Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study.
Identifieur interne : 002F35 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002F34; suivant : 002F36Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study.
Auteurs : Kees Stellingsma ; Jelte Bouma ; Boudewijn Stegenga ; Henny J A. Meijer ; Gerry M. RaghoebarSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 0905-7161 ] ; 2003.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Analysis of Variance, Attitude to Health, Bone Resorption (pathology), Bone Resorption (surgery), Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants (psychology), Dental Prosthesis Design, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (psychology), Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (pathology), Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Statistics, Nonparametric.
- MESH :
- chemical , psychology : Dental Implants.
- pathology : Bone Resorption, Mandible.
- psychology : Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Bone Resorption, Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Analysis of Variance, Attitude to Health, Bone Transplantation, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis Design, Denture Retention, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Statistics, Nonparametric.
Abstract
The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (+/- SD) age 59 (+/- 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1-year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.
PubMed: 12656875
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12656875Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Stellingsma, Kees" sort="Stellingsma, Kees" uniqKey="Stellingsma K" first="Kees" last="Stellingsma">Kees Stellingsma</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.stellingsma@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouma, Jelte" sort="Bouma, Jelte" uniqKey="Bouma J" first="Jelte" last="Bouma">Jelte Bouma</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J A" last="Meijer">Henny J A. Meijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M" last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2003">2003</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:12656875</idno><idno type="pmid">12656875</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002F35</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002F35</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study.</title><author><name sortKey="Stellingsma, Kees" sort="Stellingsma, Kees" uniqKey="Stellingsma K" first="Kees" last="Stellingsma">Kees Stellingsma</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.stellingsma@kchir.azg.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bouma, Jelte" sort="Bouma, Jelte" uniqKey="Bouma J" first="Jelte" last="Bouma">Jelte Bouma</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, Boudewijn" sort="Stegenga, Boudewijn" uniqKey="Stegenga B" first="Boudewijn" last="Stegenga">Boudewijn Stegenga</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J A" last="Meijer">Henny J A. Meijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M" last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="ISSN">0905-7161</idno><imprint><date when="2003" type="published">2003</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Bone Resorption (pathology)</term><term>Bone Resorption (surgery)</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants (psychology)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (psychology)</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (pathology)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Resorption</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term><term>Analysis of Variance</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Bone Transplantation</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (+/- SD) age 59 (+/- 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1-year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">12656875</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2003</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0905-7161</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>14</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2003</Year><Month>Apr</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>166-72</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The objective of the present report was to study the effect of implant treatment on subjective parameters in edentulous patients with an extremely resorbed mandible. Three different treatment modalities to support an overdenture were compared: transmandibular implant according to Bosker, augmentation of the mandible followed by four endosseous implants, and the insertion of four short endosseous implants. Sixty patients [50 women and 10 men, mean (+/- SD) age 59 (+/- 11) years] met the inclusion criteria and were assigned in one of the three treatment groups. Before treatment and 12 months after placement of the new overdentures, denture satisfaction, psychosocial aspects and experiences during the surgical phase were assessed with a battery of questionnaires. After 1 year, 58 patients were available for evaluation: one patient had died, and one patient had moved out of the region. There was a significant improvement of patient satisfaction and psychosocial functioning in all three treatment groups. At the 1-year evaluation, differences amongst the three groups were not significant. However, in terms of discomfort and pain during the surgical phase as well as the length of this phase (at least 6 months), the augmentation using an autologous bone graft from the iliac crest followed by inserting four endosseous implants 3 months later appeared the least favorite option of the three modalities studied.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stellingsma</LastName><ForeName>Kees</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands. c.stellingsma@kchir.azg.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bouma</LastName><ForeName>Jelte</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stegenga</LastName><ForeName>Boudewijn</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Meijer</LastName><ForeName>Henny J A</ForeName><Initials>HJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Raghoebar</LastName><ForeName>Gerry M</ForeName><Initials>GM</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016430">Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D018848">Controlled Clinical Trial</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000704" MajorTopicYN="N">Analysis of Variance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001294" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attitude to Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001862" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Resorption</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011183" MajorTopicYN="N">Postoperative Complications</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="N">Quality of Life</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2003</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2003</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2003</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12656875</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">clr140205</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002F35 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002F35 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:12656875
|texte= Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12656875" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |