Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Identifieur interne : 001B01 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 001B00; suivant : 001B02Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Auteurs : Volkan Arisan [Turquie] ; Z Cuneyt Karabuda ; Tayfun OzdemirSource :
- Journal of periodontology [ 1943-3670 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur (), Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur (instrumentation), Conception assistée par ordinateur (instrumentation), Conception de prothèse dentaire, Femelle, Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle, Implants dentaires, Modèles dentaires, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (), Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique), Mâle, Ostéotomie (), Ostéotomie (instrumentation), Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation), Reproductibilité des résultats, Statistique non paramétrique, Sujet âgé, Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique.
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur, Conception assistée par ordinateur, Conception de prothèse dentaire, Femelle, Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle, Implants dentaires, Modèles dentaires, Mâchoire partiellement édentée, Mâle, Ostéotomie, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Reproductibilité des résultats, Statistique non paramétrique, Sujet âgé, Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Computer-Aided Design (instrumentation), Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Models, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Middle Aged, Osteotomy (instrumentation), Osteotomy (methods), Patient Care Planning, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surgery, Computer-Assisted (instrumentation), Surgery, Computer-Assisted (methods).
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- instrumentation : Computer-Aided Design, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Osteotomy, Surgery, Computer-Assisted.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Osteotomy, Surgery, Computer-Assisted.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Adult, Aged, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Dental Models, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Planning, Reproducibility of Results, Statistics, Nonparametric.
Abstract
Stereolithographic surgical guides provide significant benefits during the simultaneous placement of multiple implants with regard to the final prosthetic plan. However, deviation from the planning poses a significant risk. Deviations of implants that were placed by bone-, tooth-, and mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides were examined in this study.
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090348
PubMed: 20059416
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001B01
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20059416Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Arisan, Volkan" sort="Arisan, Volkan" uniqKey="Arisan V" first="Volkan" last="Arisan">Volkan Arisan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34390 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey. varisan@istanbul.edu.tr</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34390 Capa, Istanbul</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Karabuda, Z Cuneyt" sort="Karabuda, Z Cuneyt" uniqKey="Karabuda Z" first="Z Cuneyt" last="Karabuda">Z Cuneyt Karabuda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozdemir, Tayfun" sort="Ozdemir, Tayfun" uniqKey="Ozdemir T" first="Tayfun" last="Ozdemir">Tayfun Ozdemir</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20059416</idno><idno type="pmid">20059416</idno><idno type="doi">10.1902/jop.2009.090348</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001B01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001B01</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001B01</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001B01</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Arisan, Volkan" sort="Arisan, Volkan" uniqKey="Arisan V" first="Volkan" last="Arisan">Volkan Arisan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34390 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey. varisan@istanbul.edu.tr</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34390 Capa, Istanbul</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Karabuda, Z Cuneyt" sort="Karabuda, Z Cuneyt" uniqKey="Karabuda Z" first="Z Cuneyt" last="Karabuda">Z Cuneyt Karabuda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ozdemir, Tayfun" sort="Ozdemir, Tayfun" uniqKey="Ozdemir T" first="Tayfun" last="Ozdemir">Tayfun Ozdemir</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of periodontology</title><idno type="eISSN">1943-3670</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Computer-Aided Design (instrumentation)</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osteotomy (instrumentation)</term><term>Osteotomy (methods)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted (instrumentation)</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur ()</term><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur (instrumentation)</term><term>Conception assistée par ordinateur (instrumentation)</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée ()</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéotomie ()</term><term>Ostéotomie (instrumentation)</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation)</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Osteotomy</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Osteotomy</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Conception assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Conception de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Ostéotomie</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Statistique non paramétrique</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Tomodensitométrie à faisceau conique</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Stereolithographic surgical guides provide significant benefits during the simultaneous placement of multiple implants with regard to the final prosthetic plan. However, deviation from the planning poses a significant risk. Deviations of implants that were placed by bone-, tooth-, and mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides were examined in this study.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20059416</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>14</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1943-3670</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>81</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Month>Jan</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of periodontology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Periodontol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>43-51</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1902/jop.2009.090348</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Stereolithographic surgical guides provide significant benefits during the simultaneous placement of multiple implants with regard to the final prosthetic plan. However, deviation from the planning poses a significant risk. Deviations of implants that were placed by bone-, tooth-, and mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides were examined in this study.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">After enrolling 54 eligible patients, 294 implants were planned on cone-beam computerized tomography CB(CT)-derived images. Sixty guides, both single- and multiple-type, were produced using two commercial systems. Mucosa-supported guides were fixed with osteosynthesis screws. Implants were inserted, and at the end of osseointegration period, a new CB(CT) scan was performed. Preoperative planning was merged with the new CB(CT) data to identify the deviations between the planned and placed implants for each support type and manufacturer. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparison (P <0.05).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">There were no damage-related complications in any critical anatomy. Implants that were placed by bone-supported guides had the highest mean deviations (5.0 degrees +/- 1.66 degrees angular, and 1.70 +/- 0.52 mm and 1.99 +/- 0.64 mm for implant shoulder and tip, respectively), whereas the lowest deviations were measured in implants that were placed by mucosa-supported guides (2.9 degrees +/- 0.39 degrees angular, and 0.7 +/- 0.13 mm and 0.76 +/- 0.15 mm for implant shoulder and tip, respectively).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Computer-aided planning and manufacturing surgical guides in accordance with CB(CT) images may help clinicians place implants. Rigid screw fixation of a single guide incorporating metal sleeves and a special drill kit further minimizes deviations.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Arisan</LastName><ForeName>Volkan</ForeName><Initials>V</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34390 Capa, Istanbul, Turkey. varisan@istanbul.edu.tr</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Karabuda</LastName><ForeName>Z Cuneyt</ForeName><Initials>ZC</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ozdemir</LastName><ForeName>Tayfun</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Periodontol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8000345</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-3492</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017076" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer-Aided Design</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D054893" MajorTopicYN="N">Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003765" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021621" MajorTopicYN="N">Imaging, Three-Dimensional</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010027" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteotomy</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025321" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20059416</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1902/jop.2009.090348</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B01 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001B01 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20059416
|texte= Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20059416" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |