenza, Human (psychology)</term><term>Intention</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Netherlands</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Vaccination (psychology)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="administration & dosage" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza Vaccines</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Belgium</term><term>Germany</term><term>Netherlands</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Health Personnel</term><term>Influenza, Human</term><term>Vaccination</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term><term>Cognition</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</term><term>Hospitals</term><term>Humans</term><term>Intention</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is recommended to prevent the transmission of influenza to vulnerable patients. Nevertheless, vaccination coverage rates of HCWs in European countries have been low.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>AIM</b></p><p>To investigate the relative and combined strength of sociocognitive variables, from past research, theory and a qualitative study, in explaining the motivation of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>An anonymous, online questionnaire was distributed among HCWs in hospital settings in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands between February and April 2013.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>FINDINGS</b></p><p>Attitude and past vaccination uptake explained a considerable amount of variance in the intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine. Moreover, low perceived social norms, omission bias, low moral norms, being older, having no patient contact, and being Belgian or Dutch (compared with German) increased the probability of having no intention to receive the influenza vaccine compared with being undecided about vaccination. High intention to receive the influenza vaccine was shown to be more likely than being undecided about vaccination when HCWs had high perceived susceptibility of contracting influenza, low naturalistic views, and lower motivation to receive the vaccine solely for self-protection.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>Country-specific interventions and a focus on different sociocognitive variables depending on the intention/lack of intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine may be beneficial to promote vaccination uptake.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">25586987</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1532-2939</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>89</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2015</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of hospital infection</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Hosp. Infect.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>202-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.009</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">S0195-6701(14)00374-0</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is recommended to prevent the transmission of influenza to vulnerable patients. Nevertheless, vaccination coverage rates of HCWs in European countries have been low.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="AIM" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To investigate the relative and combined strength of sociocognitive variables, from past research, theory and a qualitative study, in explaining the motivation of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">An anonymous, online questionnaire was distributed among HCWs in hospital settings in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands between February and April 2013.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="FINDINGS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Attitude and past vaccination uptake explained a considerable amount of variance in the intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine. Moreover, low perceived social norms, omission bias, low moral norms, being older, having no patient contact, and being Belgian or Dutch (compared with German) increased the probability of having no intention to receive the influenza vaccine compared with being undecided about vaccination. High intention to receive the influenza vaccine was shown to be more likely than being undecided about vaccination when HCWs had high perceived susceptibility of contracting influenza, low naturalistic views, and lower motivation to receive the vaccine solely for self-protection.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Country-specific interventions and a focus on different sociocognitive variables depending on the intention/lack of intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine may be beneficial to promote vaccination uptake.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lehmann</LastName><ForeName>B A</ForeName><Initials>BA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: birthe.lehmann@maastrichtuniversity.nl.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ruiter</LastName><ForeName>R A C</ForeName><Initials>RA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Dam</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Orbis Medisch en Zorgconcern, Sittard, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wicker</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Betriebsärztlicher Dienst, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kok</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2014</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>16</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Hosp Infect</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8007166</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0195-6701</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007252">Influenza Vaccines</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001291" MajorTopicYN="N">Attitude of Health Personnel</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001530" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Belgium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003071" MajorTopicYN="N">Cognition</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005858" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Germany</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007722" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006282" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Personnel</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006761" MajorTopicYN="N">Hospitals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007252" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza Vaccines</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000008" MajorTopicYN="Y">administration & dosage</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D033182" MajorTopicYN="N">Intention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009426" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Netherlands</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014611" MajorTopicYN="N">Vaccination</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Healthcare personnel</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Hospital</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza vaccination</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Sociocognitive predictors</Keyword></KeywordList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2014</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>19</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2014</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2015</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2015</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25586987</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0195-6701(14)00374-0</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.009</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/GrippeAllemagneV3/Data/Main/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000145 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000145 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= GrippeAllemagneV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25586987
|texte= Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25586987" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeAllemagneV3
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |