Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.
Identifieur interne : 003518 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003517; suivant : 003519Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.
Auteurs : M R Norton ; C. GambleSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2001.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging), Alveolar Process (physiopathology), Bite Force, Bone Density (physiology), Dental Implants, Dental Restoration Failure, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous (physiopathology), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (physiopathology), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (physiopathology), Maxilla (diagnostic imaging), Maxilla (physiopathology), Software, Statistics, Nonparametric, Stress, Mechanical, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Weight-Bearing (physiology).
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Process, Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- physiology : Bone Density, Weight-Bearing.
- physiopathology : Alveolar Process, Jaw, Edentulous, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Bite Force, Dental Restoration Failure, Humans, Software, Statistics, Nonparametric, Stress, Mechanical, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Abstract
Dental implants are subject to masticatory loads of varying magnitude. Implant performance is closely related to load transmission at the bone-to-implant interface where bone quality will be highly variable. The type and architecture of bone is known to influence its load bearing capacity and it has been demonstrated that poorer quality bone is associated with higher failure rates. To date, bone classifications have only provided rough subjective methods for pre-operative assessment, which can prove unreliable. The results of an extensive analysis of computerized tomography scans using Simplant software (Columbia Scientific Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) demonstrate that an objective scale of bone density based on the Houndsfield scale, can be established and that there is a strong correlation between bone density value and subjective quality score (P = 0.002) as well as between the bone density score and the region of the mouth (P < 0.001).
PubMed: 11168274
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:11168274Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.</title><author><name sortKey="Norton, M R" sort="Norton, M R" uniqKey="Norton M" first="M R" last="Norton">M R Norton</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK. nortonimplants@compuserve.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gamble, C" sort="Gamble, C" uniqKey="Gamble C" first="C" last="Gamble">C. Gamble</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2001">2001</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:11168274</idno><idno type="pmid">11168274</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003518</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003518</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.</title><author><name sortKey="Norton, M R" sort="Norton, M R" uniqKey="Norton M" first="M R" last="Norton">M R Norton</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK. nortonimplants@compuserve.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Gamble, C" sort="Gamble, C" uniqKey="Gamble C" first="C" last="Gamble">C. Gamble</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="2001" type="published">2001</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Alveolar Process (physiopathology)</term><term>Bite Force</term><term>Bone Density (physiology)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (physiopathology)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (physiopathology)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (physiopathology)</term><term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxilla (physiopathology)</term><term>Software</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term><term>Weight-Bearing (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Density</term><term>Weight-Bearing</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiopathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Bite Force</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Humans</term><term>Software</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Stress, Mechanical</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Dental implants are subject to masticatory loads of varying magnitude. Implant performance is closely related to load transmission at the bone-to-implant interface where bone quality will be highly variable. The type and architecture of bone is known to influence its load bearing capacity and it has been demonstrated that poorer quality bone is associated with higher failure rates. To date, bone classifications have only provided rough subjective methods for pre-operative assessment, which can prove unreliable. The results of an extensive analysis of computerized tomography scans using Simplant software (Columbia Scientific Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) demonstrate that an objective scale of bone density based on the Houndsfield scale, can be established and that there is a strong correlation between bone density value and subjective quality score (P = 0.002) as well as between the bone density score and the region of the mouth (P < 0.001).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">11168274</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2001</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>29</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>12</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate><Year>2001</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>79-84</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Dental implants are subject to masticatory loads of varying magnitude. Implant performance is closely related to load transmission at the bone-to-implant interface where bone quality will be highly variable. The type and architecture of bone is known to influence its load bearing capacity and it has been demonstrated that poorer quality bone is associated with higher failure rates. To date, bone classifications have only provided rough subjective methods for pre-operative assessment, which can prove unreliable. The results of an extensive analysis of computerized tomography scans using Simplant software (Columbia Scientific Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) demonstrate that an objective scale of bone density based on the Houndsfield scale, can be established and that there is a strong correlation between bone density value and subjective quality score (P = 0.002) as well as between the bone density score and the region of the mouth (P < 0.001).</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Norton</LastName><ForeName>M R</ForeName><Initials>MR</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UK. nortonimplants@compuserve.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Gamble</LastName><ForeName>C</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000539" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Process</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001732" MajorTopicYN="N">Bite Force</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Density</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="N">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000503" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiopathology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012984" MajorTopicYN="N">Software</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013314" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress, Mechanical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="Y">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016474" MajorTopicYN="N">Weight-Bearing</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2001</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2001</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>3</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>1</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2001</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>13</Day><Hour>11</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11168274</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">clr120110</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003518 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003518 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:11168274
|texte= Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:11168274" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |