The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.
Identifieur interne : 003279 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003278; suivant : 003280The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.
Auteurs : Yvan Fortin ; Richard M. Sullivan ; Bo R. RangertSource :
- Clinical implant dentistry and related research [ 1523-0899 ] ; 2002.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Resorption (rehabilitation), Bone Resorption (surgery), Clinical Protocols, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Design, Denture Repair, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gingivitis (etiology), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Lip (anatomy & histology), Male, Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Patient Satisfaction, Phonetics, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- anatomy & histology : Lip.
- etiology : Gingivitis.
- rehabilitation : Bone Resorption, Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Bone Resorption, Jaw, Edentulous, Maxilla.
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Protocols, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Design, Denture Repair, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oral Hygiene, Patient Satisfaction, Phonetics, Retrospective Studies, Surface Properties, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
Patients seeking replacement of their upper denture with an implant-supported restoration are most interested in a fixed restoration. Accompanying the loss of supporting alveolar structure due to resorption is the necessity for lip support, often provided by a denture flange. Attempts to provide a fixed restoration can result in compromises to oral hygiene based on designs with ridge laps. An alternative has been an overdenture prosthesis, which provides lip support but has extensions on to the palate and considerations of patient acceptance. The Marius bridge was developed as a fixed bridge alternative offering lip support that is removable by the patient for hygiene purposes, with no palatal extension beyond normal crown-alveolar contours.
PubMed: 12121606
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12121606Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.</title><author><name sortKey="Fortin, Yvan" sort="Fortin, Yvan" uniqKey="Fortin Y" first="Yvan" last="Fortin">Yvan Fortin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre d'Implantologie Dentaire de Quebec, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada. yvan@drfortin.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sullivan, Richard M" sort="Sullivan, Richard M" uniqKey="Sullivan R" first="Richard M" last="Sullivan">Richard M. Sullivan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rangert, Bo R" sort="Rangert, Bo R" uniqKey="Rangert B" first="Bo R" last="Rangert">Bo R. Rangert</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2002">2002</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:12121606</idno><idno type="pmid">12121606</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003279</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003279</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.</title><author><name sortKey="Fortin, Yvan" sort="Fortin, Yvan" uniqKey="Fortin Y" first="Yvan" last="Fortin">Yvan Fortin</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Centre d'Implantologie Dentaire de Quebec, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada. yvan@drfortin.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sullivan, Richard M" sort="Sullivan, Richard M" uniqKey="Sullivan R" first="Richard M" last="Sullivan">Richard M. Sullivan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rangert, Bo R" sort="Rangert, Bo R" uniqKey="Rangert B" first="Bo R" last="Rangert">Bo R. Rangert</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><idno type="ISSN">1523-0899</idno><imprint><date when="2002" type="published">2002</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bone Resorption (rehabilitation)</term><term>Bone Resorption (surgery)</term><term>Clinical Protocols</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture Repair</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Gingivitis (etiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Lip (anatomy & histology)</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oral Hygiene</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Phonetics</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="anatomy & histology" xml:lang="en"><term>Lip</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Gingivitis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Clinical Protocols</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Design</term><term>Denture Repair</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oral Hygiene</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Phonetics</term><term>Retrospective Studies</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Patients seeking replacement of their upper denture with an implant-supported restoration are most interested in a fixed restoration. Accompanying the loss of supporting alveolar structure due to resorption is the necessity for lip support, often provided by a denture flange. Attempts to provide a fixed restoration can result in compromises to oral hygiene based on designs with ridge laps. An alternative has been an overdenture prosthesis, which provides lip support but has extensions on to the palate and considerations of patient acceptance. The Marius bridge was developed as a fixed bridge alternative offering lip support that is removable by the patient for hygiene purposes, with no palatal extension beyond normal crown-alveolar contours.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">12121606</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2002</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1523-0899</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>4</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2002</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>69-77</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Patients seeking replacement of their upper denture with an implant-supported restoration are most interested in a fixed restoration. Accompanying the loss of supporting alveolar structure due to resorption is the necessity for lip support, often provided by a denture flange. Attempts to provide a fixed restoration can result in compromises to oral hygiene based on designs with ridge laps. An alternative has been an overdenture prosthesis, which provides lip support but has extensions on to the palate and considerations of patient acceptance. The Marius bridge was developed as a fixed bridge alternative offering lip support that is removable by the patient for hygiene purposes, with no palatal extension beyond normal crown-alveolar contours.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Implant-supported restorative treatment of completely edentulous upper jaws, as an alternative to a complete denture, is frequently an elective preference, and it requires significant patient acceptance beyond the functional improvement of chewing. Patients with moderate to severe bone resorption and thin ridges present additional challenges for adequate bone volume and soft-tissue contours. The purpose of this investigation was to develop a surgical and prosthetic implant treatment protocol for completely edentulous maxillae in which optimal lip support and phonetics is achieved in combination with substantial implant anchorage without bone grafting.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The Marius bridge is a complete-arch, double-structure prosthesis for maxillae that is removable by the patient for oral hygiene. The first 45 consecutive patients treated by one person (YF) in one center with this concept are reported, with 245 implants followed for up to 5 years after prostheses connection.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The cumulative fixture survival rate for this 5-year retrospective clinical study was 97%. Five fixtures failed before loading, in five different patients, and two fixtures in the same patient failed at the 3-year follow-up visit. None of the bridges failed, giving a prostheses survival rate of 100%. The complications were few and mainly prosthetic: nine incidences of attachment component complications, one mesobar fracture, and three reports of gingivitis. All complications were solved or repaired immediately, with minimal or no interruption of prostheses use.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Satisfactory medium-term results of survival and patient satisfaction show that the Marius bridge can be recommended for implant dentistry. The technique may reduce the need for grafting, because it allows for longer implants to be placed with improved bone anchorage and prostheses support. key words: clinical follow-up, complete arch, double structure, esthetics, maxilla, phonetics, tilted implants</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Fortin</LastName><ForeName>Yvan</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Centre d'Implantologie Dentaire de Quebec, Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada. yvan@drfortin.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sullivan</LastName><ForeName>Richard M</ForeName><Initials>RM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rangert</LastName><ForeName>Bo R</ForeName><Initials>BR</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100888977</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1523-0899</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001862" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Resorption</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002985" MajorTopicYN="N">Clinical Protocols</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003779" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003780" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Repair</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005891" MajorTopicYN="N">Gingivitis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008046" MajorTopicYN="N">Lip</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000033" MajorTopicYN="N">anatomy & histology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009910" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Hygiene</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010700" MajorTopicYN="N">Phonetics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012189" MajorTopicYN="N">Retrospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>26</Day><Hour>4</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12121606</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003279 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003279 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:12121606
|texte= The Marius implant bridge: surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation for the completely edentulous upper jaw with moderate to severe resorption: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12121606" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |