A comparison of two methods for recording the retruded jaw relation in edentulous subjects.
Identifieur interne : 003E71 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 003E70; suivant : 003E72A comparison of two methods for recording the retruded jaw relation in edentulous subjects.
Auteurs : M. Bishop [Royaume-Uni] ; D J LambSource :
- The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry [ 0965-7452 ] ; 1997.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- diagnostic : Bouche édentée.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Bouche édentée.
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Enregistrement des rapports intermaxillaires, Femelle, Humains, Mâle, Prothèse dentaire complète, Sujet âgé.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- diagnosis : Mouth, Edentulous.
- methods : Denture Design, Jaw Relation Record.
- rehabilitation : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Aged, Denture, Complete, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged.
Abstract
The purpose of this study on 19 edentulous patients was to compare the retruded jaw relations recorded on wax rims at the registration stage with those recorded on finished dentures at insertion. An intra-oral centre-point trace served as the reference point for both sets of measurements. Results showed the two techniques to give mean retruded positions 0.25 mm apart in the occlusal-sagittal plane, but the distributions of the two sets of results differed; those recorded on finished dentures had greater precision, with smaller range and standard deviation. The work confirms the usefulness of a post insertion check record carried out on complete dentures to minimise any occlusal errors introduced at the registration stage.
PubMed: 9594732
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003E71
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:9594732Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of two methods for recording the retruded jaw relation in edentulous subjects.</title><author><name sortKey="Bishop, M" sort="Bishop, M" uniqKey="Bishop M" first="M" last="Bishop">M. Bishop</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Sheffield School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Sheffield School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lamb, D J" sort="Lamb, D J" uniqKey="Lamb D" first="D J" last="Lamb">D J Lamb</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1997">1997</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:9594732</idno><idno type="pmid">9594732</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003E71</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003E71</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003E71</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003E71</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of two methods for recording the retruded jaw relation in edentulous subjects.</title><author><name sortKey="Bishop, M" sort="Bishop, M" uniqKey="Bishop M" first="M" last="Bishop">M. Bishop</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Sheffield School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, UK.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Sheffield School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lamb, D J" sort="Lamb, D J" uniqKey="Lamb D" first="D J" last="Lamb">D J Lamb</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">0965-7452</idno><imprint><date when="1997" type="published">1997</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Denture Design (methods)</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw Relation Record (methods)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (diagnosis)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Bouche édentée (diagnostic)</term><term>Bouche édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire ()</term><term>Enregistrement des rapports intermaxillaires ()</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Sujet âgé</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Design</term><term>Jaw Relation Record</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Bouche édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Enregistrement des rapports intermaxillaires</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Sujet âgé</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study on 19 edentulous patients was to compare the retruded jaw relations recorded on wax rims at the registration stage with those recorded on finished dentures at insertion. An intra-oral centre-point trace served as the reference point for both sets of measurements. Results showed the two techniques to give mean retruded positions 0.25 mm apart in the occlusal-sagittal plane, but the distributions of the two sets of results differed; those recorded on finished dentures had greater precision, with smaller range and standard deviation. The work confirms the usefulness of a post insertion check record carried out on complete dentures to minimise any occlusal errors introduced at the registration stage.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">9594732</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1998</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0965-7452</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>5</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1997</Year><Month>Mar</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparison of two methods for recording the retruded jaw relation in edentulous subjects.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>11-5</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The purpose of this study on 19 edentulous patients was to compare the retruded jaw relations recorded on wax rims at the registration stage with those recorded on finished dentures at insertion. An intra-oral centre-point trace served as the reference point for both sets of measurements. Results showed the two techniques to give mean retruded positions 0.25 mm apart in the occlusal-sagittal plane, but the distributions of the two sets of results differed; those recorded on finished dentures had greater precision, with smaller range and standard deviation. The work confirms the usefulness of a post insertion check record carried out on complete dentures to minimise any occlusal errors introduced at the registration stage.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bishop</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Sheffield School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, UK.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lamb</LastName><ForeName>D J</ForeName><Initials>DJ</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9314899</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0965-7452</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003779" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Design</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003824" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Complete</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007574" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw Relation Record</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnosis</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1997</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1998</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>22</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1997</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9594732</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003E71 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003E71 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:9594732
|texte= A comparison of two methods for recording the retruded jaw relation in edentulous subjects.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9594732" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |