The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Identifieur interne : 002910 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002909; suivant : 002911The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
Auteurs : A U Güler ; M. Sumer ; P. Sumer ; I. BiçerSource :
- Journal of oral rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2005.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging), Bicuspid, Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging), Male, Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Maxilla (diagnostic imaging), Maxillary Sinus (diagnostic imaging), Middle Aged, Molar, Radiography, Panoramic (methods), Sex Factors.
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Alveolar Process, Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible, Maxilla, Maxillary Sinus.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Radiography, Panoramic.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bicuspid, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Molar, Sex Factors.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine variations in the vertical height measurements in the edentulous maxilla and mandible, and to assess positions of the maxillary sinus, mandibular foramen, and the mandibular canal, which are important for implant length selection and planning using panoramic radiographs. The study sample included 346 edentulous alveolar ridges of 90 men and 83 women. Sixty-three dentate patients' panoramic radiographs were used for location of the first premolar and molar area. Panoramic radiographs were made with a Siemens Orthophos panoramic machine which had been standardized previously. All radiographs were made using a standardized manner by the same technician. Fourteen sites were measured on every panoramic radiograph whenever possible, eight sites in the maxilla and six sites in the mandible. Correlation analyses were performed between age groups and all measurements to determine if age is significant as a covariate. In order to examine the effect of gender the statistical analysis of differences between men and women was performed with Student t-test. The 5% significance level was used for statistical significancy. The height of the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior, first premolar, and first molar regions were significantly greater in men than in women. A majority of the most inferior border of the maxillary sinuses was located anterior to the first molar area (premolar regions) both in men (48.9%) and women (55.4%). Although, there was no statistically significant difference between edentulous men and women for the vertical distances from the mental foramen to the alveolar crest, and horizontal distances from mental foramen to midline, there were statistically significant differences between edentulous men and edentulous women for the vertical distances from the upper border of the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest in the first molar area. Mental foramens were located at the crest of the ridge in 7.2% of the edentulous women, and 6.7% of the edentulous men. The results of this study may guide clinicians to make primer decision of implant insertion area for implant supported prosthesis in edentulous patients.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01499.x
PubMed: 16159352
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16159352Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.</title><author><name sortKey="Guler, A U" sort="Guler, A U" uniqKey="Guler A" first="A U" last="Güler">A U Güler</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayls University, Samsun, Turkey. auguler@omu.edu.tr</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sumer, M" sort="Sumer, M" uniqKey="Sumer M" first="M" last="Sumer">M. Sumer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sumer, P" sort="Sumer, P" uniqKey="Sumer P" first="P" last="Sumer">P. Sumer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bicer, I" sort="Bicer, I" uniqKey="Bicer I" first="I" last="Biçer">I. Biçer</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2005">2005</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16159352</idno><idno type="pmid">16159352</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01499.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002910</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002910</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.</title><author><name sortKey="Guler, A U" sort="Guler, A U" uniqKey="Guler A" first="A U" last="Güler">A U Güler</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayls University, Samsun, Turkey. auguler@omu.edu.tr</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Sumer, M" sort="Sumer, M" uniqKey="Sumer M" first="M" last="Sumer">M. Sumer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sumer, P" sort="Sumer, P" uniqKey="Sumer P" first="P" last="Sumer">P. Sumer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bicer, I" sort="Bicer, I" uniqKey="Bicer I" first="I" last="Biçer">I. Biçer</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><imprint><date when="2005" type="published">2005</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Alveolar Process (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Bicuspid</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxilla (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Maxillary Sinus (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Molar</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic (methods)</term><term>Sex Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Process</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Maxillary Sinus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Radiography, Panoramic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Bicuspid</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Molar</term><term>Sex Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study was to determine variations in the vertical height measurements in the edentulous maxilla and mandible, and to assess positions of the maxillary sinus, mandibular foramen, and the mandibular canal, which are important for implant length selection and planning using panoramic radiographs. The study sample included 346 edentulous alveolar ridges of 90 men and 83 women. Sixty-three dentate patients' panoramic radiographs were used for location of the first premolar and molar area. Panoramic radiographs were made with a Siemens Orthophos panoramic machine which had been standardized previously. All radiographs were made using a standardized manner by the same technician. Fourteen sites were measured on every panoramic radiograph whenever possible, eight sites in the maxilla and six sites in the mandible. Correlation analyses were performed between age groups and all measurements to determine if age is significant as a covariate. In order to examine the effect of gender the statistical analysis of differences between men and women was performed with Student t-test. The 5% significance level was used for statistical significancy. The height of the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior, first premolar, and first molar regions were significantly greater in men than in women. A majority of the most inferior border of the maxillary sinuses was located anterior to the first molar area (premolar regions) both in men (48.9%) and women (55.4%). Although, there was no statistically significant difference between edentulous men and women for the vertical distances from the mental foramen to the alveolar crest, and horizontal distances from mental foramen to midline, there were statistically significant differences between edentulous men and edentulous women for the vertical distances from the upper border of the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest in the first molar area. Mental foramens were located at the crest of the ridge in 7.2% of the edentulous women, and 6.7% of the edentulous men. The results of this study may guide clinicians to make primer decision of implant insertion area for implant supported prosthesis in edentulous patients.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16159352</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>24</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0305-182X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>32</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2005</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>741-6</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The purpose of this study was to determine variations in the vertical height measurements in the edentulous maxilla and mandible, and to assess positions of the maxillary sinus, mandibular foramen, and the mandibular canal, which are important for implant length selection and planning using panoramic radiographs. The study sample included 346 edentulous alveolar ridges of 90 men and 83 women. Sixty-three dentate patients' panoramic radiographs were used for location of the first premolar and molar area. Panoramic radiographs were made with a Siemens Orthophos panoramic machine which had been standardized previously. All radiographs were made using a standardized manner by the same technician. Fourteen sites were measured on every panoramic radiograph whenever possible, eight sites in the maxilla and six sites in the mandible. Correlation analyses were performed between age groups and all measurements to determine if age is significant as a covariate. In order to examine the effect of gender the statistical analysis of differences between men and women was performed with Student t-test. The 5% significance level was used for statistical significancy. The height of the maxilla and the mandible in the anterior, first premolar, and first molar regions were significantly greater in men than in women. A majority of the most inferior border of the maxillary sinuses was located anterior to the first molar area (premolar regions) both in men (48.9%) and women (55.4%). Although, there was no statistically significant difference between edentulous men and women for the vertical distances from the mental foramen to the alveolar crest, and horizontal distances from mental foramen to midline, there were statistically significant differences between edentulous men and edentulous women for the vertical distances from the upper border of the mandibular canal to the alveolar crest in the first molar area. Mental foramens were located at the crest of the ridge in 7.2% of the edentulous women, and 6.7% of the edentulous men. The results of this study may guide clinicians to make primer decision of implant insertion area for implant supported prosthesis in edentulous patients.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Güler</LastName><ForeName>A U</ForeName><Initials>AU</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayls University, Samsun, Turkey. auguler@omu.edu.tr</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sumer</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sumer</LastName><ForeName>P</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Biçer</LastName><ForeName>I</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Rehabil</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0433604</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0305-182X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000539" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Process</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001641" MajorTopicYN="N">Bicuspid</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008443" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxillary Sinus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008963" MajorTopicYN="N">Molar</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011862" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography, Panoramic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012737" MajorTopicYN="N">Sex Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2005</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2005</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16159352</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">JOR1499</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01499.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002910 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002910 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16159352
|texte= The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16159352" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |