[Patient satisfaction with removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible].
Identifieur interne : 002853 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002852; suivant : 002854[Patient satisfaction with removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible].
Auteurs : Nicola U. Zitzmann ; Carlo P. MarinelloSource :
- Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia [ 0256-2855 ] ; 2006.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (psychology), Denture, Complete, Lower (psychology), Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (psychology), Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Mastication, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Regression Analysis, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survival Analysis.
- MESH :
- psychology : Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture, Complete, Lower, Jaw, Edentulous.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Prosthesis Retention, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mastication, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Regression Analysis, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surveys and Questionnaires, Survival Analysis.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate patients' satisfaction with removable implant restorations with two or four implants compared to a complete denture (CD) in the edentulous mandible. 20 patients in each group were asked to fill out a questionnaire ("Patient satisfaction related to the prosthetic restoration") before treatment, after six months and three years. With implant restorations, either implant-retained (IRET) or implant-supported (ISUP), greater improvements in prostheses retention and pain reduction were achieved in comparison to complete dentures. In addition, restrictions related to food selection were resolved for most implant patients. Despite great inter-individual differences, there was a tendency for larger improvements of almost all parameters with IRET, except chewing ability, which was rated best with ISUP. Long-term results revealed that patients with ISUP (four implants) assessed prostheses retention with the highest ratings compared to those with IRET and CD (p = 0,0147). These results indicate that an improvement in functional and psychological parameters can be achieved with two implants, whilst stabilization with four implants improves prosthesis retention, chewing ability and pain reduction in the long term. Maintenance efforts were more complex for implant restorations than for CD and imply a recall at least once a year.
PubMed: 16610459
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16610459Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Patient satisfaction with removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Zitzmann, Nicola U" sort="Zitzmann, Nicola U" uniqKey="Zitzmann N" first="Nicola U" last="Zitzmann">Nicola U. Zitzmann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Klinik für Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin und Myoarthropathien, Universitätskliniken für Zahnmedizin, Universität Basel. n.zitzmann@unibas.ch</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marinello, Carlo P" sort="Marinello, Carlo P" uniqKey="Marinello C" first="Carlo P" last="Marinello">Carlo P. Marinello</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16610459</idno><idno type="pmid">16610459</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002853</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002853</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Patient satisfaction with removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible].</title><author><name sortKey="Zitzmann, Nicola U" sort="Zitzmann, Nicola U" uniqKey="Zitzmann N" first="Nicola U" last="Zitzmann">Nicola U. Zitzmann</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Klinik für Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin und Myoarthropathien, Universitätskliniken für Zahnmedizin, Universität Basel. n.zitzmann@unibas.ch</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Marinello, Carlo P" sort="Marinello, Carlo P" uniqKey="Marinello C" first="Carlo P" last="Marinello">Carlo P. Marinello</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia</title><idno type="ISSN">0256-2855</idno><imprint><date when="2006" type="published">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adaptation, Psychological</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (psychology)</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower (psychology)</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (psychology)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mastication</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Survival Analysis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adaptation, Psychological</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Retention</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Mastication</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Regression Analysis</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Survival Analysis</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of the present study was to investigate patients' satisfaction with removable implant restorations with two or four implants compared to a complete denture (CD) in the edentulous mandible. 20 patients in each group were asked to fill out a questionnaire ("Patient satisfaction related to the prosthetic restoration") before treatment, after six months and three years. With implant restorations, either implant-retained (IRET) or implant-supported (ISUP), greater improvements in prostheses retention and pain reduction were achieved in comparison to complete dentures. In addition, restrictions related to food selection were resolved for most implant patients. Despite great inter-individual differences, there was a tendency for larger improvements of almost all parameters with IRET, except chewing ability, which was rated best with ISUP. Long-term results revealed that patients with ISUP (four implants) assessed prostheses retention with the highest ratings compared to those with IRET and CD (p = 0,0147). These results indicate that an improvement in functional and psychological parameters can be achieved with two implants, whilst stabilization with four implants improves prosthesis retention, chewing ability and pain reduction in the long term. Maintenance efforts were more complex for implant restorations than for CD and imply a recall at least once a year.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16610459</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>22</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0256-2855</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>116</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2006</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Patient satisfaction with removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>237-44</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim of the present study was to investigate patients' satisfaction with removable implant restorations with two or four implants compared to a complete denture (CD) in the edentulous mandible. 20 patients in each group were asked to fill out a questionnaire ("Patient satisfaction related to the prosthetic restoration") before treatment, after six months and three years. With implant restorations, either implant-retained (IRET) or implant-supported (ISUP), greater improvements in prostheses retention and pain reduction were achieved in comparison to complete dentures. In addition, restrictions related to food selection were resolved for most implant patients. Despite great inter-individual differences, there was a tendency for larger improvements of almost all parameters with IRET, except chewing ability, which was rated best with ISUP. Long-term results revealed that patients with ISUP (four implants) assessed prostheses retention with the highest ratings compared to those with IRET and CD (p = 0,0147). These results indicate that an improvement in functional and psychological parameters can be achieved with two implants, whilst stabilization with four implants improves prosthesis retention, chewing ability and pain reduction in the long term. Maintenance efforts were more complex for implant restorations than for CD and imply a recall at least once a year.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zitzmann</LastName><ForeName>Nicola U</ForeName><Initials>NU</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Klinik für Rekonstruktive Zahnmedizin und Myoarthropathien, Universitätskliniken für Zahnmedizin, Universität Basel. n.zitzmann@unibas.ch</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Marinello</LastName><ForeName>Carlo P</ForeName><Initials>CP</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>ger</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D004740">English Abstract</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Patientenzufriedenheit mit abnehmbaren Implantat- Rekonstruktionen im zahnlosen Unterkiefer.</VernacularTitle></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Switzerland</Country><MedlineTA>Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8709597</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0256-2855</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000223" MajorTopicYN="N">Adaptation, Psychological</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017268" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003826" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture, Complete, Lower</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008409" MajorTopicYN="N">Mastication</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012044" MajorTopicYN="N">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016019" MajorTopicYN="N">Survival Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>23</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>14</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16610459</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002853 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002853 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16610459
|texte= [Patient satisfaction with removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16610459" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |