Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Long-term evaluation of non-submerged hollow cylinder implants. Clinical and radiographic results.

Identifieur interne : 003451 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003450; suivant : 003452

Long-term evaluation of non-submerged hollow cylinder implants. Clinical and radiographic results.

Auteurs : R. Merickse-Stern ; D. Aerni ; A H Geering ; D. Buser

Source :

RBID : pubmed:11359483

English descriptors

Abstract

From 1974 various types of hollow cylinder ITI-implants were placed before the new generation of Bonefit ITI-implants was developed in the mid-eighties. The aim of this study was the clinical and radiographic evaluation of hollow cylinder implants that were inserted during the time period of 1978-1987 in partially and completely edentulous patients to support overdentures, fixed partial prostheses and single crowns. Altogether, 71 patients with a total of 132 hollow cylinder ITI-implants still in situ had been followed regularly during the entire observation period of 11.4 to 19.7 years (mean 14.1). Thirteen implants had to be removed before an observation period of 10 years was completed, 4 additional implants were lost after being in function for over 10 years and two further implants were considered to be failures at the time of the examination. Thus 91.4% of the implants were still in situ after 10 years and the survival rate for a mean observation period of 14.1 years was 84.6%. Periimplant parameters were used to assess the clinical conditions of the implants. On the radiographs, horizontal bone loss or angular defects could be detected on 40% of all implants if compared to the base-line situation. The probing depths around these implants were significantly increased compared to implants with an unchanged bone level, however the mean probing depths did not exceed 3.5 mm and 2.8 mm respectively. From this clinical evaluation one may conclude that with the early generation of hollow cylinder ITI-implants favorable long-term results were achieved.

PubMed: 11359483

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:11359483

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Long-term evaluation of non-submerged hollow cylinder implants. Clinical and radiographic results.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Merickse Stern, R" sort="Merickse Stern, R" uniqKey="Merickse Stern R" first="R" last="Merickse-Stern">R. Merickse-Stern</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland. regina.mericske@zmk.unibe.ch</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Aerni, D" sort="Aerni, D" uniqKey="Aerni D" first="D" last="Aerni">D. Aerni</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Geering, A H" sort="Geering, A H" uniqKey="Geering A" first="A H" last="Geering">A H Geering</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Buser, D" sort="Buser, D" uniqKey="Buser D" first="D" last="Buser">D. Buser</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:11359483</idno>
<idno type="pmid">11359483</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003451</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003451</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Long-term evaluation of non-submerged hollow cylinder implants. Clinical and radiographic results.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Merickse Stern, R" sort="Merickse Stern, R" uniqKey="Merickse Stern R" first="R" last="Merickse-Stern">R. Merickse-Stern</name>
<affiliation>
<nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland. regina.mericske@zmk.unibe.ch</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Aerni, D" sort="Aerni, D" uniqKey="Aerni D" first="D" last="Aerni">D. Aerni</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Geering, A H" sort="Geering, A H" uniqKey="Geering A" first="A H" last="Geering">A H Geering</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Buser, D" sort="Buser, D" uniqKey="Buser D" first="D" last="Buser">D. Buser</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2001" type="published">2001</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Bone Resorption (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Crowns</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term>
<term>Longitudinal Studies</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Mandible (surgery)</term>
<term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Maxilla (surgery)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Periodontal Pocket (classification)</term>
<term>Periodontal Pocket (diagnostic imaging)</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surface Properties</term>
<term>Survival Analysis</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en">
<term>Periodontal Pocket</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en">
<term>Bone Resorption</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Periodontal Pocket</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en">
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Crowns</term>
<term>Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Follow-Up Studies</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Longitudinal Studies</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Radiography</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Surface Properties</term>
<term>Survival Analysis</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">From 1974 various types of hollow cylinder ITI-implants were placed before the new generation of Bonefit ITI-implants was developed in the mid-eighties. The aim of this study was the clinical and radiographic evaluation of hollow cylinder implants that were inserted during the time period of 1978-1987 in partially and completely edentulous patients to support overdentures, fixed partial prostheses and single crowns. Altogether, 71 patients with a total of 132 hollow cylinder ITI-implants still in situ had been followed regularly during the entire observation period of 11.4 to 19.7 years (mean 14.1). Thirteen implants had to be removed before an observation period of 10 years was completed, 4 additional implants were lost after being in function for over 10 years and two further implants were considered to be failures at the time of the examination. Thus 91.4% of the implants were still in situ after 10 years and the survival rate for a mean observation period of 14.1 years was 84.6%. Periimplant parameters were used to assess the clinical conditions of the implants. On the radiographs, horizontal bone loss or angular defects could be detected on 40% of all implants if compared to the base-line situation. The probing depths around these implants were significantly increased compared to implants with an unchanged bone level, however the mean probing depths did not exceed 3.5 mm and 2.8 mm respectively. From this clinical evaluation one may conclude that with the early generation of hollow cylinder ITI-implants favorable long-term results were achieved.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">11359483</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2001</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>12</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2001</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Long-term evaluation of non-submerged hollow cylinder implants. Clinical and radiographic results.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>252-9</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText>From 1974 various types of hollow cylinder ITI-implants were placed before the new generation of Bonefit ITI-implants was developed in the mid-eighties. The aim of this study was the clinical and radiographic evaluation of hollow cylinder implants that were inserted during the time period of 1978-1987 in partially and completely edentulous patients to support overdentures, fixed partial prostheses and single crowns. Altogether, 71 patients with a total of 132 hollow cylinder ITI-implants still in situ had been followed regularly during the entire observation period of 11.4 to 19.7 years (mean 14.1). Thirteen implants had to be removed before an observation period of 10 years was completed, 4 additional implants were lost after being in function for over 10 years and two further implants were considered to be failures at the time of the examination. Thus 91.4% of the implants were still in situ after 10 years and the survival rate for a mean observation period of 14.1 years was 84.6%. Periimplant parameters were used to assess the clinical conditions of the implants. On the radiographs, horizontal bone loss or angular defects could be detected on 40% of all implants if compared to the base-line situation. The probing depths around these implants were significantly increased compared to implants with an unchanged bone level, however the mean probing depths did not exceed 3.5 mm and 2.8 mm respectively. From this clinical evaluation one may conclude that with the early generation of hollow cylinder ITI-implants favorable long-term results were achieved.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Merickse-Stern</LastName>
<ForeName>R</ForeName>
<Initials>R</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo>
<Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland. regina.mericske@zmk.unibe.ch</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Aerni</LastName>
<ForeName>D</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Geering</LastName>
<ForeName>A H</ForeName>
<Initials>AH</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Buser</LastName>
<ForeName>D</ForeName>
<Initials>D</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>Denmark</Country>
<MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList>
<Chemical>
<RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001862" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Resorption</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003442" MajorTopicYN="N">Crowns</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D019250" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants, Single-Tooth</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003830" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Fixed</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008137" MajorTopicYN="N">Longitudinal Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D010514" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Pocket</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="N">classification</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2001</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2001</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2001</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
<Hour>10</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11359483</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">clr120310</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003451 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003451 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:11359483
   |texte=   Long-term evaluation of non-submerged hollow cylinder implants. Clinical and radiographic results.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:11359483" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022