Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
Identifieur interne : 001389 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 001388; suivant : 001390Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
Auteurs : Panos Papaspyridakos [États-Unis] ; Kunal Lal ; George Shelby White ; Hans-Peter Weber ; German O. GallucciSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 1942-4434 ]
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Arcade dentaire (anatomie et histologie), Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire (), Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier (), Humains, Implants dentaires, Matériaux empreinte dentaire, Modèles dentaires (normes), Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Piliers dentaires, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Reproductibilité des résultats, Technique de prise d'empreinte (instrumentation).
- MESH :
- anatomie et histologie : Arcade dentaire.
- normes : Modèles dentaires.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire, Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier, Humains, Implants dentaires, Matériaux empreinte dentaire, Piliers dentaires, Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée, Reproductibilité des résultats, Technique de prise d'empreinte.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Dental Abutments, Dental Arch (anatomy & histology), Dental Implant-Abutment Design (methods), Dental Implants, Dental Impression Materials, Dental Impression Technique (instrumentation), Dental Models (standards), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Design (methods), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Reproducibility of Results.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants, Dental Impression Materials.
- anatomy & histology : Dental Arch.
- instrumentation : Dental Impression Technique.
- methods : Dental Implant-Abutment Design, Denture Design.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- standards : Dental Models.
- Dental Abutments, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Humans, Reproducibility of Results.
Abstract
The effect of different implant impression techniques on the accuracy of casts has been investigated mostly in vitro, and clinically relevant evidence is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of implant impression techniques--specifically, splinted versus nonsplinted--on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients.
PubMed: 22167432
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001389
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22167432Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Papaspyridakos, Panos" sort="Papaspyridakos, Panos" uniqKey="Papaspyridakos P" first="Panos" last="Papaspyridakos">Panos Papaspyridakos</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. panpapasyyridakos@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lal, Kunal" sort="Lal, Kunal" uniqKey="Lal K" first="Kunal" last="Lal">Kunal Lal</name></author><author><name sortKey="White, George Shelby" sort="White, George Shelby" uniqKey="White G" first="George Shelby" last="White">George Shelby White</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weber, Hans Peter" sort="Weber, Hans Peter" uniqKey="Weber H" first="Hans-Peter" last="Weber">Hans-Peter Weber</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gallucci, German O" sort="Gallucci, German O" uniqKey="Gallucci G" first="German O" last="Gallucci">German O. Gallucci</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2011 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22167432</idno><idno type="pmid">22167432</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001389</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001389</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001389</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001389</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Papaspyridakos, Panos" sort="Papaspyridakos, Panos" uniqKey="Papaspyridakos P" first="Panos" last="Papaspyridakos">Panos Papaspyridakos</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. panpapasyyridakos@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lal, Kunal" sort="Lal, Kunal" uniqKey="Lal K" first="Kunal" last="Lal">Kunal Lal</name></author><author><name sortKey="White, George Shelby" sort="White, George Shelby" uniqKey="White G" first="George Shelby" last="White">George Shelby White</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weber, Hans Peter" sort="Weber, Hans Peter" uniqKey="Weber H" first="Hans-Peter" last="Weber">Hans-Peter Weber</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gallucci, German O" sort="Gallucci, German O" uniqKey="Gallucci G" first="German O" last="Gallucci">German O. Gallucci</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="eISSN">1942-4434</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Arch (anatomy & histology)</term><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Impression Materials</term><term>Dental Impression Technique (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Models (standards)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture Design (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arcade dentaire (anatomie et histologie)</term><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire ()</term><term>Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier ()</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Matériaux empreinte dentaire</term><term>Modèles dentaires (normes)</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte (instrumentation)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Impression Materials</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomie et histologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arcade dentaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomy & histology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Arch</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Impression Technique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</term><term>Denture Design</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Modèles dentaires</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Models</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Conception d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term><term>Conception d'implant dentaire et de pilier</term><term>Humains</term><term>Implants dentaires</term><term>Matériaux empreinte dentaire</term><term>Piliers dentaires</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term><term>Technique de prise d'empreinte</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The effect of different implant impression techniques on the accuracy of casts has been investigated mostly in vitro, and clinically relevant evidence is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of implant impression techniques--specifically, splinted versus nonsplinted--on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22167432</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>03</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>14</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1942-4434</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>26</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2011 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1267-72</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The effect of different implant impression techniques on the accuracy of casts has been investigated mostly in vitro, and clinically relevant evidence is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of implant impression techniques--specifically, splinted versus nonsplinted--on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">This clinical study included 12 edentulous patients (13 edentulous arches). All patients had undergone computer-guided, prosthetically driven implant surgery. Splinted (with acrylic resin) and nonsplinted pickup implant impression techniques were used to generate two different casts. Intraoral verification jigs were made to fabricate a third index cast (prosthesis fabrication cast); these made up a control group. All patients were definitively rehabilitated with one-piece zirconia prostheses. The accuracy of fit of each prosthesis was evaluated indirectly by examining them clinically and radiographically while they were fit on the generated casts.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Of the 13 splinted casts, 12 presented with accurate clinical fit when the zirconia prosthesis was seated on its respective cast. Only 6 of the 13 nonsplinted casts showed accurate clinical fit. The zirconia prostheses fit accurately on all respective casts of the control group (prosthesis fabrication cast) as well as intraorally. The differences between the test groups and between the nonsplinted and control groups were statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found between the splinted and control groups.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">There is clinical evidence that the splinted impression technique generates more accurate implant impressions and master casts than the nonsplinted technique for complete-arch, one-piece fixed prostheses.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Papaspyridakos</LastName><ForeName>Panos</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. panpapasyyridakos@gmail.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lal</LastName><ForeName>Kunal</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>White</LastName><ForeName>George Shelby</ForeName><Initials>GS</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Weber</LastName><ForeName>Hans-Peter</ForeName><Initials>HP</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gallucci</LastName><ForeName>German O</ForeName><Initials>GO</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003760">Dental Impression Materials</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000044" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Abutments</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003724" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Arch</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000033" MajorTopicYN="N">anatomy & histology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D059605" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implant-Abutment Design</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003760" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Materials</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003761" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Impression Technique</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003765" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Models</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000592" MajorTopicYN="Y">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003779" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Design</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22167432</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001389 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001389 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22167432
|texte= Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22167432" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |