Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Identifieur interne : 002736 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002735; suivant : 002737Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Auteurs : Anita Visser ; Henny J A. Meijer ; Gerry M. Raghoebar ; Arjan VissinkSource :
- The International journal of prosthodontics [ 0893-2174 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aftercare, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Care, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Vestibuloplasty.
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Adult, Aftercare, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dental Care, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Denture Retention, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Vestibuloplasty.
Abstract
This 10-year prospective, randomized, clinical trial investigated the treatment outcome of edentulous patients treated with mandibular overdentures retained by 2 endosseous implants compared with conventional dentures in patients with or without vestibuloplasty.
PubMed: 16752625
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16752625Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.</title><author><name sortKey="Visser, Anita" sort="Visser, Anita" uniqKey="Visser A" first="Anita" last="Visser">Anita Visser</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, The Netherlands. a.visser@kchir.umcg.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J A" last="Meijer">Henny J A. Meijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M" last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2006 May-Jun</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16752625</idno><idno type="pmid">16752625</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002736</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002736</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.</title><author><name sortKey="Visser, Anita" sort="Visser, Anita" uniqKey="Visser A" first="Anita" last="Visser">Anita Visser</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, The Netherlands. a.visser@kchir.umcg.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Henny J A" sort="Meijer, Henny J A" uniqKey="Meijer H" first="Henny J A" last="Meijer">Henny J A. Meijer</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gerry M" sort="Raghoebar, Gerry M" uniqKey="Raghoebar G" first="Gerry M" last="Raghoebar">Gerry M. Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vissink, Arjan" sort="Vissink, Arjan" uniqKey="Vissink A" first="Arjan" last="Vissink">Arjan Vissink</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The International journal of prosthodontics</title><idno type="ISSN">0893-2174</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aftercare</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Care</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>Vestibuloplasty</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aftercare</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Dental Care</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Denture Retention</term><term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term><term>Denture, Overlay</term><term>Female</term><term>Follow-Up Studies</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Patient Satisfaction</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Time Factors</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term><term>Vestibuloplasty</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This 10-year prospective, randomized, clinical trial investigated the treatment outcome of edentulous patients treated with mandibular overdentures retained by 2 endosseous implants compared with conventional dentures in patients with or without vestibuloplasty.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">16752625</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2006</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2006</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>15</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0893-2174</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>19</Volume><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2006 May-Jun</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The International journal of prosthodontics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Int J Prosthodont</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>271-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">This 10-year prospective, randomized, clinical trial investigated the treatment outcome of edentulous patients treated with mandibular overdentures retained by 2 endosseous implants compared with conventional dentures in patients with or without vestibuloplasty.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">One hundred fifty-one edentulous patients (5 groups) with a symphyseal mandibular bone height between 8 and 25 mm participated. Sixty-two patients were treated with an overdenture retained by 2 implants (groups 1 and 3), 59 patients were treated with a conventional denture (groups 2 and 5), and 30 patients were treated with a conventional denture after preprosthetic vestibuloplasty (group 4). Patients who received conventional dentures but preferred implants later on could undergo implant surgery after 1 year of their initial treatment, but were analyzed in their original group. The prosthetic and surgical care and aftercare were scored during a 10-year evaluation period.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">One hundred thirty-three patients completed the 10-year follow-up evaluations. Forty-four percent of patients treated with conventional dentures switched within 10 years to implant-retained overdentures, versus 16% of the patients who were treated with conventional dentures after vestibuloplasty. On average, a greater time investment and more treatment sessions were needed in patients treated with implant-retained overdentures compared to patients treated with conventional dentures.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Patients treated with an implant-retained overdenture need more treatment interventions and treatment time than patients treated with conventional dentures.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Visser</LastName><ForeName>Anita</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, The Netherlands. a.visser@kchir.umcg.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Meijer</LastName><ForeName>Henny J A</ForeName><Initials>HJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Raghoebar</LastName><ForeName>Gerry M</ForeName><Initials>GM</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Vissink</LastName><ForeName>Arjan</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Int J Prosthodont</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8900938</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0893-2174</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000359" MajorTopicYN="N">Aftercare</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003729" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture Retention</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003826" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Complete, Lower</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005500" MajorTopicYN="N">Follow-Up Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013997" MajorTopicYN="N">Time Factors</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014727" MajorTopicYN="N">Vestibuloplasty</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2006</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16752625</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002736 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002736 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16752625
|texte= Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16752625" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |