Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.
Identifieur interne : 001459 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 001458; suivant : 001460Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.
Auteurs : German O. Gallucci [États-Unis] ; Panos Papaspyridakos ; Linah M. Ashy ; Go Eun Kim ; Nicholas J. Brady ; Hans-Peter WeberSource :
- The International journal of prosthodontics [ 0893-2174 ]
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adulte, Humains, Implants dentaires, Microtomographie aux rayons X, Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (), Projets pilotes, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse partielle fixe, Satisfaction du patient, Statistique non paramétrique, Technique de prise d'empreinte (instrumentation).
- MESH :
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire partiellement édentée.
- Adulte, Humains, Implants dentaires, Microtomographie aux rayons X, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Projets pilotes, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Prothèse partielle fixe, Satisfaction du patient, Statistique non paramétrique, Technique de prise d'empreinte.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Impression Technique (instrumentation), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Patient Satisfaction, Pilot Projects, Statistics, Nonparametric, X-Ray Microtomography.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- instrumentation : Dental Impression Technique.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- Adult, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Humans, Patient Satisfaction, Pilot Projects, Statistics, Nonparametric, X-Ray Microtomography.
Abstract
The aim of this research was to compare the accuracy outcomes of open- and closed-tray implant impressions for partially edentulous patients. Eleven partially edentulous spaces in seven patients with two existing implants for fixed partial dentures were included. Group I (closed-tray) and group II (open-tray) were compared using microcomputed tomography scanning. No statistically significant differences were found between the closed- and open-tray techniques (P = .317). The subjective evaluation of patient comfort showed no differences with either impression technique. There were no differences seen between open- and closed-tray impression techniques in partially edentulous patients when implants had less than 10 degrees of angulation.
PubMed: 21909490
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001459
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21909490Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gallucci, German O" sort="Gallucci, German O" uniqKey="Gallucci G" first="German O" last="Gallucci">German O. Gallucci</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. german_gallucci@hsdm.harvard.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Papaspyridakos, Panos" sort="Papaspyridakos, Panos" uniqKey="Papaspyridakos P" first="Panos" last="Papaspyridakos">Panos Papaspyridakos</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ashy, Linah M" sort="Ashy, Linah M" uniqKey="Ashy L" first="Linah M" last="Ashy">Linah M. Ashy</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kim, Go Eun" sort="Kim, Go Eun" uniqKey="Kim G" first="Go Eun" last="Kim">Go Eun Kim</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Brady, Nicholas J" sort="Brady, Nicholas J" uniqKey="Brady N" first="Nicholas J" last="Brady">Nicholas J. Brady</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Weber, Hans Peter" sort="Weber, Hans Peter" uniqKey="Weber H" first="Hans-Peter" last="Weber">Hans-Peter Weber</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2011 Sep-Oct</MedlineDate>
</PubDate>
</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:21909490</idno>
<idno type="pmid">21909490</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001459</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001459</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001459</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001459</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Gallucci, German O" sort="Gallucci, German O" uniqKey="Gallucci G" first="German O" last="Gallucci">German O. Gallucci</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. german_gallucci@hsdm.harvard.edu</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Papaspyridakos, Panos" sort="Papaspyridakos, Panos" uniqKey="Papaspyridakos P" first="Panos" last="Papaspyridakos">Panos Papaspyridakos</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ashy, Linah M" sort="Ashy, Linah M" uniqKey="Ashy L" first="Linah M" last="Ashy">Linah M. Ashy</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kim, Go Eun" sort="Kim, Go Eun" uniqKey="Kim G" first="Go Eun" last="Kim">Go Eun Kim</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Brady, Nicholas J" sort="Brady, Nicholas J" uniqKey="Brady N" first="Nicholas J" last="Brady">Nicholas J. Brady</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Weber, Hans Peter" sort="Weber, Hans Peter" uniqKey="Weber H" first="Hans-Peter" last="Weber">Hans-Peter Weber</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">The International journal of prosthodontics</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0893-2174</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dental Impression Technique (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Pilot Projects</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>X-Ray Microtomography</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Microtomographie aux rayons X</term>
<term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux ()</term>
<term>Projets pilotes</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Technique de prise d'empreinte (instrumentation)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire partiellement édentée</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Pilot Projects</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>X-Ray Microtomography</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adulte</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Implants dentaires</term>
<term>Microtomographie aux rayons X</term>
<term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term>
<term>Projets pilotes</term>
<term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term>
<term>Prothèse partielle fixe</term>
<term>Satisfaction du patient</term>
<term>Statistique non paramétrique</term>
<term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this research was to compare the accuracy outcomes of open- and closed-tray implant impressions for partially edentulous patients. Eleven partially edentulous spaces in seven patients with two existing implants for fixed partial dentures were included. Group I (closed-tray) and group II (open-tray) were compared using microcomputed tomography scanning. No statistically significant differences were found between the closed- and open-tray techniques (P = .317). The subjective evaluation of patient comfort showed no differences with either impression technique. There were no differences seen between open- and closed-tray impression techniques in partially edentulous patients when implants had less than 10 degrees of angulation.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21909490</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>12</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0893-2174</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>24</Volume>
<Issue>5</Issue>
<PubDate><MedlineDate>2011 Sep-Oct</MedlineDate>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>The International journal of prosthodontics</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Int J Prosthodont</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>469-72</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of this research was to compare the accuracy outcomes of open- and closed-tray implant impressions for partially edentulous patients. Eleven partially edentulous spaces in seven patients with two existing implants for fixed partial dentures were included. Group I (closed-tray) and group II (open-tray) were compared using microcomputed tomography scanning. No statistically significant differences were found between the closed- and open-tray techniques (P = .317). The subjective evaluation of patient comfort showed no differences with either impression technique. There were no differences seen between open- and closed-tray impression techniques in partially edentulous patients when implants had less than 10 degrees of angulation.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gallucci</LastName>
<ForeName>German O</ForeName>
<Initials>GO</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. german_gallucci@hsdm.harvard.edu</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Papaspyridakos</LastName>
<ForeName>Panos</ForeName>
<Initials>P</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ashy</LastName>
<ForeName>Linah M</ForeName>
<Initials>LM</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kim</LastName>
<ForeName>Go Eun</ForeName>
<Initials>GE</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brady</LastName>
<ForeName>Nicholas J</ForeName>
<Initials>NJ</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Weber</LastName>
<ForeName>Hans-Peter</ForeName>
<Initials>HP</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D018848">Controlled Clinical Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>Int J Prosthodont</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8900938</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0893-2174</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003830" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Fixed</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="Y">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055114" MajorTopicYN="N">X-Ray Microtomography</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21909490</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001459 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001459 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:21909490 |texte= Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21909490" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |