Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results.
Identifieur interne : 003A21 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 003A20; suivant : 003A22Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results.
Auteurs : R H Batenburg [Pays-Bas] ; H J Meijer ; G M Raghoebar ; R P Van Oort ; G. BoeringSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1998.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de variance, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires (), Indice de plaque dentaire, Maladies de la lèvre (), Maladies parodontales (), Maladies parodontales (imagerie diagnostique), Mandibule (), Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique), Menton, Mâchoire édentée (), Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Mâle, Overdenture, Poche parodontale (), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Radiographie, Récession gingivale (), Résorption osseuse (), Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Statistique non paramétrique, Sujet âgé, Troubles sensitifs (), Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études prospectives.
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Maladies parodontales, Mandibule, Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse de variance, Femelle, Humains, Implants dentaires, Indice de plaque dentaire, Maladies de la lèvre, Maladies parodontales, Mandibule, Menton, Mâchoire édentée, Mâle, Overdenture, Poche parodontale, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Radiographie, Récession gingivale, Résorption osseuse, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Statistique non paramétrique, Sujet âgé, Troubles sensitifs, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études prospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Bone Resorption (classification), Chin, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants (classification), Dental Plaque Index, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gingival Recession (classification), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Lip Diseases (classification), Male, Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Periodontal Diseases (classification), Periodontal Diseases (diagnostic imaging), Periodontal Pocket (classification), Prospective Studies, Radiography, Sensation Disorders (classification), Statistics, Nonparametric.
- MESH :
- chemical , classification : Dental Implants.
- classification : Bone Resorption, Gingival Recession, Lip Diseases, Periodontal Diseases, Periodontal Pocket, Sensation Disorders.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Periodontal Diseases.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Chin, Dental Plaque Index, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radiography, Statistics, Nonparametric.
Abstract
The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the condition of the peri-implant tissues of three different implant systems supporting a mandibular overdenture. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class V-VI) participated in this study. After randomization, 30 patients were treated with 2 Brånemark implants, 30 patients with 2 IMZ implants and 30 patients with 2 ITI implants. The implants were inserted in the canine region of the mandible. After 3 months overdentures were fabricated supported by a round bar and clip attachment. A standardized clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed 0,6 and 12 months after insertion of the denture. The intraoral radiographs were made, using the long-cone technique with an aiming device. Two implants were lost (1 Brånemark, 1 IMZ) during the healing period. None of the patients showed any sensory change in lip or chin region. The pocket depth in the Brånemark group decreased significantly whereas the mucosa recession increased significantly in both the Brånemark as well as in the IMZ group. After 12 months, there was significantly less bone loss in the ITI group. From our study it was concluded that 2 (Brånemark, IMZ or ITI) implants placed in the interforaminal region connected with a bar supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the (Cawood V-VI) edentulous patient. The ITI implant appears to be the implant of choice for mandibular overdenture therapy, because only one operation is required for a comparable result.
PubMed: 11429939
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :003A21
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11429939Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Batenburg, R H" sort="Batenburg, R H" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="R H" last="Batenburg">R H Batenburg</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Dept of Oral and Maxillofac. Surg. and Maxillofacial Prosth., University Hospital Groningen, P. O. Box 30,001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. batenbur@worldonline.nl</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Dept of Oral and Maxillofac. Surg. and Maxillofacial Prosth., University Hospital Groningen, P. O. Box 30,001, 9700 RB Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R P" last="Van Oort">R P Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Boering, G" sort="Boering, G" uniqKey="Boering G" first="G" last="Boering">G. Boering</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="1998">1998</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11429939</idno>
<idno type="pmid">11429939</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003A21</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003A21</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">003A21</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">003A21</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Batenburg, R H" sort="Batenburg, R H" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="R H" last="Batenburg">R H Batenburg</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Dept of Oral and Maxillofac. Surg. and Maxillofacial Prosth., University Hospital Groningen, P. O. Box 30,001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. batenbur@worldonline.nl</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Dept of Oral and Maxillofac. Surg. and Maxillofacial Prosth., University Hospital Groningen, P. O. Box 30,001, 9700 RB Groningen</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Meijer, H J" sort="Meijer, H J" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="H J" last="Meijer">H J Meijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Oort, R P" sort="Van Oort, R P" uniqKey="Van Oort R" first="R P" last="Van Oort">R P Van Oort</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Boering, G" sort="Boering, G" uniqKey="Boering G" first="G" last="Boering">G. Boering</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<imprint><date when="1998" type="published">1998</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Bone Resorption (classification)</term>
<term>Chin</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term>
<term>Dental Implants (classification)</term>
<term>Dental Plaque Index</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture Retention</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Gingival Recession (classification)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term>
<term>Lip Diseases (classification)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Mandible (surgery)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Periodontal Diseases (classification)</term>
<term>Periodontal Diseases (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Periodontal Pocket (classification)</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Sensation Disorders (classification)</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires ()</term>
<term>Indice de plaque dentaire</term>
<term>Maladies de la lèvre ()</term>
<term>Maladies parodontales ()</term>
<term>Maladies parodontales (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Mandibule ()</term>
<term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Menton</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Poche parodontale ()</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Radiographie</term>
<term>Récession gingivale ()</term>
<term>Résorption osseuse ()</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Troubles sensitifs ()</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term>
<term>Gingival Recession</term>
<term>Lip Diseases</term>
<term>Periodontal Diseases</term>
<term>Periodontal Pocket</term>
<term>Sensation Disorders</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Periodontal Diseases</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Maladies parodontales</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Chin</term>
<term>Dental Plaque Index</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture Retention</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Prospective Studies</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse de variance</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Indice de plaque dentaire</term>
<term>Maladies de la lèvre</term>
<term>Maladies parodontales</term>
<term>Mandibule</term>
<term>Menton</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Poche parodontale</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Radiographie</term>
<term>Récession gingivale</term>
<term>Résorption osseuse</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Troubles sensitifs</term>
<term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
<term>Études prospectives</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the condition of the peri-implant tissues of three different implant systems supporting a mandibular overdenture. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class V-VI) participated in this study. After randomization, 30 patients were treated with 2 Brånemark implants, 30 patients with 2 IMZ implants and 30 patients with 2 ITI implants. The implants were inserted in the canine region of the mandible. After 3 months overdentures were fabricated supported by a round bar and clip attachment. A standardized clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed 0,6 and 12 months after insertion of the denture. The intraoral radiographs were made, using the long-cone technique with an aiming device. Two implants were lost (1 Brånemark, 1 IMZ) during the healing period. None of the patients showed any sensory change in lip or chin region. The pocket depth in the Brånemark group decreased significantly whereas the mucosa recession increased significantly in both the Brånemark as well as in the IMZ group. After 12 months, there was significantly less bone loss in the ITI group. From our study it was concluded that 2 (Brånemark, IMZ or ITI) implants placed in the interforaminal region connected with a bar supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the (Cawood V-VI) edentulous patient. The ITI implant appears to be the implant of choice for mandibular overdenture therapy, because only one operation is required for a comparable result.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11429939</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>19</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>9</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>1998</Year>
<Month>Dec</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>374-83</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this prospective comparative study was to evaluate the condition of the peri-implant tissues of three different implant systems supporting a mandibular overdenture. Ninety edentulous patients (Cawood class V-VI) participated in this study. After randomization, 30 patients were treated with 2 Brånemark implants, 30 patients with 2 IMZ implants and 30 patients with 2 ITI implants. The implants were inserted in the canine region of the mandible. After 3 months overdentures were fabricated supported by a round bar and clip attachment. A standardized clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed 0,6 and 12 months after insertion of the denture. The intraoral radiographs were made, using the long-cone technique with an aiming device. Two implants were lost (1 Brånemark, 1 IMZ) during the healing period. None of the patients showed any sensory change in lip or chin region. The pocket depth in the Brånemark group decreased significantly whereas the mucosa recession increased significantly in both the Brånemark as well as in the IMZ group. After 12 months, there was significantly less bone loss in the ITI group. From our study it was concluded that 2 (Brånemark, IMZ or ITI) implants placed in the interforaminal region connected with a bar supply a proper base for the support of a mandibular overdenture in the (Cawood V-VI) edentulous patient. The ITI implant appears to be the implant of choice for mandibular overdenture therapy, because only one operation is required for a comparable result.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Batenburg</LastName>
<ForeName>R H</ForeName>
<Initials>RH</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dept of Oral and Maxillofac. Surg. and Maxillofacial Prosth., University Hospital Groningen, P. O. Box 30,001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. batenbur@worldonline.nl</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Meijer</LastName>
<ForeName>H J</ForeName>
<Initials>HJ</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Raghoebar</LastName>
<ForeName>G M</ForeName>
<Initials>GM</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Van Oort</LastName>
<ForeName>R P</ForeName>
<Initials>RP</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Boering</LastName>
<ForeName>G</ForeName>
<Initials>G</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country>
<MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001862" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Resorption</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002680" MajorTopicYN="N">Chin</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="Y">classification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003774" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Plaque Index</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005889" MajorTopicYN="N">Gingival Recession</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008047" MajorTopicYN="N">Lip Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010510" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010514" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Pocket</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012678" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensation Disorders</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>7</Month>
<Day>20</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2001</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>30</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11429939</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003A21 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 003A21 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:11429939 |texte= Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11429939" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |