Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement.
Identifieur interne : 002427 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002426; suivant : 002428Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement.
Auteurs : M. Esposito ; M G Grusovin ; E. Martinis ; P. Coulthard ; H V WorthingtonSource :
- The Cochrane database of systematic reviews [ 1469-493X ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- methods : Dental Implantation.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Gingiva, Mouth Mucosa.
- Humans, Mandible, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic.
Abstract
Implants may be placed penetrating the oral mucosa (1-stage procedure) or can be completely buried under the oral mucosa (2-stage procedure) during the healing phase of the bone at the implant surface. With a 2-stage procedure the risk of having unwanted loading onto the implants is minimized, but a second minor surgical intervention is needed to connect the healing abutments and more time is needed prior to start the prosthetic phase because of the wound-healing period required in relation to the second surgical intervention.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006698
PubMed: 17636848
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:17636848Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement.</title><author><name sortKey="Esposito, M" sort="Esposito, M" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="M" last="Esposito">M. Esposito</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, UK, M15 6FH. espositomarco@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grusovin, M G" sort="Grusovin, M G" uniqKey="Grusovin M" first="M G" last="Grusovin">M G Grusovin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Martinis, E" sort="Martinis, E" uniqKey="Martinis E" first="E" last="Martinis">E. Martinis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Coulthard, P" sort="Coulthard, P" uniqKey="Coulthard P" first="P" last="Coulthard">P. Coulthard</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worthington, H V" sort="Worthington, H V" uniqKey="Worthington H" first="H V" last="Worthington">H V Worthington</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:17636848</idno><idno type="pmid">17636848</idno><idno type="doi">10.1002/14651858.CD006698</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002427</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002427</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement.</title><author><name sortKey="Esposito, M" sort="Esposito, M" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="M" last="Esposito">M. Esposito</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, UK, M15 6FH. espositomarco@hotmail.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grusovin, M G" sort="Grusovin, M G" uniqKey="Grusovin M" first="M G" last="Grusovin">M G Grusovin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Martinis, E" sort="Martinis, E" uniqKey="Martinis E" first="E" last="Martinis">E. Martinis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Coulthard, P" sort="Coulthard, P" uniqKey="Coulthard P" first="P" last="Coulthard">P. Coulthard</name></author><author><name sortKey="Worthington, H V" sort="Worthington, H V" uniqKey="Worthington H" first="H V" last="Worthington">H V Worthington</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><idno type="eISSN">1469-493X</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation (methods)</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Gingiva (surgery)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Mouth Mucosa (surgery)</term><term>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Gingiva</term><term>Mouth Mucosa</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term><term>Mandible</term><term>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Implants may be placed penetrating the oral mucosa (1-stage procedure) or can be completely buried under the oral mucosa (2-stage procedure) during the healing phase of the bone at the implant surface. With a 2-stage procedure the risk of having unwanted loading onto the implants is minimized, but a second minor surgical intervention is needed to connect the healing abutments and more time is needed prior to start the prosthetic phase because of the wound-healing period required in relation to the second surgical intervention.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">17636848</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>18</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>28</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1469-493X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Issue>3</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Jul</Month><Day>18</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Cochrane database of systematic reviews</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>CD006698</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Implants may be placed penetrating the oral mucosa (1-stage procedure) or can be completely buried under the oral mucosa (2-stage procedure) during the healing phase of the bone at the implant surface. With a 2-stage procedure the risk of having unwanted loading onto the implants is minimized, but a second minor surgical intervention is needed to connect the healing abutments and more time is needed prior to start the prosthetic phase because of the wound-healing period required in relation to the second surgical intervention.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To evaluate whether a 1-stage implant placement procedure is as effective as a 2-stage procedure.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SEARCH STRATEGY" NlmCategory="METHODS">The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Handsearching included several dental journals. Authors of all identified trials, an internet discussion group and 55 dental implant manufacturers were contacted to find unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The last electronic search was conducted on 15 January 2007.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="SELECTION CRITERIA" NlmCategory="METHODS">All RCTs of root-form osseointegrated dental implants comparing the same 2-piece osseointegrated root-form dental implants placed according to 1- versus 2-stage procedures with a minimum follow up of 6 months after loading. Outcome measures were: prosthesis failures, implant failures, marginal bone level changes on intraoral radiographs, patient preference including aesthetics, aesthetics evaluated by dentists, and complications.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Screening of eligible studies, assessment of the methodological quality of the trials and data extraction were conducted in duplicate and independently by two review authors. Authors were contacted for missing information. Results were expressed as random-effects models using mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was to be investigated including both clinical and methodological factors.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MAIN RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Three RCTs were identified and two trials including 45 patients in total were included. On a patient, rather than per implant basis, there were no statistically significant differences.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The number of patients included in the trials was too small to draw reliable conclusions, however it appears that the two procedures did not show clinical significant differences. If these preliminary results will be confirmed by more robust trials, a 1-stage procedure might be preferable since it avoids one minor surgical intervention and shortens the waiting time to provide the final restoration. There might be specific situations though, such as when optimal implant stability is not obtained at placement or when barriers are used in conjunction with implants, in which a 2-stage approach might be preferable.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Esposito</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester, UK, M15 6FH. espositomarco@hotmail.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Grusovin</LastName><ForeName>M G</ForeName><Initials>MG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Martinis</LastName><ForeName>E</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Coulthard</LastName><ForeName>P</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Worthington</LastName><ForeName>H V</ForeName><Initials>HV</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D017418">Meta-Analysis</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2007</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>18</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100909747</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1361-6137</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="UpdateIn"><RefSource>Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD006698</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19588400</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003757" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005881" MajorTopicYN="N">Gingiva</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009061" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth Mucosa</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016032" MajorTopicYN="N">Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><NumberOfReferences>13</NumberOfReferences></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17636848</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1002/14651858.CD006698</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002427 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002427 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:17636848
|texte= Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:17636848" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |