A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
Identifieur interne : 003568 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003567; suivant : 003569A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
Auteurs : H F Morris ; S. Winkler ; S. OchiSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 2001.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Restoration Failure, Durapatite, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Middle Aged, Surface Properties, Survival Analysis, Titanium.
- MESH :
- chemical : Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Dental Implants, Durapatite, Titanium.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surface Properties, Survival Analysis.
Abstract
This report is based on a total of 2,955 implants of 6 different designs, randomized and placed in 829 patients and followed for 48 months. Implant failure was defined as nonintegration at uncovering or removal due to mobility, persistent pain, infection, and evidence of radiographic bone loss. Failures were reported for 3 phases of treatment: implant placement to uncovering (phase 1), uncovering to loading (phase 2), and postloading (phase 3). Differences in survival were compared with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The maxillary single tooth application resulted in 95.2% survival for the hydroxyapatite-coated grooved implants. In the maxillary completely edentulous application, survival of hydroxyapatite grooved and screw implants were considerably better compared with the titanium screw implants. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder had better survival than the titanium basket and screw designs in the mandibular completely edentulous application. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder and grooved implants in the maxillary posterior partially edentulous application had similar survival rates. The survival of the hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder exceeded that of the titanium basket in mandibular posterior partially edentulous applications. Analyses by phase of treatment indicated a pattern of early failure for nonhydroxyapatite-coated implants compared with hydroxyapatite-coated implants. The implant with the highest survival at all phases of treatment was the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cylinder. Two hydroxyapatite-coated implant designs performed well in the challenging posterior maxillary region.
DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0180:AMCIID>2.3.CO;2
PubMed: 12500876
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12500876Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.</title><author><name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dental Clinical Research Center and Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dental Research (154), 2215 Fuler Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Winkler, S" sort="Winkler, S" uniqKey="Winkler S" first="S" last="Winkler">S. Winkler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2001">2001</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:12500876</idno><idno type="pmid">12500876</idno><idno type="doi">10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0180:AMCIID>2.3.CO;2</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003568</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003568</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.</title><author><name sortKey="Morris, H F" sort="Morris, H F" uniqKey="Morris H" first="H F" last="Morris">H F Morris</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Dental Clinical Research Center and Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dental Research (154), 2215 Fuler Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Winkler, S" sort="Winkler, S" uniqKey="Winkler S" first="S" last="Winkler">S. Winkler</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ochi, S" sort="Ochi, S" uniqKey="Ochi S" first="S" last="Ochi">S. Ochi</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="2001" type="published">2001</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Durapatite</term><term>Titanium</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Survival Analysis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This report is based on a total of 2,955 implants of 6 different designs, randomized and placed in 829 patients and followed for 48 months. Implant failure was defined as nonintegration at uncovering or removal due to mobility, persistent pain, infection, and evidence of radiographic bone loss. Failures were reported for 3 phases of treatment: implant placement to uncovering (phase 1), uncovering to loading (phase 2), and postloading (phase 3). Differences in survival were compared with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The maxillary single tooth application resulted in 95.2% survival for the hydroxyapatite-coated grooved implants. In the maxillary completely edentulous application, survival of hydroxyapatite grooved and screw implants were considerably better compared with the titanium screw implants. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder had better survival than the titanium basket and screw designs in the mandibular completely edentulous application. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder and grooved implants in the maxillary posterior partially edentulous application had similar survival rates. The survival of the hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder exceeded that of the titanium basket in mandibular posterior partially edentulous applications. Analyses by phase of treatment indicated a pattern of early failure for nonhydroxyapatite-coated implants compared with hydroxyapatite-coated implants. The implant with the highest survival at all phases of treatment was the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cylinder. Two hydroxyapatite-coated implant designs performed well in the challenging posterior maxillary region.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">12500876</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2003</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>03</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0160-6972</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>27</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2001</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>180-6</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>This report is based on a total of 2,955 implants of 6 different designs, randomized and placed in 829 patients and followed for 48 months. Implant failure was defined as nonintegration at uncovering or removal due to mobility, persistent pain, infection, and evidence of radiographic bone loss. Failures were reported for 3 phases of treatment: implant placement to uncovering (phase 1), uncovering to loading (phase 2), and postloading (phase 3). Differences in survival were compared with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The maxillary single tooth application resulted in 95.2% survival for the hydroxyapatite-coated grooved implants. In the maxillary completely edentulous application, survival of hydroxyapatite grooved and screw implants were considerably better compared with the titanium screw implants. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder had better survival than the titanium basket and screw designs in the mandibular completely edentulous application. The hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder and grooved implants in the maxillary posterior partially edentulous application had similar survival rates. The survival of the hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder exceeded that of the titanium basket in mandibular posterior partially edentulous applications. Analyses by phase of treatment indicated a pattern of early failure for nonhydroxyapatite-coated implants compared with hydroxyapatite-coated implants. The implant with the highest survival at all phases of treatment was the hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit cylinder. Two hydroxyapatite-coated implant designs performed well in the challenging posterior maxillary region.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Morris</LastName><ForeName>H F</ForeName><Initials>HF</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Dental Clinical Research Center and Dental Implant Clinical Research Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dental Research (154), 2215 Fuler Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Winkler</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ochi</LastName><ForeName>S</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016448">Multicenter Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013486">Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7801086</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0160-6972</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D020099">Coated Materials, Biocompatible</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>91D9GV0Z28</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D017886">Durapatite</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>D1JT611TNE</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D014025">Titanium</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020099" MajorTopicYN="N">Coated Materials, Biocompatible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017886" MajorTopicYN="N">Durapatite</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014025" MajorTopicYN="N">Titanium</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>4</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2003</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>4</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>4</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12500876</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0180:AMCIID>2.3.CO;2</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003568 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003568 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:12500876
|texte= A 48-month multicentric clinical investigation: implant design and survival.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12500876" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |