Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.
Identifieur interne : 003153 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003152; suivant : 003154Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.
Auteurs : Ignace Naert ; George Koutsikakis ; Joke Duyck ; Marc Quirynen ; Reinhilde Jacobs ; Daniel Van SteenbergheSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2002.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acrylic Resins, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Transplantation, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), Crowns, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Veneers, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery), Life Tables, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mandible (surgery), Maxilla (surgery), Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical : Acrylic Resins, Dental Implants.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Mandible, Maxilla.
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bone Transplantation, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), Crowns, Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Dental Veneers, Denture, Partial, Fixed, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Tables, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Osseointegration, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk Factors, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free-standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant-tooth connected and free-standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior-posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic-veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.
PubMed: 12175375
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12175375Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium. Ignace.Naert@med.kuleuven.ac.be</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koutsikakis, George" sort="Koutsikakis, George" uniqKey="Koutsikakis G" first="George" last="Koutsikakis">George Koutsikakis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" sort="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="Daniel" last="Van Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2002">2002</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:12175375</idno><idno type="pmid">12175375</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003153</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003153</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.</title><author><name sortKey="Naert, Ignace" sort="Naert, Ignace" uniqKey="Naert I" first="Ignace" last="Naert">Ignace Naert</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium. Ignace.Naert@med.kuleuven.ac.be</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Koutsikakis, George" sort="Koutsikakis, George" uniqKey="Koutsikakis G" first="George" last="Koutsikakis">George Koutsikakis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Duyck, Joke" sort="Duyck, Joke" uniqKey="Duyck J" first="Joke" last="Duyck">Joke Duyck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Quirynen, Marc" sort="Quirynen, Marc" uniqKey="Quirynen M" first="Marc" last="Quirynen">Marc Quirynen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jacobs, Reinhilde" sort="Jacobs, Reinhilde" uniqKey="Jacobs R" first="Reinhilde" last="Jacobs">Reinhilde Jacobs</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" sort="Van Steenberghe, Daniel" uniqKey="Van Steenberghe D" first="Daniel" last="Van Steenberghe">Daniel Van Steenberghe</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="2002" type="published">2002</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Dental Veneers</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (surgery)</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Maxilla (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Proportional Hazards Models</term><term>Risk Factors</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic Resins</term><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</term><term>Crowns</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Dental Veneers</term><term>Denture, Partial, Fixed</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Life Tables</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Proportional Hazards Models</term><term>Risk Factors</term><term>Survival Analysis</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free-standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant-tooth connected and free-standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior-posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic-veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">12175375</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2002</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2004</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>13</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2002</Year><Month>Aug</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>381-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The purpose of this study was to predict the outcome of implant restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism, taking into account implant interdependency and the effect of several confounding variables. Between December 1982 and June 1998, 1956 Brånemark system implants (1212 and 744 in the maxilla and mandible, respectively, 846 distal to first premolars) were installed in 660 patients (248 males) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospitals of the Catholic University of Leuven. Of the 810 restorations installed at the Department of Prosthetic Dentistry of the same hospital, 235 were single crowns, 166 were supported by implants and teeth and 409 were free-standing fixed partial prostheses. An additional 87 restorations was placed in private dental offices and were not included. The patients were followed from implant installation until June 1999. The estimated cumulative survival rates were 91.4% for all implants and 95.8% for all restorations over a period of 16 years. Estimated cumulative survival rates from loading for implant-tooth connected and free-standing implants were, respectively, 93.6% and 97.2%. Neither jaw site nor implant position (anterior-posterior) had any significant effect on the outcome. Short implant length, high number of implants per patient, low number of implants per prosthesis, implants loaded by acrylic-veneered restorations and implants combined with bone grafting present a higher risk hazard for implant failure. The idea of not splinting the implants in a fixed partial prosthesis is promising but needs replication before accepting it.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Naert</LastName><ForeName>Ignace</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium. Ignace.Naert@med.kuleuven.ac.be</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Koutsikakis</LastName><ForeName>George</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Duyck</LastName><ForeName>Joke</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Quirynen</LastName><ForeName>Marc</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jacobs</LastName><ForeName>Reinhilde</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Steenberghe</LastName><ForeName>Daniel</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000180">Acrylic Resins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000180" MajorTopicYN="N">Acrylic Resins</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015986" MajorTopicYN="N">Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003442" MajorTopicYN="N">Crowns</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003801" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Veneers</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003830" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Partial, Fixed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015993" MajorTopicYN="N">Life Tables</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008137" MajorTopicYN="N">Longitudinal Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="N">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016016" MajorTopicYN="N">Proportional Hazards Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012307" MajorTopicYN="N">Risk Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>4</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>10</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12175375</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">clr130406</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003153 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003153 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:12175375
|texte= Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. part I: a longitudinal clinical evaluation.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12175375" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |