Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans.
Identifieur interne : 003F70 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003F69; suivant : 003F71Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans.
Auteurs : M. Simion ; A. Scarano ; L. Gionso ; A. PiattelliSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 0882-2786 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Alveolar Process (pathology), Biopsy, Bone Regeneration, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (instrumentation), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Lactic Acid, Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Mouth, Edentulous (surgery), Osteogenesis, Polyesters, Polymers, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Titanium, Tooth Extraction, Wound Healing.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants, Lactic Acid, Membranes, Artificial, Polyesters, Polymers, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Titanium.
- instrumentation : Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal.
- pathology : Alveolar Process.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mouth, Edentulous.
- Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Bone Regeneration, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteogenesis, Tooth Extraction, Wound Healing.
Abstract
Resorbable membranes of poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolic acid) (PLA/PGA) were compared to nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes in the treatment of defects around titanium dental implants placed in postextraction sockets. Two partially edentulous and three completely edentulous patients requiring implant-supported restorations participated. Sixteen Brånemark implants were placed into extraction sockets and covered with modified titanium cover screws, called harvest cover screws, which allow tissue biopsy at second-stage implant surgery. Seven defects were treated with PLA/PGA membranes, five were treated with e-PTFE membranes, and four were left untreated (control sites). After 6 months of healing, the harvest cover screws were retrieved and processed for light microscopy examination together with the regenerated tissues. Very little or no bone formation was detected in control specimens. The e-PTFE membranes were found to be the most effective barrier material, in that denser and a greater amount of regenerated bone was found. The PLA/PGA membranes produced some bone regeneration when compared to control sites, but to a lesser extent compared to e-PTFE sites.
PubMed: 8990634
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:8990634Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans.</title><author><name sortKey="Simion, M" sort="Simion, M" uniqKey="Simion M" first="M" last="Simion">M. Simion</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dentistry, University of Milan, San Raffaele Hospital, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Scarano, A" sort="Scarano, A" uniqKey="Scarano A" first="A" last="Scarano">A. Scarano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gionso, L" sort="Gionso, L" uniqKey="Gionso L" first="L" last="Gionso">L. Gionso</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, A" sort="Piattelli, A" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="A" last="Piattelli">A. Piattelli</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>1996 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:8990634</idno><idno type="pmid">8990634</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003F70</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003F70</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans.</title><author><name sortKey="Simion, M" sort="Simion, M" uniqKey="Simion M" first="M" last="Simion">M. Simion</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Dentistry, University of Milan, San Raffaele Hospital, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Scarano, A" sort="Scarano, A" uniqKey="Scarano A" first="A" last="Scarano">A. Scarano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gionso, L" sort="Gionso, L" uniqKey="Gionso L" first="L" last="Gionso">L. Gionso</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, A" sort="Piattelli, A" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="A" last="Piattelli">A. Piattelli</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="ISSN">0882-2786</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Process (pathology)</term><term>Biopsy</term><term>Bone Regeneration</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (instrumentation)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Lactic Acid</term><term>Membranes, Artificial</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Osteogenesis</term><term>Polyesters</term><term>Polymers</term><term>Polytetrafluoroethylene</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Tooth Extraction</term><term>Wound Healing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Lactic Acid</term><term>Membranes, Artificial</term><term>Polyesters</term><term>Polymers</term><term>Polytetrafluoroethylene</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Biopsy</term><term>Bone Regeneration</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osteogenesis</term><term>Tooth Extraction</term><term>Wound Healing</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Resorbable membranes of poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolic acid) (PLA/PGA) were compared to nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes in the treatment of defects around titanium dental implants placed in postextraction sockets. Two partially edentulous and three completely edentulous patients requiring implant-supported restorations participated. Sixteen Brånemark implants were placed into extraction sockets and covered with modified titanium cover screws, called harvest cover screws, which allow tissue biopsy at second-stage implant surgery. Seven defects were treated with PLA/PGA membranes, five were treated with e-PTFE membranes, and four were left untreated (control sites). After 6 months of healing, the harvest cover screws were retrieved and processed for light microscopy examination together with the regenerated tissues. Very little or no bone formation was detected in control specimens. The e-PTFE membranes were found to be the most effective barrier material, in that denser and a greater amount of regenerated bone was found. The PLA/PGA membranes produced some bone regeneration when compared to control sites, but to a lesser extent compared to e-PTFE sites.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">8990634</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1997</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0882-2786</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>11</Volume><Issue>6</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>1996 Nov-Dec</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>735-42</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Resorbable membranes of poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolic acid) (PLA/PGA) were compared to nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes in the treatment of defects around titanium dental implants placed in postextraction sockets. Two partially edentulous and three completely edentulous patients requiring implant-supported restorations participated. Sixteen Brånemark implants were placed into extraction sockets and covered with modified titanium cover screws, called harvest cover screws, which allow tissue biopsy at second-stage implant surgery. Seven defects were treated with PLA/PGA membranes, five were treated with e-PTFE membranes, and four were left untreated (control sites). After 6 months of healing, the harvest cover screws were retrieved and processed for light microscopy examination together with the regenerated tissues. Very little or no bone formation was detected in control specimens. The e-PTFE membranes were found to be the most effective barrier material, in that denser and a greater amount of regenerated bone was found. The PLA/PGA membranes produced some bone regeneration when compared to control sites, but to a lesser extent compared to e-PTFE sites.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Simion</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Dentistry, University of Milan, San Raffaele Hospital, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scarano</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gionso</LastName><ForeName>L</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Piattelli</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D008567">Membranes, Artificial</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011091">Polyesters</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011108">Polymers</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>33X04XA5AT</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D019344">Lactic Acid</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>459TN2L5F5</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C033616">poly(lactide)</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>9002-84-0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011138">Polytetrafluoroethylene</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>D1JT611TNE</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014025">Titanium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000539" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Process</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001706" MajorTopicYN="N">Biopsy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001861" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Regeneration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016557" MajorTopicYN="Y">Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019344" MajorTopicYN="N">Lactic Acid</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008567" MajorTopicYN="Y">Membranes, Artificial</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010012" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteogenesis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011091" MajorTopicYN="N">Polyesters</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011108" MajorTopicYN="N">Polymers</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011138" MajorTopicYN="N">Polytetrafluoroethylene</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014025" MajorTopicYN="N">Titanium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014081" MajorTopicYN="N">Tooth Extraction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014945" MajorTopicYN="N">Wound Healing</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1996</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1996</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1996</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8990634</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F70 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003F70 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:8990634
|texte= Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:8990634" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |