Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.
Identifieur interne : 003F28 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003F27; suivant : 003F29Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.
Auteurs : G. Scaf ; A G Lurie ; K M Mosier ; M L Kantor ; G R Ramsby ; M L FreedmanSource :
- Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics [ 1079-2104 ] ; 1997.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Health Care Costs, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced (etiology), Patient Care Planning, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiation Dosage, Radiography, Dental (adverse effects), Radiography, Dental (economics), Risk Assessment, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, Tomography, X-Ray (adverse effects), Tomography, X-Ray (economics), Tomography, X-Ray Computed (adverse effects), Tomography, X-Ray Computed (economics).
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Radiography, Dental, Tomography, X-Ray, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous.
- economics : Radiography, Dental, Tomography, X-Ray, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- etiology : Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced.
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Health Care Costs, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiation Dosage, Risk Assessment, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry.
Abstract
Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure radiation doses at craniofacial sites in a tissue-equivalent phantom during film-based multidirectional tomography with the Tomax Ultrascan (Incubation Industries, Ivyland, Pa.) and during computed tomography with the Elscint Excel 2400 (Elscint Corp., Tel Aviv, Israel). Mean absorbed doses for presurgical mandibular and maxillary canine and molar implant assessments were converted to equivalent doses, which were then multiplied by published weighting factors and summed to give effective doses. The computed tomography device consistently delivered higher doses than the Tomax Ultrascan to all anatomic locations; the differences were most pronounced when only one or two implant sites were evaluated. The reasons for the dose disparities are considered both anatomically and procedurally. A survey of examination cost revealed film-based multidirectional tomography to be less expensive than computed tomography.
PubMed: 9007922
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:9007922Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.</title><author><name sortKey="Scaf, G" sort="Scaf, G" uniqKey="Scaf G" first="G" last="Scaf">G. Scaf</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara-UNESP, School of Dental Medicine, Barzil.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lurie, A G" sort="Lurie, A G" uniqKey="Lurie A" first="A G" last="Lurie">A G Lurie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mosier, K M" sort="Mosier, K M" uniqKey="Mosier K" first="K M" last="Mosier">K M Mosier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kantor, M L" sort="Kantor, M L" uniqKey="Kantor M" first="M L" last="Kantor">M L Kantor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ramsby, G R" sort="Ramsby, G R" uniqKey="Ramsby G" first="G R" last="Ramsby">G R Ramsby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freedman, M L" sort="Freedman, M L" uniqKey="Freedman M" first="M L" last="Freedman">M L Freedman</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1997">1997</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:9007922</idno><idno type="pmid">9007922</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003F28</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003F28</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.</title><author><name sortKey="Scaf, G" sort="Scaf, G" uniqKey="Scaf G" first="G" last="Scaf">G. Scaf</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara-UNESP, School of Dental Medicine, Barzil.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lurie, A G" sort="Lurie, A G" uniqKey="Lurie A" first="A G" last="Lurie">A G Lurie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mosier, K M" sort="Mosier, K M" uniqKey="Mosier K" first="K M" last="Mosier">K M Mosier</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kantor, M L" sort="Kantor, M L" uniqKey="Kantor M" first="M L" last="Kantor">M L Kantor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ramsby, G R" sort="Ramsby, G R" uniqKey="Ramsby G" first="G R" last="Ramsby">G R Ramsby</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freedman, M L" sort="Freedman, M L" uniqKey="Freedman M" first="M L" last="Freedman">M L Freedman</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics</title><idno type="ISSN">1079-2104</idno><imprint><date when="1997" type="published">1997</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Health Care Costs</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced (etiology)</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Phantoms, Imaging</term><term>Radiation Dosage</term><term>Radiography, Dental (adverse effects)</term><term>Radiography, Dental (economics)</term><term>Risk Assessment</term><term>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray (adverse effects)</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray (economics)</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed (adverse effects)</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed (economics)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Radiography, Dental</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Radiography, Dental</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Health Care Costs</term><term>Humans</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Phantoms, Imaging</term><term>Radiation Dosage</term><term>Risk Assessment</term><term>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure radiation doses at craniofacial sites in a tissue-equivalent phantom during film-based multidirectional tomography with the Tomax Ultrascan (Incubation Industries, Ivyland, Pa.) and during computed tomography with the Elscint Excel 2400 (Elscint Corp., Tel Aviv, Israel). Mean absorbed doses for presurgical mandibular and maxillary canine and molar implant assessments were converted to equivalent doses, which were then multiplied by published weighting factors and summed to give effective doses. The computed tomography device consistently delivered higher doses than the Tomax Ultrascan to all anatomic locations; the differences were most pronounced when only one or two implant sites were evaluated. The reasons for the dose disparities are considered both anatomically and procedurally. A survey of examination cost revealed film-based multidirectional tomography to be less expensive than computed tomography.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">9007922</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1997</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1079-2104</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>83</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>1997</Year><Month>Jan</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>41-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure radiation doses at craniofacial sites in a tissue-equivalent phantom during film-based multidirectional tomography with the Tomax Ultrascan (Incubation Industries, Ivyland, Pa.) and during computed tomography with the Elscint Excel 2400 (Elscint Corp., Tel Aviv, Israel). Mean absorbed doses for presurgical mandibular and maxillary canine and molar implant assessments were converted to equivalent doses, which were then multiplied by published weighting factors and summed to give effective doses. The computed tomography device consistently delivered higher doses than the Tomax Ultrascan to all anatomic locations; the differences were most pronounced when only one or two implant sites were evaluated. The reasons for the dose disparities are considered both anatomically and procedurally. A survey of examination cost revealed film-based multidirectional tomography to be less expensive than computed tomography.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scaf</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara-UNESP, School of Dental Medicine, Barzil.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lurie</LastName><ForeName>A G</ForeName><Initials>AG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mosier</LastName><ForeName>K M</ForeName><Initials>KM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kantor</LastName><ForeName>M L</ForeName><Initials>ML</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ramsby</LastName><ForeName>G R</ForeName><Initials>GR</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Freedman</LastName><ForeName>M L</ForeName><Initials>ML</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9508562</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1079-2104</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017048" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Care Costs</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009381" MajorTopicYN="N">Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019047" MajorTopicYN="N">Phantoms, Imaging</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011829" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiation Dosage</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011861" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Dental</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="Y">economics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018570" MajorTopicYN="N">Risk Assessment</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013819" MajorTopicYN="N">Thermoluminescent Dosimetry</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014056" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1997</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1997</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1997</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9007922</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1079-2104(97)90089-5</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F28 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003F28 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:9007922
|texte= Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film-based and computed tomography.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9007922" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |