A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.
Identifieur interne : 001E48 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001E47; suivant : 001E49A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.
Auteurs : Pietro Felice ; Antonio Scarano ; Roberto Pistilli ; Luigi Checchi ; Maurizio Piattelli ; Gerardo Pellegrino ; Marco EspositoSource :
- European journal of oral implantology [ 1756-2406 ] ; 2009.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Absorbable Implants, Adult, Bone Regeneration (drug effects), Bone Substitutes (pharmacology), Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (adverse effects), Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (methods), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation), Lactic Acid, Male, Maxillary Sinus (surgery), Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Minerals (pharmacology), Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (adverse effects), Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (methods), Pilot Projects, Polyglycolic Acid, Treatment Outcome.
- MESH :
- chemical , pharmacology : Bone Substitutes, Minerals.
- adverse effects : Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic.
- drug effects : Bone Regeneration.
- methods : Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal, Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous, Partially.
- surgery : Maxillary Sinus.
- Absorbable Implants, Adult, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Lactic Acid, Male, Membranes, Artificial, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Polyglycolic Acid, Treatment Outcome.
Abstract
To compare the efficacy of two different techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using a lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers (Inion) versus granular anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss).
PubMed: 20467605
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20467605Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Scarano, Antonio" sort="Scarano, Antonio" uniqKey="Scarano A" first="Antonio" last="Scarano">Antonio Scarano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pistilli, Roberto" sort="Pistilli, Roberto" uniqKey="Pistilli R" first="Roberto" last="Pistilli">Roberto Pistilli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Luigi" sort="Checchi, Luigi" uniqKey="Checchi L" first="Luigi" last="Checchi">Luigi Checchi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Maurizio" sort="Piattelli, Maurizio" uniqKey="Piattelli M" first="Maurizio" last="Piattelli">Maurizio Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2009">2009</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20467605</idno><idno type="pmid">20467605</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E48</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001E48</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.</title><author><name sortKey="Felice, Pietro" sort="Felice, Pietro" uniqKey="Felice P" first="Pietro" last="Felice">Pietro Felice</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Scarano, Antonio" sort="Scarano, Antonio" uniqKey="Scarano A" first="Antonio" last="Scarano">Antonio Scarano</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pistilli, Roberto" sort="Pistilli, Roberto" uniqKey="Pistilli R" first="Roberto" last="Pistilli">Roberto Pistilli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Checchi, Luigi" sort="Checchi, Luigi" uniqKey="Checchi L" first="Luigi" last="Checchi">Luigi Checchi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Maurizio" sort="Piattelli, Maurizio" uniqKey="Piattelli M" first="Maurizio" last="Piattelli">Maurizio Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pellegrino, Gerardo" sort="Pellegrino, Gerardo" uniqKey="Pellegrino G" first="Gerardo" last="Pellegrino">Gerardo Pellegrino</name></author><author><name sortKey="Esposito, Marco" sort="Esposito, Marco" uniqKey="Esposito M" first="Marco" last="Esposito">Marco Esposito</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">European journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">1756-2406</idno><imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Absorbable Implants</term><term>Adult</term><term>Bone Regeneration (drug effects)</term><term>Bone Substitutes (pharmacology)</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (adverse effects)</term><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially (rehabilitation)</term><term>Lactic Acid</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxillary Sinus (surgery)</term><term>Membranes, Artificial</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Minerals (pharmacology)</term><term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (adverse effects)</term><term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (methods)</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Polyglycolic Acid</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="pharmacology" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Substitutes</term><term>Minerals</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal</term><term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="drug effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Regeneration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal</term><term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Maxillary Sinus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Absorbable Implants</term><term>Adult</term><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term><term>Dental Restoration Failure</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lactic Acid</term><term>Male</term><term>Membranes, Artificial</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Polyglycolic Acid</term><term>Treatment Outcome</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the efficacy of two different techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using a lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers (Inion) versus granular anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss).</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20467605</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>06</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2013</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>21</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">1756-2406</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>2</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2009</Year><Season>Winter</Season></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>European journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Eur J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>293-306</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">To compare the efficacy of two different techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using a lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers (Inion) versus granular anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Ten partially edentulous patients having bilaterally 1 to 5 mm of residual bone height and at least 5 mm bone width below the maxillary sinuses, as measured on computed tomography (CT) scans, were randomised to receive two different 2-stage sinus lift procedures using the lateral window approach. In one side, the sinus lining was raised by placing a resorbable rigid Inion barrier without any bone substitute whereas the contralateral side was loosely packed with 100% granular Bio-Oss. After 6 months, 2 to 3 implants were inserted at each side and submerged for 4 months. Implants were loaded with provisional acrylic prostheses and replaced after 4 months, by definitive screwretained metal-ceramic prostheses. Outcome measures were: time necessary to complete the augmentation procedure, bone gain on CT scans, histomorphometry, any complication, implant and prosthetic failures, and clinician and patient preference assessed by a blinded outcome assessor. All patients were followed up to 5 months after loading.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">No patient dropped out. There was no significant difference in time to complete the augmentation procedure (19.8 minutes for Inion versus 20.5 for Bio-Oss). After 6 months, both interventions gained bone in a highly statistically significant way (14.4 mm for Inion versus 14.1 mm for Bio- Oss) with no significant differences between the procedures. Histologically, more new bone formed at Bio-Oss treated sites (36.1% versus 24.2%), the difference being highly statistically significant (P = 0.002). There were no differences in complications between groups (2 perforations of the maxillary lining at Inion treated sites versus 1 at a Bio-Oss site), however, in one of the patients where a perforation occurred at the Inion site, at implant placement, the sinus was two-thirds filled with soft tissue and the site was successfully retreated with Bio-Oss. No implant failed. The clinician preferred Bio-Oss because it was simpler to handle. There were no statistically significant differences in patient preference 1 month after surgery and 1 month after delivery of definitive prostheses: 8 patients had no preference while 2 preferred the Bio-Oss treated side.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Although bone grafting is not needed to augment atrophic maxillary sinuses since it is sufficient to keep space with a rigid barrier, bone was histologically more mature and appeared to be clinically harder when using Bio-Oss. Moreover, it was judged simpler to fill sinuses with a bone substitute than to position a rigid barrier for maintaining space.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Felice</LastName><ForeName>Pietro</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontology and Implantology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Scarano</LastName><ForeName>Antonio</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pistilli</LastName><ForeName>Roberto</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Checchi</LastName><ForeName>Luigi</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Piattelli</LastName><ForeName>Maurizio</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pellegrino</LastName><ForeName>Gerardo</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Esposito</LastName><ForeName>Marco</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>Eur J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101473719</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1756-2406</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C077540">Bio-Oss</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018786">Bone Substitutes</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D008567">Membranes, Artificial</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D008903">Minerals</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C043435">polylactic acid-polyglycolic acid copolymer</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>26009-03-0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D011100">Polyglycolic Acid</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>33X04XA5AT</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D019344">Lactic Acid</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020341" MajorTopicYN="N">Absorbable Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001861" MajorTopicYN="Y">Bone Regeneration</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000187" MajorTopicYN="N">drug effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018786" MajorTopicYN="Y">Bone Substitutes</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="N">pharmacology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016557" MajorTopicYN="N">Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007576" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous, Partially</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019344" MajorTopicYN="N">Lactic Acid</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008443" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxillary Sinus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008567" MajorTopicYN="Y">Membranes, Artificial</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008903" MajorTopicYN="N">Minerals</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000494" MajorTopicYN="N">pharmacology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013516" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011100" MajorTopicYN="N">Polyglycolic Acid</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>0</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20467605</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">18120</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001E48 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001E48 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20467605
|texte= A comparison of two techniques to augment maxillary sinuses using the lateral window approach: rigid synthetic resorbable barriers versus anorganic bovine bone. Five-month post-loading clinical and histological results of a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20467605" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |