An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Identifieur interne : 002543 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 002542; suivant : 002544An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Auteurs : G T Stoker [Pays-Bas] ; D. Wismeijer ; M A J. Van WaasSource :
- Journal of dental research [ 0022-0345 ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse coût-bénéfice, Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (économie), Femelle, Humains, Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Mâle, Overdenture (économie), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (économie), Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure (économie), Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (économie), Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (instrumentation), Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (économie), Satisfaction du patient, Soins postopératoires (économie), Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Études de suivi.
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- économie : Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Overdenture, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Soins postopératoires.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Analyse coût-bénéfice, Femelle, Humains, Mâle, Satisfaction du patient, Sujet âgé, Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus, Études de suivi.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (economics), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (economics), Denture Design (economics), Denture Retention (economics), Denture Retention (instrumentation), Denture, Complete, Lower (economics), Denture, Overlay (economics), Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Postoperative Care (economics).
- MESH :
- economics : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Design, Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Postoperative Care.
- instrumentation : Denture Retention.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction.
Abstract
Mandibular implant overdentures increase satisfaction and the quality of life of edentulous individuals. Long-term aftercare and costs may depend on the type of overdentures. One hundred and ten individuals received one of 3 types of implant-retained overdentures, randomly assigned, and were evaluated with respect to aftercare and costs. The follow-up time was 8 years, with only seven drop-outs. No significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test) were observed for direct costs of aftercare (p = 0.94). The initial costs constituted 75% of the total costs and were significantly higher in the group with a bar on 4 implants, compared with the group with a bar on 2 implants and the group with ball attachments on 2 implants (p = 0.018). The last group needed a significantly higher number of prosthodontist-patient aftercare contacts, mostly for re-adjustment of the retentive system. It can be concluded that an overdenture with a bar on 2 implants might be the most efficient in the long term.
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600315
PubMed: 17314262
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002543
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17314262Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Stoker, G T" sort="Stoker, G T" uniqKey="Stoker G" first="G T" last="Stoker">G T Stoker</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Free University, Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Dental School, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Free University, Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Dental School, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D" last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Waas, M A J" sort="Van Waas, M A J" uniqKey="Van Waas M" first="M A J" last="Van Waas">M A J. Van Waas</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17314262</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17314262</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1177/154405910708600315</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002543</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002543</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">002543</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">002543</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Stoker, G T" sort="Stoker, G T" uniqKey="Stoker G" first="G T" last="Stoker">G T Stoker</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Free University, Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Dental School, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Free University, Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Dental School, Amsterdam</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wismeijer, D" sort="Wismeijer, D" uniqKey="Wismeijer D" first="D" last="Wismeijer">D. Wismeijer</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Van Waas, M A J" sort="Van Waas, M A J" uniqKey="Van Waas M" first="M A J" last="Van Waas">M A J. Van Waas</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of dental research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-0345</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (economics)</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (economics)</term>
<term>Denture Design (economics)</term>
<term>Denture Retention (economics)</term>
<term>Denture Retention (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower (economics)</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay (economics)</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Postoperative Care (economics)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse coût-bénéfice</term>
<term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (économie)</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Overdenture (économie)</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (économie)</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure (économie)</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée (économie)</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (économie)</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Soins postopératoires (économie)</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture Design</term>
<term>Denture Retention</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Postoperative Care</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="économie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Overdenture</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire complète inférieure</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term>
<term>Soins postopératoires</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Aged, 80 and over</term>
<term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term>
<term>Analyse coût-bénéfice</term>
<term>Femelle</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Mâle</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Sujet âgé</term>
<term>Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus</term>
<term>Études de suivi</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Mandibular implant overdentures increase satisfaction and the quality of life of edentulous individuals. Long-term aftercare and costs may depend on the type of overdentures. One hundred and ten individuals received one of 3 types of implant-retained overdentures, randomly assigned, and were evaluated with respect to aftercare and costs. The follow-up time was 8 years, with only seven drop-outs. No significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test) were observed for direct costs of aftercare (p = 0.94). The initial costs constituted 75% of the total costs and were significantly higher in the group with a bar on 4 implants, compared with the group with a bar on 2 implants and the group with ball attachments on 2 implants (p = 0.018). The last group needed a significantly higher number of prosthodontist-patient aftercare contacts, mostly for re-adjustment of the retentive system. It can be concluded that an overdenture with a bar on 2 implants might be the most efficient in the long term.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17314262</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>27</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-0345</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>86</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>Mar</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of dental research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J. Dent. Res.</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>276-80</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Mandibular implant overdentures increase satisfaction and the quality of life of edentulous individuals. Long-term aftercare and costs may depend on the type of overdentures. One hundred and ten individuals received one of 3 types of implant-retained overdentures, randomly assigned, and were evaluated with respect to aftercare and costs. The follow-up time was 8 years, with only seven drop-outs. No significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test) were observed for direct costs of aftercare (p = 0.94). The initial costs constituted 75% of the total costs and were significantly higher in the group with a bar on 4 implants, compared with the group with a bar on 2 implants and the group with ball attachments on 2 implants (p = 0.018). The last group needed a significantly higher number of prosthodontist-patient aftercare contacts, mostly for re-adjustment of the retentive system. It can be concluded that an overdenture with a bar on 2 implants might be the most efficient in the long term.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stoker</LastName>
<ForeName>G T</ForeName>
<Initials>GT</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Free University, Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Dental School, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wismeijer</LastName>
<ForeName>D</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Waas</LastName>
<ForeName>M A J</ForeName>
<Initials>MA</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Dent Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0354343</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0022-0345</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008 Jun;8(2):76-7</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">18492576</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>J Dent Res. 2007 Oct;86(10):919; author reply 919-20</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17890665</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
<CommentsCorrections RefType="CommentIn"><RefSource>J Dent Res. 2007 Oct;86(10):920; author reply 920-1</RefSource>
<PMID Version="1">17890666</PMID>
</CommentsCorrections>
</CommentsCorrectionsList>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003779" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Design</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003826" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Complete, Lower</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011182" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Care</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>3</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17314262</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">86/3/276</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1177/154405910708600315</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002543 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002543 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:17314262 |texte= An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of aftercare and cost-analysis with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17314262" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |