Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism.
Identifieur interne : 004159 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 004158; suivant : 004160Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism.
Auteurs : P I Br Nemark ; B. Svensson ; D. Van SteenbergheSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 1995.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Abutments, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention (statistics & numerical data), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Female, Humans, Life Tables, Male, Matched-Pair Analysis, Middle Aged, Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Mouth, Edentulous (surgery), Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Prosthesis Failure, Retrospective Studies.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- rehabilitation : Mouth, Edentulous.
- statistics & numerical data : Dental Prosthesis Retention.
- surgery : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Abutments, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Female, Humans, Life Tables, Male, Matched-Pair Analysis, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Prosthesis Failure, Retrospective Studies.
Abstract
A series of 156 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw-shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10-year follow-up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age- and gender-matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10-year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.
PubMed: 8603114
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:8603114Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism.</title><author><name sortKey="Br Nemark, P I" sort="Br Nemark, P I" uniqKey="Br Nemark P" first="P I" last="Br Nemark">P I Br Nemark</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, B" sort="Svensson, B" uniqKey="Svensson B" first="B" last="Svensson">B. Svensson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1995">1995</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8603114</idno><idno type="pmid">8603114</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">004159</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">004159</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism.</title><author><name sortKey="Br Nemark, P I" sort="Br Nemark, P I" uniqKey="Br Nemark P" first="P I" last="Br Nemark">P I Br Nemark</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Svensson, B" sort="Svensson, B" uniqKey="Svensson B" first="B" last="Svensson">B. Svensson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, D" sort="Van Steenberghe, D" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="D" last="Van Steenberghe">D. Van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="1995" type="published">1995</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Male</term><term>Matched-Pair Analysis</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</term><term>Prosthesis Failure</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Male</term><term>Matched-Pair Analysis</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</term><term>Prosthesis Failure</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A series of 156 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw-shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10-year follow-up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age- and gender-matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10-year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">8603114</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1996</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>6</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>1995</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>227-31</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>A series of 156 consecutive fully edentulous patients were rehabilitated by means of fixed prostheses on either 4 or 6 screw-shaped titanium implants. This retrospective study calculated survival rates for both prostheses and individual implants. Only patients with a 10-year follow-up were considered. The implant lengths were 10 (90%) or 7 mm. They were all inserted after pretapping. In the mandible 13 and 59 prostheses were installed on respectively 4 and 6 implants. In the upper jaw the respective numbers were 14 and 70. Both groups (4 versus 6 implants) were age- and gender-matched. A reduced jaw bone volume was the major reason for limiting the number of implants to 4. Although a tendency existed for an increased failure rate in patients with only 4 implants, the survival rate for both individual implants and prostheses was the same in both groups at the end of the 10-year observation period. The present tendency of some clinicians to install as many implants as possible in full edentulism should be seriously questioned.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Brånemark</LastName><ForeName>P I</ForeName><Initials>PI</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institute for Applied Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Svensson</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Steenberghe</LastName><ForeName>D</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000044" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Abutments</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015993" MajorTopicYN="N">Life Tables</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016555" MajorTopicYN="N">Matched-Pair Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010043" MajorTopicYN="N">Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011475" MajorTopicYN="N">Prosthesis Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1995</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1995</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1995</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8603114</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004159 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 004159 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8603114
|texte= Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8603114" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |