A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging.
Identifieur interne : 003A54 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003A53; suivant : 003A55A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging.
Auteurs : W C ScarfeSource :
- Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons [ 0158-1570 ] ; 1998.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Patient Care Planning, Radiography, Dental (methods), Radiography, Panoramic, Temporomandibular Joint (diagnostic imaging), Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (diagnostic imaging), Tomography (instrumentation), Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Temporomandibular Joint, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.
- instrumentation : Tomography.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Radiography, Dental.
- Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Patient Care Planning, Radiography, Panoramic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Abstract
During the last two decades, computer-based imaging technology has contributed significantly to our assessment of patients with head and neck anomalies. For instance, magnetic resonance imaging has given us a modality for visualizing the hard and soft tissues of the temporomandibular joint. We are fortunate that this has led to the refinement of the concepts of normality and the characterization of non-normal conditions. In the pre-surgical assessment of alveolar bone prior to implant placement, tomography in its various forms has provided the possibility of three dimensional bony assessment thus potentially optimizing fixture placement and minimizing potential failure. Unfortunately, there has been a reluctance to employ these techniques as they are either not available or both the equipment and the cost of image acquisition time is too expensive. Until recently, there has been a lack of consensus as to the selection of imaging modalities appropriate to patient presentation and the clinical value of the information obtained. The more recent development of computer-controlled panoramic imaging has made available to us many special projections which are capable of producing hard tissue images of either the TMJ or a potential implant site in multiple dimensions at lower cost (both financially and in terms of X-ray dose) than the more advanced modalities. These projections can now be incorporated into a clinically determined patient-based protocol and thus provide the clinician with both an economical and common sense approach to diagnostic imaging.
PubMed: 10895612
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:10895612Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging.</title><author><name sortKey="Scarfe, W C" sort="Scarfe, W C" uniqKey="Scarfe W" first="W C" last="Scarfe">W C Scarfe</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Division of Radiology and Imaging Science at the University of Louisville, Kentucky.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1998">1998</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:10895612</idno><idno type="pmid">10895612</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003A54</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003A54</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging.</title><author><name sortKey="Scarfe, W C" sort="Scarfe, W C" uniqKey="Scarfe W" first="W C" last="Scarfe">W C Scarfe</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Division of Radiology and Imaging Science at the University of Louisville, Kentucky.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons</title><idno type="ISSN">0158-1570</idno><imprint><date when="1998" type="published">1998</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Evidence-Based Medicine</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiography, Dental (methods)</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Temporomandibular Joint (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Tomography (instrumentation)</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Temporomandibular Joint</term><term>Temporomandibular Joint Disorders</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Tomography</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Radiography, Dental</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Evidence-Based Medicine</term><term>Humans</term><term>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">During the last two decades, computer-based imaging technology has contributed significantly to our assessment of patients with head and neck anomalies. For instance, magnetic resonance imaging has given us a modality for visualizing the hard and soft tissues of the temporomandibular joint. We are fortunate that this has led to the refinement of the concepts of normality and the characterization of non-normal conditions. In the pre-surgical assessment of alveolar bone prior to implant placement, tomography in its various forms has provided the possibility of three dimensional bony assessment thus potentially optimizing fixture placement and minimizing potential failure. Unfortunately, there has been a reluctance to employ these techniques as they are either not available or both the equipment and the cost of image acquisition time is too expensive. Until recently, there has been a lack of consensus as to the selection of imaging modalities appropriate to patient presentation and the clinical value of the information obtained. The more recent development of computer-controlled panoramic imaging has made available to us many special projections which are capable of producing hard tissue images of either the TMJ or a potential implant site in multiple dimensions at lower cost (both financially and in terms of X-ray dose) than the more advanced modalities. These projections can now be incorporated into a clinically determined patient-based protocol and thus provide the clinician with both an economical and common sense approach to diagnostic imaging.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">10895612</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2000</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>18</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0158-1570</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>14</Volume><PubDate><Year>1998</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>48-61</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>During the last two decades, computer-based imaging technology has contributed significantly to our assessment of patients with head and neck anomalies. For instance, magnetic resonance imaging has given us a modality for visualizing the hard and soft tissues of the temporomandibular joint. We are fortunate that this has led to the refinement of the concepts of normality and the characterization of non-normal conditions. In the pre-surgical assessment of alveolar bone prior to implant placement, tomography in its various forms has provided the possibility of three dimensional bony assessment thus potentially optimizing fixture placement and minimizing potential failure. Unfortunately, there has been a reluctance to employ these techniques as they are either not available or both the equipment and the cost of image acquisition time is too expensive. Until recently, there has been a lack of consensus as to the selection of imaging modalities appropriate to patient presentation and the clinical value of the information obtained. The more recent development of computer-controlled panoramic imaging has made available to us many special projections which are capable of producing hard tissue images of either the TMJ or a potential implant site in multiple dimensions at lower cost (both financially and in terms of X-ray dose) than the more advanced modalities. These projections can now be incorporated into a clinically determined patient-based protocol and thus provide the clinician with both an economical and common sense approach to diagnostic imaging.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scarfe</LastName><ForeName>W C</ForeName><Initials>WC</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Division of Radiology and Imaging Science at the University of Louisville, Kentucky.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Australia</Country><MedlineTA>Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8006208</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0158-1570</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019317" MajorTopicYN="N">Evidence-Based Medicine</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008279" MajorTopicYN="N">Magnetic Resonance Imaging</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011861" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Dental</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011862" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Panoramic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013704" MajorTopicYN="N">Temporomandibular Joint</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013705" MajorTopicYN="N">Temporomandibular Joint Disorders</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014054" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><NumberOfReferences>68</NumberOfReferences></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2000</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2000</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2000</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10895612</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003A54 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003A54 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:10895612
|texte= A common sense approach to TMJ and implant imaging.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:10895612" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |