Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients.
Identifieur interne : 002025 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 002024; suivant : 002026Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients.
Auteurs : C R Leles ; W J Morandini ; E T Da Silva ; M. De F Nunes ; M C M. FreireSource :
- Journal of oral rehabilitation [ 1365-2842 ] ; 2008.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dentures (adverse effects), Dentures (psychology), Female, Humans, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Oral Health, Physician-Patient Relations, Prosthodontics (methods), Qualitative Research, Quality of Life (psychology), Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Dentures.
- methods : Prosthodontics.
- psychology : Dentures, Quality of Life.
- rehabilitation : Mouth, Edentulous.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Oral Health, Physician-Patient Relations, Qualitative Research, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio-demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two-phase data collection (open-ended and closed-form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject's perception scores in a 5-point Likert-type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one-way anova, independent t-test and two-way anova (general linear model). Respondents' mean age was 51.8 years (s.d.=12.3), and 74% were female. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.90. Patients' mean scores ranged from 2.37 to 4.88 (mean=4.25; s.d.=0.65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects' perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x
PubMed: 18793353
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:18793353Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients.</title><author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C R" last="Leles">C R Leles</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil. crleles@odonto.ufg.br</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Morandini, W J" sort="Morandini, W J" uniqKey="Morandini W" first="W J" last="Morandini">W J Morandini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Da Silva, E T" sort="Da Silva, E T" uniqKey="Da Silva E" first="E T" last="Da Silva">E T Da Silva</name></author><author><name sortKey="De F Nunes, M" sort="De F Nunes, M" uniqKey="De F Nunes M" first="M" last="De F Nunes">M. De F Nunes</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freire, M C M" sort="Freire, M C M" uniqKey="Freire M" first="M C M" last="Freire">M C M. Freire</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:18793353</idno><idno type="pmid">18793353</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">002025</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002025</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients.</title><author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C R" last="Leles">C R Leles</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil. crleles@odonto.ufg.br</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Morandini, W J" sort="Morandini, W J" uniqKey="Morandini W" first="W J" last="Morandini">W J Morandini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Da Silva, E T" sort="Da Silva, E T" uniqKey="Da Silva E" first="E T" last="Da Silva">E T Da Silva</name></author><author><name sortKey="De F Nunes, M" sort="De F Nunes, M" uniqKey="De F Nunes M" first="M" last="De F Nunes">M. De F Nunes</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freire, M C M" sort="Freire, M C M" uniqKey="Freire M" first="M C M" last="Freire">M C M. Freire</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><date when="2008" type="published">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Dentures (adverse effects)</term><term>Dentures (psychology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Linear Models</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Mouth, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Physician-Patient Relations</term><term>Prosthodontics (methods)</term><term>Qualitative Research</term><term>Quality of Life (psychology)</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dentures</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Prosthodontics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dentures</term><term>Quality of Life</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Mouth, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cross-Sectional Studies</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Linear Models</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Oral Health</term><term>Physician-Patient Relations</term><term>Qualitative Research</term><term>Surveys and Questionnaires</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio-demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two-phase data collection (open-ended and closed-form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject's perception scores in a 5-point Likert-type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one-way anova, independent t-test and two-way anova (general linear model). Respondents' mean age was 51.8 years (s.d.=12.3), and 74% were female. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.90. Patients' mean scores ranged from 2.37 to 4.88 (mean=4.25; s.d.=0.65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects' perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">18793353</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2009</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1365-2842</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>35</Volume><Issue>9</Issue><PubDate><Year>2008</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Rehabil</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>682-9</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The aim was to develop an instrument to measure and to explore the perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients, including benefits, risks and consequences of non replacement of missing teeth. It was also aimed to assess the influence of clinical and socio-demographic variables on the perception of potential outcomes. Using a two-phase data collection (open-ended and closed-form), a scale was developed containing 41 statements to measure subject's perception scores in a 5-point Likert-type scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). In the second phase 126 partially or fully edentulous subjects were interviewed. Influence of age, gender and clinical variables on perceived outcomes were tested using one-way anova, independent t-test and two-way anova (general linear model). Respondents' mean age was 51.8 years (s.d.=12.3), and 74% were female. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale and subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.90. Patients' mean scores ranged from 2.37 to 4.88 (mean=4.25; s.d.=0.65), indicating that subjects tended to agree with the proposed affirmatives (scores 4 and 5). Perception scores were influenced by age, gender, edentulous spaces and use of prosthodontics. Older subjects, female, those with higher number of missing teeth and who have been previously treated had greater perception of benefits and risks of prosthodontic treatment. It was concluded that the proposed instrument was suitable for measuring subjects' perception of potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Leles</LastName><ForeName>C R</ForeName><Initials>CR</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiâs, Goiânia, Goiâs, Brazil. crleles@odonto.ufg.br</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Morandini</LastName><ForeName>W J</ForeName><Initials>WJ</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>da Silva</LastName><ForeName>E T</ForeName><Initials>ET</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de F Nunes</LastName><ForeName>M</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Freire</LastName><ForeName>M C M</ForeName><Initials>MC</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Rehabil</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0433604</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0305-182X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003430" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Sectional Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003778" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentures</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="Y">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016014" MajorTopicYN="N">Linear Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009066" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouth, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009909" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010817" MajorTopicYN="N">Physician-Patient Relations</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011476" MajorTopicYN="N">Prosthodontics</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D036301" MajorTopicYN="N">Qualitative Research</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="N">Quality of Life</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011795" MajorTopicYN="N">Surveys and Questionnaires</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2008</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2009</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>7</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2008</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18793353</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">JOR1839</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01839.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002025 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002025 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:18793353
|texte= Assessing perceived potential outcomes of prosthodontic treatment in partial and fully edentulous patients.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:18793353" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |