Dental implants and decision making.
Identifieur interne : 004709 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 004708; suivant : 004710Dental implants and decision making.
Auteurs : G A Zarb ; D W LewisSource :
- Journal of dental education [ 0022-0337 ] ; 1992.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , economics : Dental Implants.
- rehabilitation : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Contraindications, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Health Status, Humans, Osseointegration, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Prognosis.
Abstract
Treatment choice and effectiveness in prosthodontics has largely depended on educated anecdote and asseveration. Still, this approach has to a very large extent enabled dentists to enrich the quality of their patients' lives. However, the trade-off between the need for prosthetic intervention per se and the biologic price inherent in certain therapeutic endeavors has demanded strict concerns regarding clinical decision making and treatment outcomes. The technique of implant prosthodontics is certainly one that has focussed such concerns, particularly since the concept of osseointegration was introduced to North American dentists at the 1982 Toronto Conference. Clinical research and opinion in this area have elicited both clinical euphoria and polarization vis-a-vis newer possibilities for resolving the predicaments of partial or complete edentulism. The past decade has witnessed clinical trials, as well as highly relevant exemplary reports, on the application of the osseointegration technique. It is now necessary to compare the merits of implant prosthodontics to traditional therapies, and to determine those criteria which comprise optimal functional and aesthetic restoration, with minimal risk of morbidity, along with cost concerns. This paper seeks to provide a systematic and rational basis for the identification of such criteria.
PubMed: 1487588
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:1487588Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dental implants and decision making.</title><author><name sortKey="Zarb, G A" sort="Zarb, G A" uniqKey="Zarb G" first="G A" last="Zarb">G A Zarb</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lewis, D W" sort="Lewis, D W" uniqKey="Lewis D" first="D W" last="Lewis">D W Lewis</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1992">1992</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:1487588</idno><idno type="pmid">1487588</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004709</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004709</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Dental implants and decision making.</title><author><name sortKey="Zarb, G A" sort="Zarb, G A" uniqKey="Zarb G" first="G A" last="Zarb">G A Zarb</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lewis, D W" sort="Lewis, D W" uniqKey="Lewis D" first="D W" last="Lewis">D W Lewis</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of dental education</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-0337</idno><imprint><date when="1992" type="published">1992</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Contraindications</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term><term>Decision Making</term><term>Decision Support Techniques</term><term>Dental Implants (economics)</term><term>Health Status</term><term>Humans</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</term><term>Prognosis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Contraindications</term><term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term><term>Decision Making</term><term>Decision Support Techniques</term><term>Health Status</term><term>Humans</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</term><term>Prognosis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Treatment choice and effectiveness in prosthodontics has largely depended on educated anecdote and asseveration. Still, this approach has to a very large extent enabled dentists to enrich the quality of their patients' lives. However, the trade-off between the need for prosthetic intervention per se and the biologic price inherent in certain therapeutic endeavors has demanded strict concerns regarding clinical decision making and treatment outcomes. The technique of implant prosthodontics is certainly one that has focussed such concerns, particularly since the concept of osseointegration was introduced to North American dentists at the 1982 Toronto Conference. Clinical research and opinion in this area have elicited both clinical euphoria and polarization vis-a-vis newer possibilities for resolving the predicaments of partial or complete edentulism. The past decade has witnessed clinical trials, as well as highly relevant exemplary reports, on the application of the osseointegration technique. It is now necessary to compare the merits of implant prosthodontics to traditional therapies, and to determine those criteria which comprise optimal functional and aesthetic restoration, with minimal risk of morbidity, along with cost concerns. This paper seeks to provide a systematic and rational basis for the identification of such criteria.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">1487588</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1993</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>16</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-0337</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>56</Volume><Issue>12</Issue><PubDate><Year>1992</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of dental education</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Dent Educ</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Dental implants and decision making.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>863-72</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Treatment choice and effectiveness in prosthodontics has largely depended on educated anecdote and asseveration. Still, this approach has to a very large extent enabled dentists to enrich the quality of their patients' lives. However, the trade-off between the need for prosthetic intervention per se and the biologic price inherent in certain therapeutic endeavors has demanded strict concerns regarding clinical decision making and treatment outcomes. The technique of implant prosthodontics is certainly one that has focussed such concerns, particularly since the concept of osseointegration was introduced to North American dentists at the 1982 Toronto Conference. Clinical research and opinion in this area have elicited both clinical euphoria and polarization vis-a-vis newer possibilities for resolving the predicaments of partial or complete edentulism. The past decade has witnessed clinical trials, as well as highly relevant exemplary reports, on the application of the osseointegration technique. It is now necessary to compare the merits of implant prosthodontics to traditional therapies, and to determine those criteria which comprise optimal functional and aesthetic restoration, with minimal risk of morbidity, along with cost concerns. This paper seeks to provide a systematic and rational basis for the identification of such criteria.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zarb</LastName><ForeName>G A</ForeName><Initials>GA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lewis</LastName><ForeName>D W</ForeName><Initials>DW</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Dent Educ</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8000150</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-0337</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000075202" MajorTopicYN="N">Contraindications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003657" MajorTopicYN="Y">Decision Making</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003661" MajorTopicYN="Y">Decision Support Techniques</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006304" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Status</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010043" MajorTopicYN="N">Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011379" MajorTopicYN="N">Prognosis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><NumberOfReferences>33</NumberOfReferences></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1992</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1992</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1992</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">1487588</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004709 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004709 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:1487588
|texte= Dental implants and decision making.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:1487588" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |