Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Identifieur interne : 003C99 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 003C98; suivant : 003D00Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
Auteurs : A B Carr [États-Unis] ; D A Gerard ; P E LarsenSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 0882-2786 ]
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Alliage dentaire (), Analyse de variance, Animaux, Cicatrisation de plaie, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Durapatite (), Femelle, Implants dentaires, Mandibule (), Mandibule (anatomopathologie), Matériaux biocompatibles (), Maxillaire (), Maxillaire (anatomopathologie), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâchoire édentée (anatomopathologie), Ostéo-intégration, Papio, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Propriétés de surface, Titane (), Études de suivi.
- MESH :
- anatomopathologie : Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâchoire édentée.
- Alliage dentaire, Analyse de variance, Animaux, Cicatrisation de plaie, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Contrainte mécanique, Durapatite, Femelle, Implants dentaires, Mandibule, Matériaux biocompatibles, Maxillaire, Mâchoire édentée, Ostéo-intégration, Papio, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Propriétés de surface, Titane, Études de suivi.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Biocompatible Materials (chemistry), Dental Alloys (chemistry), Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Durapatite (chemistry), Female, Follow-Up Studies, Jaw, Edentulous (pathology), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mandible (pathology), Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (pathology), Maxilla (surgery), Osseointegration, Papio, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Titanium (chemistry), Wound Healing.
- MESH :
- chemical , chemistry : Biocompatible Materials, Dental Alloys, Durapatite, Titanium.
- pathology : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Osseointegration, Papio, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Wound Healing.
Abstract
Important to the understanding of the dynamics associated with dental implant anchorage over time is a knowledge of the supporting anatomy for common endosseous implants prior to being placed into function. This study followed 20 screw-shaped dental implants placed in edentulated (2 months' healing time) posterior jaws of five adult female baboons. Implants made of three biomaterials were placed and allowed to heal for 3 months prior to processing for evaluation. Percentage integration and bone area data from six horizontal sections along the entire length of each implant were collected and analyzed for differences between jaws, implant biomaterials, jaw/biomaterial, and sections of the implants (ANOVA, pairwise comparison using LSM with Bonferroni adjustment). The results indicated that overall mean percentage integration was 46.5 and mean percentage bone area was 39.9. Maxillary and mandibular differences for both parameters were statistically different (integration: maxillary = 38.1%, mandibular = 56.7%; bone area: maxillary = 35.8%, mandibular = 44.9%; both were significant at the P < .05 level). The biomaterial analyses revealed significant differences for percentage integration between the metal implants and the hydroxyapatite-coated implant (commercially pure titanium = 39.1%, titanium-aluminum-vanadium = 40.0%, hydroxyapatite-coated = 61.5%), but no such difference was noted for percentage bone area (commercially pure titanium = 38.8%, titanium-aluminum-vanadium = 38.9%, hydroxyapatite-coated = 42.3%). Discussion of the relative importance of the two parameters highlights the fact that resistance to functional loads requires establishing and then maintaining an adequate volume of bone, which may have a functionally specific structure based on the mechanical properties of the local jaw environment.
PubMed: 9425758
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003C99
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:9425758Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.</title><author><name sortKey="Carr, A B" sort="Carr, A B" uniqKey="Carr A" first="A B" last="Carr">A B Carr</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus 43210-1241, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus 43210-1241</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gerard, D A" sort="Gerard, D A" uniqKey="Gerard D" first="D A" last="Gerard">D A Gerard</name></author><author><name sortKey="Larsen, P E" sort="Larsen, P E" uniqKey="Larsen P" first="P E" last="Larsen">P E Larsen</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>1997 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:9425758</idno><idno type="pmid">9425758</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003C99</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003C99</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003C99</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003C99</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.</title><author><name sortKey="Carr, A B" sort="Carr, A B" uniqKey="Carr A" first="A B" last="Carr">A B Carr</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus 43210-1241, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus 43210-1241</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gerard, D A" sort="Gerard, D A" uniqKey="Gerard D" first="D A" last="Gerard">D A Gerard</name></author><author><name sortKey="Larsen, P E" sort="Larsen, P E" uniqKey="Larsen P" first="P E" last="Larsen">P E Larsen</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="ISSN">0882-2786</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Animals</term><term>Biocompatible Materials (chemistry)</term><term>Dental Alloys (chemistry)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Durapatite (chemistry)</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (pathology)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (pathology)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (pathology)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Papio</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Titanium (chemistry)</term><term>Wound Healing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Alliage dentaire ()</term><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Animaux</term><term>Cicatrisation de plaie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Durapatite ()</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mandibule (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Matériaux biocompatibles ()</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Maxillaire (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (anatomopathologie)</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Papio</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Titane ()</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="chemistry" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Dental Alloys</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomopathologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Animals</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Papio</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Wound Healing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Alliage dentaire</term><term>Analyse de variance</term><term>Animaux</term><term>Cicatrisation de plaie</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Contrainte mécanique</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Matériaux biocompatibles</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Papio</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Titane</term><term>Études de suivi</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Important to the understanding of the dynamics associated with dental implant anchorage over time is a knowledge of the supporting anatomy for common endosseous implants prior to being placed into function. This study followed 20 screw-shaped dental implants placed in edentulated (2 months' healing time) posterior jaws of five adult female baboons. Implants made of three biomaterials were placed and allowed to heal for 3 months prior to processing for evaluation. Percentage integration and bone area data from six horizontal sections along the entire length of each implant were collected and analyzed for differences between jaws, implant biomaterials, jaw/biomaterial, and sections of the implants (ANOVA, pairwise comparison using LSM with Bonferroni adjustment). The results indicated that overall mean percentage integration was 46.5 and mean percentage bone area was 39.9. Maxillary and mandibular differences for both parameters were statistically different (integration: maxillary = 38.1%, mandibular = 56.7%; bone area: maxillary = 35.8%, mandibular = 44.9%; both were significant at the P < .05 level). The biomaterial analyses revealed significant differences for percentage integration between the metal implants and the hydroxyapatite-coated implant (commercially pure titanium = 39.1%, titanium-aluminum-vanadium = 40.0%, hydroxyapatite-coated = 61.5%), but no such difference was noted for percentage bone area (commercially pure titanium = 38.8%, titanium-aluminum-vanadium = 38.9%, hydroxyapatite-coated = 42.3%). Discussion of the relative importance of the two parameters highlights the fact that resistance to functional loads requires establishing and then maintaining an adequate volume of bone, which may have a functionally specific structure based on the mechanical properties of the local jaw environment.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">9425758</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1998</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0882-2786</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>12</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>1997 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>777-84</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Important to the understanding of the dynamics associated with dental implant anchorage over time is a knowledge of the supporting anatomy for common endosseous implants prior to being placed into function. This study followed 20 screw-shaped dental implants placed in edentulated (2 months' healing time) posterior jaws of five adult female baboons. Implants made of three biomaterials were placed and allowed to heal for 3 months prior to processing for evaluation. Percentage integration and bone area data from six horizontal sections along the entire length of each implant were collected and analyzed for differences between jaws, implant biomaterials, jaw/biomaterial, and sections of the implants (ANOVA, pairwise comparison using LSM with Bonferroni adjustment). The results indicated that overall mean percentage integration was 46.5 and mean percentage bone area was 39.9. Maxillary and mandibular differences for both parameters were statistically different (integration: maxillary = 38.1%, mandibular = 56.7%; bone area: maxillary = 35.8%, mandibular = 44.9%; both were significant at the P < .05 level). The biomaterial analyses revealed significant differences for percentage integration between the metal implants and the hydroxyapatite-coated implant (commercially pure titanium = 39.1%, titanium-aluminum-vanadium = 40.0%, hydroxyapatite-coated = 61.5%), but no such difference was noted for percentage bone area (commercially pure titanium = 38.8%, titanium-aluminum-vanadium = 38.9%, hydroxyapatite-coated = 42.3%). Discussion of the relative importance of the two parameters highlights the fact that resistance to functional loads requires establishing and then maintaining an adequate volume of bone, which may have a functionally specific structure based on the mechanical properties of the local jaw environment.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Carr</LastName><ForeName>A B</ForeName><Initials>AB</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, Columbus 43210-1241, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gerard</LastName><ForeName>D A</ForeName><Initials>DA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Larsen</LastName><ForeName>P E</ForeName><Initials>PE</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D001672">Biocompatible Materials</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003722">Dental Alloys</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>12743-70-3</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C031462">titanium alloy (TiAl6V4)</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>91D9GV0Z28</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D017886">Durapatite</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>D1JT611TNE</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014025">Titanium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001672" MajorTopicYN="N">Biocompatible Materials</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003722" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Alloys</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017886" MajorTopicYN="N">Durapatite</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="N">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010215" MajorTopicYN="N">Papio</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014025" MajorTopicYN="N">Titanium</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000737" MajorTopicYN="N">chemistry</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014945" MajorTopicYN="N">Wound Healing</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1998</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1998</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1998</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9425758</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003C99 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003C99 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:9425758
|texte= Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9425758" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |