Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Identifieur interne : 004247 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 004246; suivant : 004248Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Auteurs : E W Lam ; A. Ruprecht ; J. YangSource :
- The Journal of prosthetic dentistry [ 0022-3913 ] ; 1995.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging), Cephalometry, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (diagnostic imaging), Maxilla (surgery), Patient Care Planning, Radiographic Image Enhancement (methods), Radiography, Panoramic, Regression Analysis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Process, Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- methods : Radiographic Image Enhancement.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Cephalometry, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Radiography, Panoramic, Regression Analysis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Abstract
The widespread use of dental implants in partially and completely edentulous patients has brought about a need to preoperatively depict and quantify accurate bone height and contour. A number of conventional intraoral and extraoral radiographic techniques have been used, including the relatively new modality of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography. Despite rapid advances in imaging technology, many clinicians continue to rely on techniques such as panoramic radiography that produce images that distort the jaws nonuniformly. This study compared bone height measurements of jaws made with these two imaging modalities. Nineteen sites in 10 patients were imaged with both techniques and mean bone height was determined for each imaging technique and site. Significant differences were found between mean bone heights measured with the two imaging modalities (p < 0.0005). Situations in which the use of dental implants would be particularly advantageous demonstrated the largest discrepancies, that is, when bone height measurements were less than 15 mm.
PubMed: 7674189
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:7674189Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.</title><author><name sortKey="Lam, E W" sort="Lam, E W" uniqKey="Lam E" first="E W" last="Lam">E W Lam</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ruprecht, A" sort="Ruprecht, A" uniqKey="Ruprecht A" first="A" last="Ruprecht">A. Ruprecht</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yang, J" sort="Yang, J" uniqKey="Yang J" first="J" last="Yang">J. Yang</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1995">1995</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:7674189</idno><idno type="pmid">7674189</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004247</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004247</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.</title><author><name sortKey="Lam, E W" sort="Lam, E W" uniqKey="Lam E" first="E W" last="Lam">E W Lam</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ruprecht, A" sort="Ruprecht, A" uniqKey="Ruprecht A" first="A" last="Ruprecht">A. Ruprecht</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yang, J" sort="Yang, J" uniqKey="Yang J" first="J" last="Yang">J. Yang</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-3913</idno><imprint><date when="1995" type="published">1995</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Cephalometry</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement (methods)</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Radiographic Image Enhancement</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Cephalometry</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The widespread use of dental implants in partially and completely edentulous patients has brought about a need to preoperatively depict and quantify accurate bone height and contour. A number of conventional intraoral and extraoral radiographic techniques have been used, including the relatively new modality of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography. Despite rapid advances in imaging technology, many clinicians continue to rely on techniques such as panoramic radiography that produce images that distort the jaws nonuniformly. This study compared bone height measurements of jaws made with these two imaging modalities. Nineteen sites in 10 patients were imaged with both techniques and mean bone height was determined for each imaging technique and site. Significant differences were found between mean bone heights measured with the two imaging modalities (p < 0.0005). Situations in which the use of dental implants would be particularly advantageous demonstrated the largest discrepancies, that is, when bone height measurements were less than 15 mm.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">7674189</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1995</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>23</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-3913</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>74</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1995</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Prosthet Dent</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>42-6</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The widespread use of dental implants in partially and completely edentulous patients has brought about a need to preoperatively depict and quantify accurate bone height and contour. A number of conventional intraoral and extraoral radiographic techniques have been used, including the relatively new modality of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography. Despite rapid advances in imaging technology, many clinicians continue to rely on techniques such as panoramic radiography that produce images that distort the jaws nonuniformly. This study compared bone height measurements of jaws made with these two imaging modalities. Nineteen sites in 10 patients were imaged with both techniques and mean bone height was determined for each imaging technique and site. Significant differences were found between mean bone heights measured with the two imaging modalities (p < 0.0005). Situations in which the use of dental implants would be particularly advantageous demonstrated the largest discrepancies, that is, when bone height measurements were less than 15 mm.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lam</LastName><ForeName>E W</ForeName><Initials>EW</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ruprecht</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Yang</LastName><ForeName>J</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Prosthet Dent</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0376364</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0022-3913</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000539" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Process</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002508" MajorTopicYN="N">Cephalometry</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011856" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiographic Image Enhancement</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011862" MajorTopicYN="Y">Radiography, Panoramic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012044" MajorTopicYN="N">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="Y">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1995</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1995</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1995</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7674189</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004247 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004247 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:7674189
|texte= Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:7674189" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |