Denture marking--patient preference of various methods.
Identifieur interne : 002344 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002343; suivant : 002345Denture marking--patient preference of various methods.
Auteurs : Raymond Richmond ; Iain A. PrettySource :
- Journal of forensic sciences [ 0022-1198 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- instrumentation : Denture Identification Marking.
- methods : Denture Identification Marking.
- Aged, Dentures, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Male, Miniaturization, Patient Satisfaction, Radio.
Abstract
Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x
PubMed: 18093064
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:18093064Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Denture marking--patient preference of various methods.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K. iain.pretty@manchester.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A" last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:18093064</idno>
<idno type="pmid">18093064</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002344</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002344</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Denture marking--patient preference of various methods.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Richmond, Raymond" sort="Richmond, Raymond" uniqKey="Richmond R" first="Raymond" last="Richmond">Raymond Richmond</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K. iain.pretty@manchester.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pretty, Iain A" sort="Pretty, Iain A" uniqKey="Pretty I" first="Iain A" last="Pretty">Iain A. Pretty</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Journal of forensic sciences</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-1198</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Denture Identification Marking (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Denture Identification Marking (methods)</term>
<term>Dentures</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Miniaturization</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Radio</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Identification Marking</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Identification Marking</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Dentures</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Miniaturization</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Radio</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">18093064</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>02</Month>
<Day>28</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2017</Year>
<Month>09</Month>
<Day>22</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0022-1198</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>52</Volume>
<Issue>6</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>Nov</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Journal of forensic sciences</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>J. Forensic Sci.</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Denture marking--patient preference of various methods.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1338-42</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>Dental forensic organizations world wide have recommended that dental prostheses should be labeled with at least the patient's (wearer's) name and preferably with further unique identifiers such as social security number. A range of methods are available and the purpose of this study was to determine, via the means of a visual questionnaire, which are the most preferable to those patients who wear complete dentures. One hundred edentulous patients attending the Manchester Dental Hospital were shown a range of denture labeling methods and asked to rank these according to their preference. The most preferred method was that of an embedded radio frequency identification microchip (38% rated this as first) and the second was an inclusion technique using onion paper (24% rated this as first). The least preferred method was the use of a groove cut into the denture flange with 71% of patients rating this as the poorest in terms of esthetics. The study demonstrates that the method of denture labeling is important to patients and to ensure that denture labeling is performed routinely esthetic preferences must be considered.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Richmond</LastName>
<ForeName>Raymond</ForeName>
<Initials>R</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Forensic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, U.K. iain.pretty@manchester.ac.uk</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pretty</LastName>
<ForeName>Iain A</ForeName>
<Initials>IA</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>DHCS/05/05/008</GrantID>
<Agency>Department of Health</Agency>
<Country>United Kingdom</Country>
</Grant>
</GrantList>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country>
<MedlineTA>J Forensic Sci</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>0375370</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0022-1198</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003821" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Identification Marking</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003778" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dentures</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008904" MajorTopicYN="N">Miniaturization</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011845" MajorTopicYN="N">Radio</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2008</Year>
<Month>2</Month>
<Day>29</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2007</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>9</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18093064</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">JFO586</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00586.x</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002344 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002344 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= PubMed |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= pubmed:18093064 |texte= Denture marking--patient preference of various methods. }}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:18093064" \ | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \ | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |