A comparison of labial and crestal incisions for the 1-stage placement of IMZ implants: a pilot study.
Identifieur interne : 003636 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003635; suivant : 003637A comparison of labial and crestal incisions for the 1-stage placement of IMZ implants: a pilot study.
Auteurs : K. Heydenrijk ; G M Raghoebar ; R H Batenburg ; B. StegengaSource :
- Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons [ 0278-2391 ] ; 2000.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Alveolar Bone Loss (rehabilitation), Alveolar Process (surgery), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (adverse effects), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Gingival Recession (etiology), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Mouth Mucosa (surgery), Pilot Projects.
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- etiology : Gingival Recession.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- rehabilitation : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Alveolar Process, Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Mouth Mucosa.
- Adult, Aged, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the crestal incision with the labial flap design when inserting a 2-stage implant system in a nonsubmerged manner.
DOI: 10.1053/joms.2000.9570
PubMed: 11021706
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11021706Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of labial and crestal incisions for the 1-stage placement of IMZ implants: a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Heydenrijk, K" sort="Heydenrijk, K" uniqKey="Heydenrijk K" first="K" last="Heydenrijk">K. Heydenrijk</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands. k.heydenrijk@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Batenburg, R H" sort="Batenburg, R H" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="R H" last="Batenburg">R H Batenburg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2000">2000</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11021706</idno><idno type="pmid">11021706</idno><idno type="doi">10.1053/joms.2000.9570</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003636</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003636</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of labial and crestal incisions for the 1-stage placement of IMZ implants: a pilot study.</title><author><name sortKey="Heydenrijk, K" sort="Heydenrijk, K" uniqKey="Heydenrijk K" first="K" last="Heydenrijk">K. Heydenrijk</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands. k.heydenrijk@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, G M" sort="Raghoebar, G M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="G M" last="Raghoebar">G M Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Batenburg, R H" sort="Batenburg, R H" uniqKey="Batenburg R" first="R H" last="Batenburg">R H Batenburg</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" sort="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="B" last="Stegenga">B. Stegenga</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</title><idno type="ISSN">0278-2391</idno><imprint><date when="2000" type="published">2000</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (rehabilitation)</term><term>Alveolar Process (surgery)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (adverse effects)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Gingival Recession (etiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Mouth Mucosa (surgery)</term><term>Pilot Projects</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Gingival Recession</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mouth Mucosa</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pilot Projects</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to compare the crestal incision with the labial flap design when inserting a 2-stage implant system in a nonsubmerged manner.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11021706</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2000</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0278-2391</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>58</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2000</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparison of labial and crestal incisions for the 1-stage placement of IMZ implants: a pilot study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1119-23; discussion 1123-4</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The aim of this study was to compare the crestal incision with the labial flap design when inserting a 2-stage implant system in a nonsubmerged manner.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PATIENTS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Ten consecutive edentulous patients with a severely resorbed mandible (Cawood Class V to VI) that resulted in reduced stability and insufficient retention of the lower denture were included. In all patients, 2 IMZ implants were inserted in a 1-stage procedure in the mandibular canine regions as part of an implant overdenture treatment. In 5 patients, the labial flap approach was used, and a crestal incision approach was used in the other 5 patients. Standardized evaluations were performed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after implant placement and 12 months after placement of the new prosthesis.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">In the first postoperative weeks, more hyperplasia occurred around the implants inserted by the crestal incision than the labial flap. However, after 1 year of function, no striking differences between the 2 groups were present with regard to the clinical and radiographic parameters.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">From this pilot study, it was concluded that both the crestal incision and the labial flap approach are reliable procedures for insertion of IMZ implants in a 1-stage procedure. However, because of the smaller risk of soft tissue overgrowth, there is a preference for the labial flap approach.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Heydenrijk</LastName><ForeName>K</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands. k.heydenrijk@kchir.azg.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Raghoebar</LastName><ForeName>G M</ForeName><Initials>GM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Batenburg</LastName><ForeName>R H</ForeName><Initials>RH</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stegenga</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8206428</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0278-2391</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>AIM</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000539" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Process</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005889" MajorTopicYN="N">Gingival Recession</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009061" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth Mucosa</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2000</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2000</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>21</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2000</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11021706</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0278-2391(00)41275-9</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1053/joms.2000.9570</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003636 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003636 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:11021706
|texte= A comparison of labial and crestal incisions for the 1-stage placement of IMZ implants: a pilot study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11021706" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |