Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.
Identifieur interne : 002F86 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 002F85; suivant : 002F87Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.
Auteurs : Guido Heydecke [Canada] ; Pierre Boudrias ; Manal A. Awad ; Rubens F. De Albuquerque ; James P. Lund ; Jocelyne S. FeineSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2003.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse appariée, Attitude envers la santé, Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Dentisterie esthétique, Femelle, Humains, Hygiène buccodentaire, Implants dentaires, Mandibule (), Mastication (physiologie), Maxillaire (), Mâchoire édentée (), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Occlusion dentaire, Overdenture, Parole (physiologie), Prothèse dentaire complète, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Psychométrie, Satisfaction du patient, Statistique non paramétrique, Études croisées.
- MESH :
- physiologie : Mastication, Parole.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse appariée, Attitude envers la santé, Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Dentisterie esthétique, Femelle, Humains, Hygiène buccodentaire, Implants dentaires, Mandibule, Maxillaire, Mâchoire édentée, Mâle, Occlusion dentaire, Overdenture, Prothèse dentaire complète, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Psychométrie, Satisfaction du patient, Statistique non paramétrique, Études croisées.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Attitude to Health, Cross-Over Studies, Dental Implants, Dental Occlusion, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Design, Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (surgery), Mastication (physiology), Matched-Pair Analysis, Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Patient Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Speech (physiology), Statistics, Nonparametric.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- physiology : Mastication, Speech.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Attitude to Health, Cross-Over Studies, Dental Occlusion, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Design, Denture, Complete, Denture, Overlay, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Humans, Male, Matched-Pair Analysis, Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Patient Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Statistics, Nonparametric.
Abstract
Dental implants provide patients with restorative options for the edentulous maxilla. Both fixed and removable prostheses can be attached to the edentulous maxilla, but the efficacy of different designs has not been determined. In this two-session within-subject crossover trial we compared maxillary implant retained fixed prostheses with removable implant overdentures opposed by mandibular implant-supported overdentures. Sixteen patients, who had previously received mandibular implants, entered the study and received four to six maxillary implants. After dropouts as a consequence of a lack of osseointegration and general health problems, 13 remained. Of these, five received the removable prosthesis first and eight the fixed prosthesis. After 2 months, the prostheses were exchanged and the second was also worn for 2 months. Psychometric measurements of general satisfaction with the prostheses as well as comfort, ability to speak, stability, esthetics, ease of cleaning and occlusion were obtained once each prosthesis had been worn for 2 months. Chewing ability was assessed for seven types of food. Removable long-bar overdentures received significantly higher ratings of general satisfaction than fixed prostheses (P = 0.003). Patients also rated their ability to speak and ease of cleaning significantly better with the removable overdentures. Nine patients chose to keep the removable prosthesis and four preferred to keep the fixed prosthesis. The results suggest that maxillary removable overdentures on multiple implants may provide patients with better function than fixed prostheses.
PubMed: 12562375
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002F86
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12562375Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.</title><author><name sortKey="Heydecke, Guido" sort="Heydecke, Guido" uniqKey="Heydecke G" first="Guido" last="Heydecke">Guido Heydecke</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boudrias, Pierre" sort="Boudrias, Pierre" uniqKey="Boudrias P" first="Pierre" last="Boudrias">Pierre Boudrias</name></author><author><name sortKey="Awad, Manal A" sort="Awad, Manal A" uniqKey="Awad M" first="Manal A" last="Awad">Manal A. Awad</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Albuquerque, Rubens F" sort="De Albuquerque, Rubens F" uniqKey="De Albuquerque R" first="Rubens F" last="De Albuquerque">Rubens F. De Albuquerque</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lund, James P" sort="Lund, James P" uniqKey="Lund J" first="James P" last="Lund">James P. Lund</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, Jocelyne S" sort="Feine, Jocelyne S" uniqKey="Feine J" first="Jocelyne S" last="Feine">Jocelyne S. Feine</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2003">2003</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:12562375</idno><idno type="pmid">12562375</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002F86</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002F86</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002F86</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002F86</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.</title><author><name sortKey="Heydecke, Guido" sort="Heydecke, Guido" uniqKey="Heydecke G" first="Guido" last="Heydecke">Guido Heydecke</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boudrias, Pierre" sort="Boudrias, Pierre" uniqKey="Boudrias P" first="Pierre" last="Boudrias">Pierre Boudrias</name></author><author><name sortKey="Awad, Manal A" sort="Awad, Manal A" uniqKey="Awad M" first="Manal A" last="Awad">Manal A. Awad</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Albuquerque, Rubens F" sort="De Albuquerque, Rubens F" uniqKey="De Albuquerque R" first="Rubens F" last="De Albuquerque">Rubens F. De Albuquerque</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lund, James P" sort="Lund, James P" uniqKey="Lund J" first="James P" last="Lund">James P. Lund</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, Jocelyne S" sort="Feine, Jocelyne S" uniqKey="Feine J" first="Jocelyne S" last="Feine">Jocelyne S. Feine</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="2003" type="published">2003</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Cross-Over Studies</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Occlusion</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Mastication (physiology)</term><term>Matched-Pair Analysis</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oral Hygiene</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Psychometrics</term><term>Speech (physiology)</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse appariée</term><term>Attitude envers la santé</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Dentisterie esthétique</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Hygiène buccodentaire</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mastication (physiologie)</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Occlusion dentaire</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Parole (physiologie)</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Psychométrie</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Études croisées</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mastication</term><term>Parole</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Mastication</term><term>Speech</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Cross-Over Studies</term><term>Dental Occlusion</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture, Complete</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Esthetics, Dental</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Matched-Pair Analysis</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oral Hygiene</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Psychometrics</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Analyse appariée</term><term>Attitude envers la santé</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Dentisterie esthétique</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Hygiène buccodentaire</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Occlusion dentaire</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Prothèse dentaire complète</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Psychométrie</term><term>Satisfaction du patient</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Études croisées</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Dental implants provide patients with restorative options for the edentulous maxilla. Both fixed and removable prostheses can be attached to the edentulous maxilla, but the efficacy of different designs has not been determined. In this two-session within-subject crossover trial we compared maxillary implant retained fixed prostheses with removable implant overdentures opposed by mandibular implant-supported overdentures. Sixteen patients, who had previously received mandibular implants, entered the study and received four to six maxillary implants. After dropouts as a consequence of a lack of osseointegration and general health problems, 13 remained. Of these, five received the removable prosthesis first and eight the fixed prosthesis. After 2 months, the prostheses were exchanged and the second was also worn for 2 months. Psychometric measurements of general satisfaction with the prostheses as well as comfort, ability to speak, stability, esthetics, ease of cleaning and occlusion were obtained once each prosthesis had been worn for 2 months. Chewing ability was assessed for seven types of food. Removable long-bar overdentures received significantly higher ratings of general satisfaction than fixed prostheses (P = 0.003). Patients also rated their ability to speak and ease of cleaning significantly better with the removable overdentures. Nine patients chose to keep the removable prosthesis and four preferred to keep the fixed prosthesis. The results suggest that maxillary removable overdentures on multiple implants may provide patients with better function than fixed prostheses.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">12562375</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2003</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>10</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>14</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2003</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>125-30</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Dental implants provide patients with restorative options for the edentulous maxilla. Both fixed and removable prostheses can be attached to the edentulous maxilla, but the efficacy of different designs has not been determined. In this two-session within-subject crossover trial we compared maxillary implant retained fixed prostheses with removable implant overdentures opposed by mandibular implant-supported overdentures. Sixteen patients, who had previously received mandibular implants, entered the study and received four to six maxillary implants. After dropouts as a consequence of a lack of osseointegration and general health problems, 13 remained. Of these, five received the removable prosthesis first and eight the fixed prosthesis. After 2 months, the prostheses were exchanged and the second was also worn for 2 months. Psychometric measurements of general satisfaction with the prostheses as well as comfort, ability to speak, stability, esthetics, ease of cleaning and occlusion were obtained once each prosthesis had been worn for 2 months. Chewing ability was assessed for seven types of food. Removable long-bar overdentures received significantly higher ratings of general satisfaction than fixed prostheses (P = 0.003). Patients also rated their ability to speak and ease of cleaning significantly better with the removable overdentures. Nine patients chose to keep the removable prosthesis and four preferred to keep the fixed prosthesis. The results suggest that maxillary removable overdentures on multiple implants may provide patients with better function than fixed prostheses.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Heydecke</LastName><ForeName>Guido</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Boudrias</LastName><ForeName>Pierre</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Awad</LastName><ForeName>Manal A</ForeName><Initials>MA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>De Albuquerque</LastName><ForeName>Rubens F</ForeName><Initials>RF</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lund</LastName><ForeName>James P</ForeName><Initials>JP</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Feine</LastName><ForeName>Jocelyne S</ForeName><Initials>JS</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001294" MajorTopicYN="N">Attitude to Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018592" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Over Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003766" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Occlusion</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003779" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003824" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Complete</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004955" MajorTopicYN="N">Esthetics, Dental</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008409" MajorTopicYN="N">Mastication</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016555" MajorTopicYN="N">Matched-Pair Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009910" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Hygiene</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011594" MajorTopicYN="N">Psychometrics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013060" MajorTopicYN="N">Speech</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2003</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>4</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2003</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2003</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>4</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12562375</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">clr140117</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002F86 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002F86 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:12562375
|texte= Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12562375" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |