Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implant-supported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction.
Identifieur interne : 003146 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 003145; suivant : 003147Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implant-supported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction.
Auteurs : Cuneyt Karabuda ; Tosun Tosun ; Evren Ermis ; Tayfun OzdemirSource :
- Journal of periodontology [ 0022-3492 ] ; 2002.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Plaque Index, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Precision Attachment, Denture Retention (instrumentation), Denture Retention (psychology), Denture, Overlay, Female, Gingiva (physiology), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Mandible, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Statistics, Nonparametric, Wound Healing.
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Denture Retention.
- physiology : Gingiva.
- psychology : Denture Retention.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Adult, Aged, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Plaque Index, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Precision Attachment, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Male, Mandible, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Periodontal Index, Statistics, Nonparametric, Wound Healing.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare the peri-implant soft tissue health status of implants supporting overdentures with bar attachments or ball attachments in the mandible, as well as patient satisfaction with these attachment types.
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.9.1067
PubMed: 12296593
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12296593Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implant-supported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Karabuda, Cuneyt" sort="Karabuda, Cuneyt" uniqKey="Karabuda C" first="Cuneyt" last="Karabuda">Cuneyt Karabuda</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Turkey. zcuneyt@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tosun, Tosun" sort="Tosun, Tosun" uniqKey="Tosun T" first="Tosun" last="Tosun">Tosun Tosun</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ermis, Evren" sort="Ermis, Evren" uniqKey="Ermis E" first="Evren" last="Ermis">Evren Ermis</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ozdemir, Tayfun" sort="Ozdemir, Tayfun" uniqKey="Ozdemir T" first="Tayfun" last="Ozdemir">Tayfun Ozdemir</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:12296593</idno>
<idno type="pmid">12296593</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1902/jop.2002.73.9.1067</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">003146</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">003146</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implant-supported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Karabuda, Cuneyt" sort="Karabuda, Cuneyt" uniqKey="Karabuda C" first="Cuneyt" last="Karabuda">Cuneyt Karabuda</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Turkey. zcuneyt@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Tosun, Tosun" sort="Tosun, Tosun" uniqKey="Tosun T" first="Tosun" last="Tosun">Tosun Tosun</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ermis, Evren" sort="Ermis, Evren" uniqKey="Ermis E" first="Evren" last="Ermis">Evren Ermis</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ozdemir, Tayfun" sort="Ozdemir, Tayfun" uniqKey="Ozdemir T" first="Tayfun" last="Ozdemir">Tayfun Ozdemir</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of periodontology</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3492</idno>
<imprint><date when="2002" type="published">2002</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Plaque Index</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture Precision Attachment</term>
<term>Denture Retention (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Denture Retention (psychology)</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Gingiva (physiology)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Periodontal Index</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Wound Healing</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Gingiva</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Aged</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Plaque Index</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture Precision Attachment</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Mandible</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Periodontal Index</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Wound Healing</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of the present study was to compare the peri-implant soft tissue health status of implants supporting overdentures with bar attachments or ball attachments in the mandible, as well as patient satisfaction with these attachment types.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">12296593</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2004</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-3492</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>73</Volume>
<Issue>9</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>Sep</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of periodontology</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J. Periodontol.</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implant-supported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1067-70</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">The aim of the present study was to compare the peri-implant soft tissue health status of implants supporting overdentures with bar attachments or ball attachments in the mandible, as well as patient satisfaction with these attachment types.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The study included a Dolder bar group with 18 cases (43 implants) and a ball attachment group with 18 cases (51 implants). The mean function period in the Dolder bar group was 49 months (range: 12 to 72 months) and in the ball attachment group, the mean was 23 months (range: 12 to 40 months). Implants were clinically evaluated by using a modified plaque index (mPI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), and probing depths. Patient satisfaction with the treatment was recorded using a questionnaire.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">mPI, probing depth, and mSBI did not statistically differ between groups (Mann-Whitney U test, P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction was similar with both retentive systems.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Within the limits of this study, we concluded that there was no significant difference between the 2 attachment types used for implant-supported overdentures with respect to the soft tissue health status or patient satisfaction.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Karabuda</LastName>
<ForeName>Cuneyt</ForeName>
<Initials>C</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, Turkey. zcuneyt@hotmail.com</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tosun</LastName>
<ForeName>Tosun</ForeName>
<Initials>T</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ermis</LastName>
<ForeName>Evren</ForeName>
<Initials>E</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ozdemir</LastName>
<ForeName>Tayfun</ForeName>
<Initials>T</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Periodontol</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8000345</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0022-3492</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003774" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Plaque Index</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003834" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Precision Attachment</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005881" MajorTopicYN="N">Gingiva</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010512" MajorTopicYN="N">Periodontal Index</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014945" MajorTopicYN="N">Wound Healing</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
<Hour>4</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2002</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>26</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12296593</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1902/jop.2002.73.9.1067</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003146 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003146 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:12296593 |texte= Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implant-supported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12296593" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |