Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study.
Identifieur interne : 003B12 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003B11; suivant : 003B13Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study.
Auteurs : G. Widmark ; B. Andersson ; B. Andrup ; G E Carlsson ; C J Ivanoff ; A M LindvallSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 0882-2786 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods), Bone Resorption (surgery), Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Upper, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Survival, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mastication, Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Bone Resorption, Jaw, Edentulous, Maxilla.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Upper, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Survival, Humans, Male, Mastication, Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Forty-three patients with severely resorbed maxillae who had been referred for implant treatment were assigned to one of three treatment groups: bone grafting and implant placement (graft group); modified implant placement but no bone grafting (trial group); or optimized complete dentures (no-implant group). Sixteen, 20, and 7 patients, respectively, were assigned to the three groups. At the 1-year follow-up, 10% of the implants had been lost. Only a few of the failures (3/22) occurred after prosthesis placement. The cumulative success rates were 83% in the graft group and 96% in the trial group. A substantial reduction of the grafted bone, especially of the onlay grafts, occurred in many patients. During the period from prosthesis connection to the 1-year follow-up, marginal peri-implant bone loss was on average 0.5 mm. Despite the often demanding procedures involved, all but one patient in each implant group said that they would undergo the treatment again. Most patients were very satisfied with the treatment outcome and their improved masticatory ability. Those who had renounced implant treatment appeared modestly adapted to their optimized dentures, but reported retention problems and less satisfaction with mastication.
PubMed: 9714953
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:9714953Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study.</title><author><name sortKey="Widmark, G" sort="Widmark, G" uniqKey="Widmark G" first="G" last="Widmark">G. Widmark</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Bohus County Public Dental Service, Mölndal Hospital, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, B" sort="Andersson, B" uniqKey="Andersson B" first="B" last="Andersson">B. Andersson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Andrup, B" sort="Andrup, B" uniqKey="Andrup B" first="B" last="Andrup">B. Andrup</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, G E" sort="Carlsson, G E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="G E" last="Carlsson">G E Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ivanoff, C J" sort="Ivanoff, C J" uniqKey="Ivanoff C" first="C J" last="Ivanoff">C J Ivanoff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindvall, A M" sort="Lindvall, A M" uniqKey="Lindvall A" first="A M" last="Lindvall">A M Lindvall</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>1998 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:9714953</idno><idno type="pmid">9714953</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003B12</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003B12</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study.</title><author><name sortKey="Widmark, G" sort="Widmark, G" uniqKey="Widmark G" first="G" last="Widmark">G. Widmark</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Bohus County Public Dental Service, Mölndal Hospital, Sweden.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Andersson, B" sort="Andersson, B" uniqKey="Andersson B" first="B" last="Andersson">B. Andersson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Andrup, B" sort="Andrup, B" uniqKey="Andrup B" first="B" last="Andrup">B. Andrup</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, G E" sort="Carlsson, G E" uniqKey="Carlsson G" first="G E" last="Carlsson">G E Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ivanoff, C J" sort="Ivanoff, C J" uniqKey="Ivanoff C" first="C J" last="Ivanoff">C J Ivanoff</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindvall, A M" sort="Lindvall, A M" uniqKey="Lindvall A" first="A M" last="Lindvall">A M Lindvall</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="ISSN">0882-2786</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term><term>Bone Resorption (surgery)</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Complete, Upper</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Graft Survival</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mastication</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Complete, Upper</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Graft Survival</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mastication</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Forty-three patients with severely resorbed maxillae who had been referred for implant treatment were assigned to one of three treatment groups: bone grafting and implant placement (graft group); modified implant placement but no bone grafting (trial group); or optimized complete dentures (no-implant group). Sixteen, 20, and 7 patients, respectively, were assigned to the three groups. At the 1-year follow-up, 10% of the implants had been lost. Only a few of the failures (3/22) occurred after prosthesis placement. The cumulative success rates were 83% in the graft group and 96% in the trial group. A substantial reduction of the grafted bone, especially of the onlay grafts, occurred in many patients. During the period from prosthesis connection to the 1-year follow-up, marginal peri-implant bone loss was on average 0.5 mm. Despite the often demanding procedures involved, all but one patient in each implant group said that they would undergo the treatment again. Most patients were very satisfied with the treatment outcome and their improved masticatory ability. Those who had renounced implant treatment appeared modestly adapted to their optimized dentures, but reported retention problems and less satisfaction with mastication.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">9714953</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>1998</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0882-2786</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>13</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>1998 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>474-82</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Forty-three patients with severely resorbed maxillae who had been referred for implant treatment were assigned to one of three treatment groups: bone grafting and implant placement (graft group); modified implant placement but no bone grafting (trial group); or optimized complete dentures (no-implant group). Sixteen, 20, and 7 patients, respectively, were assigned to the three groups. At the 1-year follow-up, 10% of the implants had been lost. Only a few of the failures (3/22) occurred after prosthesis placement. The cumulative success rates were 83% in the graft group and 96% in the trial group. A substantial reduction of the grafted bone, especially of the onlay grafts, occurred in many patients. During the period from prosthesis connection to the 1-year follow-up, marginal peri-implant bone loss was on average 0.5 mm. Despite the often demanding procedures involved, all but one patient in each implant group said that they would undergo the treatment again. Most patients were very satisfied with the treatment outcome and their improved masticatory ability. Those who had renounced implant treatment appeared modestly adapted to their optimized dentures, but reported retention problems and less satisfaction with mastication.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Widmark</LastName><ForeName>G</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Bohus County Public Dental Service, Mölndal Hospital, Sweden.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Andersson</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Andrup</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Carlsson</LastName><ForeName>G E</ForeName><Initials>GE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ivanoff</LastName><ForeName>C J</ForeName><Initials>CJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lindvall</LastName><ForeName>A M</ForeName><Initials>AM</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="Y">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001862" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Resorption</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="Y">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003827" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Complete, Upper</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006085" MajorTopicYN="N">Graft Survival</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008409" MajorTopicYN="N">Mastication</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1998</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>26</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1998</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1998</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9714953</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003B12 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003B12 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:9714953
|texte= Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:9714953" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |