New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status.
Identifieur interne : 002479 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002478; suivant : 002480New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status.
Auteurs : T. Shimizu ; T. Ueda ; K. SakuraiSource :
- Journal of oral rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Bacteria, Anaerobic, Biofilms, Colony Count, Microbial, Halitosis (etiology), Halitosis (microbiology), Halitosis (prevention & control), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (microbiology), Observer Variation, Oral Hygiene, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tongue (microbiology), Tongue (pathology), Tongue Diseases (complications), Tongue Diseases (diagnosis), Tongue Diseases (microbiology).
- MESH :
- complications : Tongue Diseases.
- diagnosis : Tongue Diseases.
- etiology : Halitosis.
- microbiology : Halitosis, Jaw, Edentulous, Tongue, Tongue Diseases.
- pathology : Tongue.
- prevention & control : Halitosis.
- Bacteria, Anaerobic, Biofilms, Colony Count, Microbial, Humans, Observer Variation, Oral Hygiene, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the viability of Tongue Coating Index, which is a new method for evaluating tongue-coating status. To determine the reliability and reproducibility of our new evaluation criteria (Score 0: Tongue coating not visible; Score 1: Tongue coating thin, papillae of tongue visible; Score 2: Tongue coating very thick, papillae of tongue not visible), 10 observers evaluated 20 photographs of tongues. Each tongue surface was divided into nine sections. Observers evaluated each section according to our new criteria and each score for tongue-coating status was recorded in the pertinent section of the Tongue Coating Record form. They repeated the same evaluation 2 weeks after the first evaluation. The relationship between the scores obtained and number of oral microorganisms was investigated in 50 edentulous patients. Tongue coating was collected from the tongue surface after evaluation of tongue-coating status. The total number of anaerobic bacteria and the number of Candida species were counted from the specimens collected. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver agreement were 0.66 and 0.80 by Cohen's kappa, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the number of Candida species among the three scores. The number of total anaerobic bacteria, however, was significantly different among the scores (P < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that our method for evaluating tongue-coating status offers new criteria that are superior in reliability and reproducibility, and that also reflect the total number of anaerobic bacteria present on the dorsum of the tongue.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01733.x
PubMed: 17518979
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17518979Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Shimizu, T" sort="Shimizu, T" uniqKey="Shimizu T" first="T" last="Shimizu">T. Shimizu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics and Gerodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba city, Japan. tshimizu@tdc.ac.jp</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ueda, T" sort="Ueda, T" uniqKey="Ueda T" first="T" last="Ueda">T. Ueda</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sakurai, K" sort="Sakurai, K" uniqKey="Sakurai K" first="K" last="Sakurai">K. Sakurai</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17518979</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17518979</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01733.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002479</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002479</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Shimizu, T" sort="Shimizu, T" uniqKey="Shimizu T" first="T" last="Shimizu">T. Shimizu</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics and Gerodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba city, Japan. tshimizu@tdc.ac.jp</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ueda, T" sort="Ueda, T" uniqKey="Ueda T" first="T" last="Ueda">T. Ueda</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sakurai, K" sort="Sakurai, K" uniqKey="Sakurai K" first="K" last="Sakurai">K. Sakurai</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Bacteria, Anaerobic</term>
<term>Biofilms</term>
<term>Colony Count, Microbial</term>
<term>Halitosis (etiology)</term>
<term>Halitosis (microbiology)</term>
<term>Halitosis (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (microbiology)</term>
<term>Observer Variation</term>
<term>Oral Hygiene</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
<term>Tongue (microbiology)</term>
<term>Tongue (pathology)</term>
<term>Tongue Diseases (complications)</term>
<term>Tongue Diseases (diagnosis)</term>
<term>Tongue Diseases (microbiology)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="complications" xml:lang="en"><term>Tongue Diseases</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Tongue Diseases</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Halitosis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="microbiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Halitosis</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Tongue</term>
<term>Tongue Diseases</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="pathology" xml:lang="en"><term>Tongue</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Halitosis</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Bacteria, Anaerobic</term>
<term>Biofilms</term>
<term>Colony Count, Microbial</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Observer Variation</term>
<term>Oral Hygiene</term>
<term>Reproducibility of Results</term>
<term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The purpose of this study was to determine the viability of Tongue Coating Index, which is a new method for evaluating tongue-coating status. To determine the reliability and reproducibility of our new evaluation criteria (Score 0: Tongue coating not visible; Score 1: Tongue coating thin, papillae of tongue visible; Score 2: Tongue coating very thick, papillae of tongue not visible), 10 observers evaluated 20 photographs of tongues. Each tongue surface was divided into nine sections. Observers evaluated each section according to our new criteria and each score for tongue-coating status was recorded in the pertinent section of the Tongue Coating Record form. They repeated the same evaluation 2 weeks after the first evaluation. The relationship between the scores obtained and number of oral microorganisms was investigated in 50 edentulous patients. Tongue coating was collected from the tongue surface after evaluation of tongue-coating status. The total number of anaerobic bacteria and the number of Candida species were counted from the specimens collected. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver agreement were 0.66 and 0.80 by Cohen's kappa, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the number of Candida species among the three scores. The number of total anaerobic bacteria, however, was significantly different among the scores (P < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that our method for evaluating tongue-coating status offers new criteria that are superior in reliability and reproducibility, and that also reflect the total number of anaerobic bacteria present on the dorsum of the tongue.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17518979</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>13</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>05</Month>
<Day>23</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0305-182X</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>34</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>Jun</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>442-7</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>The purpose of this study was to determine the viability of Tongue Coating Index, which is a new method for evaluating tongue-coating status. To determine the reliability and reproducibility of our new evaluation criteria (Score 0: Tongue coating not visible; Score 1: Tongue coating thin, papillae of tongue visible; Score 2: Tongue coating very thick, papillae of tongue not visible), 10 observers evaluated 20 photographs of tongues. Each tongue surface was divided into nine sections. Observers evaluated each section according to our new criteria and each score for tongue-coating status was recorded in the pertinent section of the Tongue Coating Record form. They repeated the same evaluation 2 weeks after the first evaluation. The relationship between the scores obtained and number of oral microorganisms was investigated in 50 edentulous patients. Tongue coating was collected from the tongue surface after evaluation of tongue-coating status. The total number of anaerobic bacteria and the number of Candida species were counted from the specimens collected. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver agreement were 0.66 and 0.80 by Cohen's kappa, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the number of Candida species among the three scores. The number of total anaerobic bacteria, however, was significantly different among the scores (P < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that our method for evaluating tongue-coating status offers new criteria that are superior in reliability and reproducibility, and that also reflect the total number of anaerobic bacteria present on the dorsum of the tongue.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Shimizu</LastName>
<ForeName>T</ForeName>
<Initials>T</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Removable Prosthodontics and Gerodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba city, Japan. tshimizu@tdc.ac.jp</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ueda</LastName>
<ForeName>T</ForeName>
<Initials>T</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sakurai</LastName>
<ForeName>K</ForeName>
<Initials>K</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D023362">Evaluation Studies</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Oral Rehabil</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0433604</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0305-182X</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001421" MajorTopicYN="N">Bacteria, Anaerobic</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018441" MajorTopicYN="Y">Biofilms</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015169" MajorTopicYN="N">Colony Count, Microbial</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006209" MajorTopicYN="N">Halitosis</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="N">prevention & control</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015588" MajorTopicYN="N">Observer Variation</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009910" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Hygiene</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012680" MajorTopicYN="N">Sensitivity and Specificity</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014059" MajorTopicYN="N">Tongue</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000473" MajorTopicYN="Y">pathology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014060" MajorTopicYN="N">Tongue Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="N">complications</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000175" MajorTopicYN="Y">diagnosis</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000382" MajorTopicYN="N">microbiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>14</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>24</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17518979</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">JOR1733</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01733.x</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002479 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002479 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:17518979 |texte= New method for evaluation of tongue-coating status. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17518979" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. | ![]() |