Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Identifieur interne : 002E79 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002E78; suivant : 002E80Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Auteurs : David P. Sarment ; Predrag Sukovic ; Neal ClinthorneSource :
- The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants [ 0882-2786 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Computer-Aided Design, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation), Dental Implants, Epoxy Resins, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Models, Anatomic, Osteotomy, Patient Care Planning, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants, Epoxy Resins.
- diagnostic imaging : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- instrumentation : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Computer-Aided Design, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Models, Anatomic, Osteotomy, Patient Care Planning, Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Abstract
Placement of dental implants requires precise planning that accounts for anatomic limitations and restorative goals. Diagnosis can be made with the assistance of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning, but transfer of planning to the surgical field is limited. Recently, novel CAD/CAM techniques such as stereolithographic rapid prototyping have been developed to build surgical guides in an attempt to improve precision of implant placement. However, comparison of these advanced techniques to traditional surgical guides has not been performed. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of a conventional surgical guide to that of a stereolithographic surgical guide.
PubMed: 12939011
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:12939011Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.</title><author><name sortKey="Sarment, David P" sort="Sarment, David P" uniqKey="Sarment D" first="David P" last="Sarment">David P. Sarment</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, Center for Biorestoration of Oral Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USA. sarment@umich.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sukovic, Predrag" sort="Sukovic, Predrag" uniqKey="Sukovic P" first="Predrag" last="Sukovic">Predrag Sukovic</name></author><author><name sortKey="Clinthorne, Neal" sort="Clinthorne, Neal" uniqKey="Clinthorne N" first="Neal" last="Clinthorne">Neal Clinthorne</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2003 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:12939011</idno><idno type="pmid">12939011</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002E79</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002E79</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.</title><author><name sortKey="Sarment, David P" sort="Sarment, David P" uniqKey="Sarment D" first="David P" last="Sarment">David P. Sarment</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, Center for Biorestoration of Oral Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USA. sarment@umich.edu</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sukovic, Predrag" sort="Sukovic, Predrag" uniqKey="Sukovic P" first="Predrag" last="Sukovic">Predrag Sukovic</name></author><author><name sortKey="Clinthorne, Neal" sort="Clinthorne, Neal" uniqKey="Clinthorne N" first="Neal" last="Clinthorne">Neal Clinthorne</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</title><idno type="ISSN">0882-2786</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Epoxy Resins</term><term>Humans</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Osteotomy</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Epoxy Resins</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer-Aided Design</term><term>Humans</term><term>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Osteotomy</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Placement of dental implants requires precise planning that accounts for anatomic limitations and restorative goals. Diagnosis can be made with the assistance of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning, but transfer of planning to the surgical field is limited. Recently, novel CAD/CAM techniques such as stereolithographic rapid prototyping have been developed to build surgical guides in an attempt to improve precision of implant placement. However, comparison of these advanced techniques to traditional surgical guides has not been performed. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of a conventional surgical guide to that of a stereolithographic surgical guide.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">12939011</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2003</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>24</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0882-2786</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>18</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2003 Jul-Aug</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>571-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Placement of dental implants requires precise planning that accounts for anatomic limitations and restorative goals. Diagnosis can be made with the assistance of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning, but transfer of planning to the surgical field is limited. Recently, novel CAD/CAM techniques such as stereolithographic rapid prototyping have been developed to build surgical guides in an attempt to improve precision of implant placement. However, comparison of these advanced techniques to traditional surgical guides has not been performed. The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy of a conventional surgical guide to that of a stereolithographic surgical guide.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">CT scanning of epoxy edentulous mandibles was performed using a cone beam CT scanner with high isotropic spatial resolution, while planning for 5 implants on each side of the jaw was performed using a commercially available software package. Five surgeons performed osteotomies on a jaw identical to the initial model; on the right side a conventional surgical guide (control side) was used, and on the left side a stereolithographic guide was used (test side). Each jaw was then CT scanned, and a registration method was applied to match it to the initial planning. Measurements included distances between planned implants and actual osteotomies.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">The average distance between the planned implant and the actual osteotomy was 1.5 mm at the entrance and 2.1 mm at the apex when the control guide was used. The same measurements were significantly reduced to 0.9 mm and 1.0 mm when the test guide was used. Variations were also reduced with the test guide, within surgeons and between surgeons.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="DISCUSSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Surgical guidance for implant placement relieves the clinician from multiple perioperative decisions. Precise implant placement is under investigation using sophisticated guidance methods, including CAD/CAM templates.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Within the limits of this study, implant placement was improved by using a stereolithographic surgical guide.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sarment</LastName><ForeName>David P</ForeName><Initials>DP</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, Center for Biorestoration of Oral Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USA. sarment@umich.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sukovic</LastName><ForeName>Predrag</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Clinthorne</LastName><ForeName>Neal</ForeName><Initials>N</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8611905</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0882-2786</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D004853">Epoxy Resins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017076" MajorTopicYN="Y">Computer-Aided Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004853" MajorTopicYN="N">Epoxy Resins</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007091" MajorTopicYN="N">Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008953" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Anatomic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010027" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteotomy</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014057" MajorTopicYN="N">Tomography, X-Ray Computed</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2003</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2003</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2003</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12939011</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E79 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002E79 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:12939011
|texte= Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:12939011" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |