An evaluation of differences and similarities observed in fixture failure of five distinct implant systems.
Identifieur interne : 003B01 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 003B00; suivant : 003B02An evaluation of differences and similarities observed in fixture failure of five distinct implant systems.
Auteurs : E S Rosenberg [États-Unis] ; J. TorosianSource :
- Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD [ 1042-2722 ] ; 1998.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Analyse de panne d'appareillage, Bouche édentée (), Conception de prothèse dentaire, Facteurs temps, Humains, Implants dentaires (effets indésirables), Loi du khi-deux, Mâchoire édentée (), Ostéo-intégration, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Résorption alvéolaire (étiologie), Échec de restauration dentaire.
- MESH :
- effets indésirables : Implants dentaires.
- étiologie : Résorption alvéolaire.
- Analyse de panne d'appareillage, Bouche édentée, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Facteurs temps, Humains, Loi du khi-deux, Mâchoire édentée, Ostéo-intégration, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Échec de restauration dentaire.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology), Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants (adverse effects), Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Restoration Failure, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mouth, Edentulous (surgery), Osseointegration, Patient Care Planning, Time Factors.
- MESH :
- chemical , adverse effects : Dental Implants.
- etiology : Alveolar Bone Loss.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mouth, Edentulous.
- Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Restoration Failure, Equipment Failure Analysis, Humans, Osseointegration, Patient Care Planning, Time Factors.
Abstract
While the long-term success of osseointegrated implants has been demonstrated in the dental literature, implant failure does occur as a result of various factors. The purpose of this investigation was to identify clinical and/or microbiological differences associated with failure in five implant systems. At the conclusion of this 7.5-year investigation, 67 of 958 implants were determined to have failed. An overall failure rate of 7.0% was evident in this study, which, depending on the particular system, ranged from 4.7% to 15.2%.
PubMed: 9759042
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003B01
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:9759042Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An evaluation of differences and similarities observed in fixture failure of five distinct implant systems.</title><author><name sortKey="Rosenberg, E S" sort="Rosenberg, E S" uniqKey="Rosenberg E" first="E S" last="Rosenberg">E S Rosenberg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Implant Dentistry, New York University, New York, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Implant Dentistry, New York University, New York</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Torosian, J" sort="Torosian, J" uniqKey="Torosian J" first="J" last="Torosian">J. Torosian</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1998">1998</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:9759042</idno><idno type="pmid">9759042</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003B01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003B01</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003B01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003B01</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">An evaluation of differences and similarities observed in fixture failure of five distinct implant systems.</title><author><name sortKey="Rosenberg, E S" sort="Rosenberg, E S" uniqKey="Rosenberg E" first="E S" last="Rosenberg">E S Rosenberg</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Implant Dentistry, New York University, New York, USA.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Implant Dentistry, New York University, New York</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Torosian, J" sort="Torosian, J" uniqKey="Torosian J" first="J" last="Torosian">J. Torosian</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD</title><idno type="ISSN">1042-2722</idno><imprint><date when="1998" type="published">1998</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (etiology)</term><term>Chi-Square Distribution</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants (adverse effects)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Equipment Failure Analysis</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de panne d'appareillage</term><term>Bouche édentée ()</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires (effets indésirables)</term><term>Loi du khi-deux</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire (étiologie)</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Implants dentaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="étiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Chi-Square Distribution</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Equipment Failure Analysis</term><term>Humans</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de panne d'appareillage</term><term>Bouche édentée</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Facteurs temps</term><term>Humains</term><term>Loi du khi-deux</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Ostéo-intégration</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">While the long-term success of osseointegrated implants has been demonstrated in the dental literature, implant failure does occur as a result of various factors. The purpose of this investigation was to identify clinical and/or microbiological differences associated with failure in five implant systems. At the conclusion of this 7.5-year investigation, 67 of 958 implants were determined to have failed. An overall failure rate of 7.0% was evident in this study, which, depending on the particular system, ranged from 4.7% to 15.2%.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">9759042</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1998</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>05</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1042-2722</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>10</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><Year>1998</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>An evaluation of differences and similarities observed in fixture failure of five distinct implant systems.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>687-98; quiz 700</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>While the long-term success of osseointegrated implants has been demonstrated in the dental literature, implant failure does occur as a result of various factors. The purpose of this investigation was to identify clinical and/or microbiological differences associated with failure in five implant systems. At the conclusion of this 7.5-year investigation, 67 of 958 implants were determined to have failed. An overall failure rate of 7.0% was evident in this study, which, depending on the particular system, ranged from 4.7% to 15.2%.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rosenberg</LastName><ForeName>E S</ForeName><Initials>ES</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Implant Dentistry, New York University, New York, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Torosian</LastName><ForeName>J</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9002247</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1042-2722</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016009" MajorTopicYN="N">Chi-Square Distribution</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019544" MajorTopicYN="N">Equipment Failure Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1998</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>6</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1998</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1998</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9759042</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003B01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:9759042
|texte= An evaluation of differences and similarities observed in fixture failure of five distinct implant systems.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9759042" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |