A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla.
Identifieur interne : 002A58 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 002A57; suivant : 002A59A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla.
Auteurs : Mats Hallman [Suède] ; Arne Mordenfeld ; Tomas StrandkvistSource :
- Clinical implant dentistry and related research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2005.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Colle de fibrine, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Humains, Implants dentaires, Maxillaire (), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Ostéotomie de Le Fort, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Procédures de chirurgie préprothétique en odontologie (), Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résorption alvéolaire (), Résorption alvéolaire (rééducation et réadaptation), Sinus maxillaire (), Sujet âgé, Transplantation osseuse (), Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée, Résorption alvéolaire.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Colle de fibrine, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Humains, Implants dentaires, Maxillaire, Ostéotomie de Le Fort, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Procédures de chirurgie préprothétique en odontologie, Propriétés de surface, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Résorption alvéolaire, Sinus maxillaire, Sujet âgé, Transplantation osseuse, Échec de restauration dentaire, Études de suivi, Études rétrospectives.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Alveolar Bone Loss (rehabilitation), Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery), Bone Transplantation (methods), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Fibrin Tissue Adhesive, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Maxilla (surgery), Maxillary Sinus (surgery), Middle Aged, Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (methods), Osteotomy, Le Fort, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants, Fibrin Tissue Adhesive.
- methods : Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic.
- rehabilitation : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Alveolar Bone Loss, Maxilla, Maxillary Sinus.
- Adult, Aged, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteotomy, Le Fort, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties.
Abstract
Long-term comparative follow-up studies of dental implants placed in augmented bone are rare. Variations in design and surface roughness have been found to be important for bone integration of implants. However, there is no clinical evidence that such variations lead to an improved clinical outcome.
PubMed: 16219241
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002A58
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16219241Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla.</title><author><name sortKey="Hallman, Mats" sort="Hallman, Mats" uniqKey="Hallman M" first="Mats" last="Hallman">Mats Hallman</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden. mats.hallman@lg.se</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mordenfeld, Arne" sort="Mordenfeld, Arne" uniqKey="Mordenfeld A" first="Arne" last="Mordenfeld">Arne Mordenfeld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Strandkvist, Tomas" sort="Strandkvist, Tomas" uniqKey="Strandkvist T" first="Tomas" last="Strandkvist">Tomas Strandkvist</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16219241</idno><idno type="pmid">16219241</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002A58</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002A58</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002A58</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002A58</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla.</title><author><name sortKey="Hallman, Mats" sort="Hallman, Mats" uniqKey="Hallman M" first="Mats" last="Hallman">Mats Hallman</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden. mats.hallman@lg.se</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mordenfeld, Arne" sort="Mordenfeld, Arne" uniqKey="Mordenfeld A" first="Arne" last="Mordenfeld">Arne Mordenfeld</name></author><author><name sortKey="Strandkvist, Tomas" sort="Strandkvist, Tomas" uniqKey="Strandkvist T" first="Tomas" last="Strandkvist">Tomas Strandkvist</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (rehabilitation)</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery)</term><term>Bone Transplantation (methods)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Maxillary Sinus (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (methods)</term><term>Osteotomy, Le Fort</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Colle de fibrine</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Maxillaire ()</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Ostéotomie de Le Fort</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Procédures de chirurgie préprothétique en odontologie ()</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire ()</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Sinus maxillaire ()</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Transplantation osseuse ()</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Fibrin Tissue Adhesive</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary Sinus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osteotomy, Le Fort</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Colle de fibrine</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Maxillaire</term><term>Ostéotomie de Le Fort</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Procédures de chirurgie préprothétique en odontologie</term><term>Propriétés de surface</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Résorption alvéolaire</term><term>Sinus maxillaire</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Transplantation osseuse</term><term>Échec de restauration dentaire</term><term>Études de suivi</term><term>Études rétrospectives</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Long-term comparative follow-up studies of dental implants placed in augmented bone are rare. Variations in design and surface roughness have been found to be important for bone integration of implants. However, there is no clinical evidence that such variations lead to an improved clinical outcome.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16219241</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2005</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2014</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>29</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1523-0899</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>7</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>121-6</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Long-term comparative follow-up studies of dental implants placed in augmented bone are rare. Variations in design and surface roughness have been found to be important for bone integration of implants. However, there is no clinical evidence that such variations lead to an improved clinical outcome.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare two different implant systems used after interpositional bone grafting of the severely resorbed maxilla with a modified augmentation technique using fibrin glue.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Twenty-two consecutive patients presenting with severe maxillary atrophy underwent reconstruction with Le Fort I osteotomies and interpositional bone grafting. Before placement of bone blocks, the floors of the maxillary sinuses were packed with bone chips mixed with a fibrin glue, to stabilize the graft. After 6 months of graft healing, the first 11 consecutive patients received Brånemark System implants with a turned surface (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden). The following 11 consecutive patients were treated with Astra Tech implants with a blasted titanium surface (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden). All patients received fixed prostheses. Marginal bone resorption and donor and recipient site morbidity were evaluated. All patients were clinically and radiographically observed throughout 5 years of functional loading.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">In the Brånemark group, 11 (13%) of 84 placed implants were lost, compared to 4 (5.5%) of 72 placed implants in the Astra Tech group. The difference was not significant. All patients retained fixed constructions after 5 years of loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 2.3+/-0.8 mm (range, 0-5.0 mm) in the Brånemark group and 2.4+/-1.4 mm (range, 0-7.0 mm) in the Astra Tech group although again no statistical difference was found. A larger number of implants in the Astra Tech group had a marginal bone resorption of>or=3 mm, and implant success in that group was lower than in the Brånemark group (52% vs 70%).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">In this study, reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with Le Fort I osteotomy, interpositional bone grafting, and delayed placement of dental implants was found to be a predictable long-term procedure. Although more implants with a turned surface were lost during the follow-up period, there were no statistically significant differences between turned and titanium blasted implants.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Hallman</LastName><ForeName>Mats</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gävle City, Sweden. mats.hallman@lg.se</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mordenfeld</LastName><ForeName>Arne</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Strandkvist</LastName><ForeName>Tomas</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D023362">Evaluation Studies</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100888977</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1523-0899</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015718">Fibrin Tissue Adhesive</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015718" MajorTopicYN="N">Fibrin Tissue Adhesive</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008443" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxillary Sinus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013516" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019340" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteotomy, Le Fort</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2005</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16219241</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002A58 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002A58 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16219241
|texte= A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16219241" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |