Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months.
Identifieur interne : 003591 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003590; suivant : 003592Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months.
Auteurs : H F Morris ; S. OchiSource :
- Annals of periodontology [ 1553-0841 ] ; 2000.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biocompatible Materials, Dental Abutments, Dental Alloys, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Durapatite, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Male, Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Survival Analysis, Titanium, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Biocompatible Materials, Dental Alloys, Dental Implants, Durapatite, Titanium.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Abutments, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Stress, Mechanical, Surface Properties, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Numerous new implant designs and materials have become available over the last decade, each with special claims of superiority in restoring complex cases. Differences in existing clinical databases, study designs, and methods of determining failures/survival are seldom standardized, which complicates comparisons of clinical performance of these new designs. Little information is available concerning the changes in stability of various designs and materials following clinical loading.
DOI: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.15
PubMed: 11885174
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11885174Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months.</title><author><name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2000">2000</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11885174</idno><idno type="pmid">11885174</idno><idno type="doi">10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.15</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003591</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003591</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months.</title><author><name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Annals of periodontology</title><idno type="ISSN">1553-0841</idno><imprint><date when="2000" type="published">2000</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Alloys</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Titanium</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Biocompatible Materials</term><term>Dental Alloys</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Abutments</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Numerous new implant designs and materials have become available over the last decade, each with special claims of superiority in restoring complex cases. Differences in existing clinical databases, study designs, and methods of determining failures/survival are seldom standardized, which complicates comparisons of clinical performance of these new designs. Little information is available concerning the changes in stability of various designs and materials following clinical loading.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11885174</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2002</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1553-0841</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>5</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2000</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Annals of periodontology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Ann. Periodontol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>15-21</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Numerous new implant designs and materials have become available over the last decade, each with special claims of superiority in restoring complex cases. Differences in existing clinical databases, study designs, and methods of determining failures/survival are seldom standardized, which complicates comparisons of clinical performance of these new designs. Little information is available concerning the changes in stability of various designs and materials following clinical loading.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">A total of 30 VA medical centers and 2 dental schools combined to form the Dental Implant Clinical Research Group (DICRG). More than 2,900 implants were placed, restored and data gathered from the time of placement to 36 months. Implant stability from uncovering to 36 months and survival from placement to 36 months were determined. Survival was determined using two different approaches--considering all implants removed at any time, regardless of the reason (DICRG approach), and considering only those that were removed following loading of the prosthesis (post-loading approach). Survival was also determined for each of the three phases of implant treatment--phase 1, from the time of placement to uncovering and abutment connection; phase 2, from uncovering to placement and loading of the prosthesis; and phase 3, from loading of the prosthesis to 36 months.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The two approaches to determining survival for each implant design and/or material included in the study showed differences in reported numbers ranging from 1.1% to 21.7%. The largest difference in survival was for the commercially pure titanium screw (used in this study only in the maxillary completely edentulous applications), which showed a 21.7% greater survival rate. With the DICRG approach, the hydroxyapatite (HA)-cylinder had the highest survival (97.5%). When considering the post-loading approach, the titanium-alloy screw had the highest survival (99.4%), with the HA-cylinder having the next highest survival (98.6%). The HA-cylinder did not show increased stability from uncovering to 36 months, and the HA-grooved implant became less stable.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">HA-coated implants demonstrated the highest survival rate; 2) the post-loading analysis approach inflated survival; 3) non-HA implants showed increased stability following loading; 4) HA-coated implants showed a slight decrease or no change in stability; and 5) the clinical significance of the changes in implant stability must be determined for the long-term.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Morris</LastName><ForeName>H F</ForeName><Initials>HF</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ochi</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016448">Multicenter Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Ann Periodontol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9702874</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1553-0841</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D001672">Biocompatible Materials</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D003722">Dental Alloys</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>12743-70-3</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C031462">titanium alloy (TiAl6V4)</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>91D9GV0Z28</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D017886">Durapatite</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>D1JT611TNE</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014025">Titanium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001672" MajorTopicYN="N">Biocompatible Materials</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000044" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Abutments</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003722" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Alloys</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017886" MajorTopicYN="N">Durapatite</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="Y">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014025" MajorTopicYN="N">Titanium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>12</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11885174</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.15</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003591 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003591 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:11885174
|texte= Survival and stability (PTVs) of six implant designs from placement to 36 months.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11885174" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |