Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
Identifieur interne : 000A95 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000A94; suivant : 000A96Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
Auteurs : Michael D. Scherer ; Edwin A. Mcglumphy ; Robert R. Seghi ; Wayne V. CampagniSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 1942-4434 ]
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of number and distribution of implants upon in vitro dislodging forces to a simulated implant-supported overdenture and to examine differences between several different attachment systems.
PubMed: 24278931
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A95
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:24278931Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.</title><author><name sortKey="Scherer, Michael D" sort="Scherer, Michael D" uniqKey="Scherer M" first="Michael D" last="Scherer">Michael D. Scherer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" sort="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E" first="Edwin A" last="Mcglumphy">Edwin A. Mcglumphy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Seghi, Robert R" sort="Seghi, Robert R" uniqKey="Seghi R" first="Robert R" last="Seghi">Robert R. Seghi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Campagni, Wayne V" sort="Campagni, Wayne V" uniqKey="Campagni W" first="Wayne V" last="Campagni">Wayne V. Campagni</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2013 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:24278931</idno><idno type="pmid">24278931</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A95</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A95</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A95</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A95</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.</title><author><name sortKey="Scherer, Michael D" sort="Scherer, Michael D" uniqKey="Scherer M" first="Michael D" last="Scherer">Michael D. Scherer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" sort="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E" first="Edwin A" last="Mcglumphy">Edwin A. Mcglumphy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Seghi, Robert R" sort="Seghi, Robert R" uniqKey="Seghi R" first="Robert R" last="Seghi">Robert R. Seghi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Campagni, Wayne V" sort="Campagni, Wayne V" uniqKey="Campagni W" first="Wayne V" last="Campagni">Wayne V. Campagni</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="eISSN">1942-4434</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Stress Analysis (methods)</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse du stress dentaire ()</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Stress Analysis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Models</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse du stress dentaire</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire édentée</term><term>Overdenture</term><term>Prothèse dentaire implanto-portée</term><term>Rétention d'appareil de prothèse dentaire</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of number and distribution of implants upon in vitro dislodging forces to a simulated implant-supported overdenture and to examine differences between several different attachment systems.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">24278931</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1942-4434</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>28</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2013 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1619-28</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.11607/jomi.3067</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of number and distribution of implants upon in vitro dislodging forces to a simulated implant-supported overdenture and to examine differences between several different attachment systems.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">An experiment was undertaken utilizing a model simulating a mandibular edentulous ridge with dental implants in positions on the model approximating tooth positions in the natural dentition. A cobalt-chromium-cast testing framework was used to measure the peak load required to disconnect an attachment. Four different types of commercially available attachments were used in various positions on the model in sequence to evaluate the effects of retention and stability of overdentures based on implant number and distribution: (1) ERA, (2) O-Ring, (3) Locator, and (4) Ball. For each group, 10 measurements were made of peak dislodging forces. Means were calculated and differences among the systems, directions, and groups were identified using a repeated measured analysis of variance (α = .05).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The interactions between the attachment system, direction of force, and implant number and distribution were statistically significant. Vertical dislodging forces of the simulated overdenture prosthesis increased with additional widely spaced implants. Oblique dislodging forces of the simulated prosthesis increased with additional widely spaced implants except in the two-implant model with all attachments, and in the four-implant groups with Locator attachments. Anteroposterior dislodging forces of a simulated overdenture prosthesis increased with additional widely spaced implants except in the four-implant groups with Ball and Locator attachments. Ball attachments reported the highest levels of retention and stability followed by Locator, O-Ring, and ERA.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Within the limitations of this study, retention and stability of an implant overdenture prosthesis are significantly affected by implant number, implant distribution, and abutment type.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scherer</LastName><ForeName>Michael D</ForeName><Initials>MD</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>McGlumphy</LastName><ForeName>Edwin A</ForeName><Initials>EA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Seghi</LastName><ForeName>Robert R</ForeName><Initials>RR</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Campagni</LastName><ForeName>Wayne V</ForeName><Initials>WV</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003765" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003799" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Stress Analysis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24278931</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A95 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A95 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:24278931
|texte= Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:24278931" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |