Comparison of clinical, radiographic and immunological parameters of teeth and different dental implant platforms.
Identifieur interne : 002612 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 002611; suivant : 002613Comparison of clinical, radiographic and immunological parameters of teeth and different dental implant platforms.
Auteurs : Eli E. Machtei [Israël] ; Efrat Oved-Peleg ; Micha PeledSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2006.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Dinoprostone (analyse), Exsudat gingival (immunologie), Facteur de nécrose tumorale alpha (analyse), Humains, Implants dentaires (effets indésirables), Interleukine-1 (analyse), Maladies du maxillaire supérieur (imagerie diagnostique), Maladies mandibulaires (imagerie diagnostique), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Méthodes épidémiologiques, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Radiographie, Résorption alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique), Sujet âgé.
- MESH :
- analyse : Dinoprostone, Facteur de nécrose tumorale alpha, Interleukine-1.
- effets indésirables : Implants dentaires.
- imagerie diagnostique : Maladies du maxillaire supérieur, Maladies mandibulaires, Résorption alvéolaire.
- immunologie : Exsudat gingival.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- Adulte d'âge moyen, Humains, Méthodes épidémiologiques, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Radiographie, Sujet âgé.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants (adverse effects), Dinoprostone (analysis), Epidemiologic Methods, Gingival Crevicular Fluid (immunology), Humans, Interleukin-1 (analysis), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Mandibular Diseases (diagnostic imaging), Maxillary Diseases (diagnostic imaging), Middle Aged, Radiography, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (analysis).
- MESH :
- chemical , adverse effects : Dental Implants.
- chemical , analysis : Dinoprostone, Interleukin-1, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha.
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Bone Loss, Mandibular Diseases, Maxillary Diseases.
- immunology : Gingival Crevicular Fluid.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Aged, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Middle Aged, Radiography.
Abstract
A comparison between host response in teeth and dental implants was not made. Likewise, the association between host response and periodontal parameters has never been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare periodontal health around natural teeth and dental implants with different restorative platforms. Twenty-seven partially edentulous patients with dental implants, either external hex butt joint (n=28) or tapered Morse (n=45), were included in this study. Implants were in function for 1-6 years (mean 2.9). Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD); and clinical attachment level (CAL), were recorded at final examination; alveolar bone loss (ABL) was measured at baseline and final examination using panoramic radiographs. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were obtained from the Ramfjord index teeth and all implants and assayed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha). Differences between teeth and implants and between the two implant platforms were compared using Student's t-test. Correlations between cytokines, ABL and clinical parameters were analyzed using Pearson's co-efficient test. PI and GI were significantly higher in teeth than dental implants (1.2+/-0.5 vs. 0.8+/-0.5, P=0.0018; 1.2+/-0.3 vs. 1.1+/-0.3, P=0.048). Conversely, PD was deeper in implants (2.66+/-0.6 vs. 3.66+/-0.9, P=0.001). GI and PD around teeth and implants were positively associated (R=0.561, P=0.0023; R=0.39, P=0.0452). Greater ABL was observed around dental implants (1.62+/-2.2 mm) compared with teeth (0.49+/-0.3 mm). A positive correlation was found between both IL-1 (R=0.73, P=0.0064; R=0.52, P=0.0081) and TNFalpha (R=0.64, P=0.0246; R=0.46, P=0.091) and ABL in teeth and implants. Both implant platforms were similar clinically and radiographically; however, TNFalpha (2.49+/-0.3 vs. 4.79+/-0.5, P=0.004) and IL-1 (24.52+/-7.3 vs. 45.41+/-9.9, P=0.095) were higher for the non-submerged implants. In conclusion, IL-1 and TNFalpha are sensitive markers of ABL around teeth and implants. The two dental implant platforms showed a similar clinical and radiographic response; however, the greater host response in the non-submerged implants might suggest future bone loss.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01282.x
PubMed: 17092224
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002612
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17092224Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of clinical, radiographic and immunological parameters of teeth and different dental implant platforms.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Machtei, Eli E" sort="Machtei, Eli E" uniqKey="Machtei E" first="Eli E" last="Machtei">Eli E. Machtei</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Unit of Periodontology, Technion-Israeli Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. machtei@rambam.health.gov.il</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Israël</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Unit of Periodontology, Technion-Israeli Institute of Technology, Haifa</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Oved Peleg, Efrat" sort="Oved Peleg, Efrat" uniqKey="Oved Peleg E" first="Efrat" last="Oved-Peleg">Efrat Oved-Peleg</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Peled, Micha" sort="Peled, Micha" uniqKey="Peled M" first="Micha" last="Peled">Micha Peled</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17092224</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17092224</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01282.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002612</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002612</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002612</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002612</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of clinical, radiographic and immunological parameters of teeth and different dental implant platforms.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Machtei, Eli E" sort="Machtei, Eli E" uniqKey="Machtei E" first="Eli E" last="Machtei">Eli E. Machtei</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Unit of Periodontology, Technion-Israeli Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. machtei@rambam.health.gov.il</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Israël</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Unit of Periodontology, Technion-Israeli Institute of Technology, Haifa</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Oved Peleg, Efrat" sort="Oved Peleg, Efrat" uniqKey="Oved Peleg E" first="Efrat" last="Oved-Peleg">Efrat Oved-Peleg</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Peled, Micha" sort="Peled, Micha" uniqKey="Peled M" first="Micha" last="Peled">Micha Peled</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<imprint><date when="2006" type="published">2006</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Alveolar Bone Loss (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term>
<term>Dental Implants (adverse effects)</term>
<term>Dinoprostone (analysis)</term>
<term>Epidemiologic Methods</term>
<term>Gingival Crevicular Fluid (immunology)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Interleukin-1 (analysis)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Mandibular Diseases (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Maxillary Diseases (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (analysis)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Dinoprostone (analyse)</term>
<term>Exsudat gingival (immunologie)</term>
<term>Facteur de nécrose tumorale alpha (analyse)</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires (effets indésirables)</term>
<term>Interleukine-1 (analyse)</term>
<term>Maladies du maxillaire supérieur (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Maladies mandibulaires (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Méthodes épidémiologiques</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term>
<term>Radiographie</term>
<term>Résorption alvéolaire (imagerie diagnostique)</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>Dinoprostone</term>
<term>Interleukin-1</term>
<term>Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="analyse" xml:lang="fr"><term>Dinoprostone</term>
<term>Facteur de nécrose tumorale alpha</term>
<term>Interleukine-1</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term>
<term>Mandibular Diseases</term>
<term>Maxillary Diseases</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="effets indésirables" xml:lang="fr"><term>Implants dentaires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Maladies du maxillaire supérieur</term>
<term>Maladies mandibulaires</term>
<term>Résorption alvéolaire</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="immunologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Exsudat gingival</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="immunology" xml:lang="en"><term>Gingival Crevicular Fluid</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Epidemiologic Methods</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Méthodes épidémiologiques</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Radiographie</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A comparison between host response in teeth and dental implants was not made. Likewise, the association between host response and periodontal parameters has never been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare periodontal health around natural teeth and dental implants with different restorative platforms. Twenty-seven partially edentulous patients with dental implants, either external hex butt joint (n=28) or tapered Morse (n=45), were included in this study. Implants were in function for 1-6 years (mean 2.9). Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD); and clinical attachment level (CAL), were recorded at final examination; alveolar bone loss (ABL) was measured at baseline and final examination using panoramic radiographs. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were obtained from the Ramfjord index teeth and all implants and assayed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha). Differences between teeth and implants and between the two implant platforms were compared using Student's t-test. Correlations between cytokines, ABL and clinical parameters were analyzed using Pearson's co-efficient test. PI and GI were significantly higher in teeth than dental implants (1.2+/-0.5 vs. 0.8+/-0.5, P=0.0018; 1.2+/-0.3 vs. 1.1+/-0.3, P=0.048). Conversely, PD was deeper in implants (2.66+/-0.6 vs. 3.66+/-0.9, P=0.001). GI and PD around teeth and implants were positively associated (R=0.561, P=0.0023; R=0.39, P=0.0452). Greater ABL was observed around dental implants (1.62+/-2.2 mm) compared with teeth (0.49+/-0.3 mm). A positive correlation was found between both IL-1 (R=0.73, P=0.0064; R=0.52, P=0.0081) and TNFalpha (R=0.64, P=0.0246; R=0.46, P=0.091) and ABL in teeth and implants. Both implant platforms were similar clinically and radiographically; however, TNFalpha (2.49+/-0.3 vs. 4.79+/-0.5, P=0.004) and IL-1 (24.52+/-7.3 vs. 45.41+/-9.9, P=0.095) were higher for the non-submerged implants. In conclusion, IL-1 and TNFalpha are sensitive markers of ABL around teeth and implants. The two dental implant platforms showed a similar clinical and radiographic response; however, the greater host response in the non-submerged implants might suggest future bone loss.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17092224</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2016</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>17</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2006</Year>
<Month>Dec</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of clinical, radiographic and immunological parameters of teeth and different dental implant platforms.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>658-65</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>A comparison between host response in teeth and dental implants was not made. Likewise, the association between host response and periodontal parameters has never been explored. The purpose of this study was to compare periodontal health around natural teeth and dental implants with different restorative platforms. Twenty-seven partially edentulous patients with dental implants, either external hex butt joint (n=28) or tapered Morse (n=45), were included in this study. Implants were in function for 1-6 years (mean 2.9). Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD); and clinical attachment level (CAL), were recorded at final examination; alveolar bone loss (ABL) was measured at baseline and final examination using panoramic radiographs. Gingival crevicular fluid samples were obtained from the Ramfjord index teeth and all implants and assayed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha). Differences between teeth and implants and between the two implant platforms were compared using Student's t-test. Correlations between cytokines, ABL and clinical parameters were analyzed using Pearson's co-efficient test. PI and GI were significantly higher in teeth than dental implants (1.2+/-0.5 vs. 0.8+/-0.5, P=0.0018; 1.2+/-0.3 vs. 1.1+/-0.3, P=0.048). Conversely, PD was deeper in implants (2.66+/-0.6 vs. 3.66+/-0.9, P=0.001). GI and PD around teeth and implants were positively associated (R=0.561, P=0.0023; R=0.39, P=0.0452). Greater ABL was observed around dental implants (1.62+/-2.2 mm) compared with teeth (0.49+/-0.3 mm). A positive correlation was found between both IL-1 (R=0.73, P=0.0064; R=0.52, P=0.0081) and TNFalpha (R=0.64, P=0.0246; R=0.46, P=0.091) and ABL in teeth and implants. Both implant platforms were similar clinically and radiographically; however, TNFalpha (2.49+/-0.3 vs. 4.79+/-0.5, P=0.004) and IL-1 (24.52+/-7.3 vs. 45.41+/-9.9, P=0.095) were higher for the non-submerged implants. In conclusion, IL-1 and TNFalpha are sensitive markers of ABL around teeth and implants. The two dental implant platforms showed a similar clinical and radiographic response; however, the greater host response in the non-submerged implants might suggest future bone loss.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Machtei</LastName>
<ForeName>Eli E</ForeName>
<Initials>EE</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Unit of Periodontology, Technion-Israeli Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. machtei@rambam.health.gov.il</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Oved-Peleg</LastName>
<ForeName>Efrat</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Peled</LastName>
<ForeName>Micha</ForeName>
<Initials>M</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country>
<MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D007375">Interleukin-1</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D014409">Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
<Chemical><RegistryNumber>K7Q1JQR04M</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015232">Dinoprostone</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dinoprostone</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004812" MajorTopicYN="N">Epidemiologic Methods</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005883" MajorTopicYN="N">Gingival Crevicular Fluid</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000276" MajorTopicYN="N">immunology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007375" MajorTopicYN="N">Interleukin-1</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008336" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandibular Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008439" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxillary Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014409" MajorTopicYN="N">Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17092224</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">CLR1282</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01282.x</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002612 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002612 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:17092224 |texte= Comparison of clinical, radiographic and immunological parameters of teeth and different dental implant platforms. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17092224" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |