EdenteV2, PubMed, Corpus, bibRecord, 001B52

Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.

Identifieur interne : 001B52 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001B51; suivant : 001B53

Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.

Auteurs : Janice Susan Ellis ; Gamal Burawi ; Angus Walls ; John Mark Thomason

Source :

Clinical oral implants research [ 1600-0501 ] ; 2009.

RBID : pubmed:19832769

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Aged, Cross-Over Studies, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (instrumentation), Denture Design, Denture Retention (instrumentation), Denture Retention (methods), Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Longitudinal Studies, Magnetics, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Statistics, Nonparametric, Treatment Outcome.
MESH :
- chemical : Dental Implants.
- instrumentation : Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Denture Retention.
- methods : Denture Retention.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Aged, Cross-Over Studies, Denture Design, Denture, Complete, Lower, Denture, Overlay, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetics, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Statistics, Nonparametric, Treatment Outcome.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare ball and magnet attachments within implant-supported mandibular overdentures (ISMOD) using patient centred outcome measures. Our a priori hypothesis was that there is no difference in patient satisfaction between the two attachment types.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01810.x
PubMed: 19832769

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:19832769

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ellis, Janice Susan" sort="Ellis, Janice Susan" uniqKey="Ellis J" first="Janice Susan" last="Ellis">Janice Susan Ellis</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK. j.s.ellis@ncl.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burawi, Gamal" sort="Burawi, Gamal" uniqKey="Burawi G" first="Gamal" last="Burawi">Gamal Burawi</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Walls, Angus" sort="Walls, Angus" uniqKey="Walls A" first="Angus" last="Walls">Angus Walls</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Thomason, John Mark" sort="Thomason, John Mark" uniqKey="Thomason J" first="John Mark" last="Thomason">John Mark Thomason</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:19832769</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19832769</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01810.x</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001B52</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001B52</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Ellis, Janice Susan" sort="Ellis, Janice Susan" uniqKey="Ellis J" first="Janice Susan" last="Ellis">Janice Susan Ellis</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK. j.s.ellis@ncl.ac.uk</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burawi, Gamal" sort="Burawi, Gamal" uniqKey="Burawi G" first="Gamal" last="Burawi">Gamal Burawi</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Walls, Angus" sort="Walls, Angus" uniqKey="Walls A" first="Angus" last="Walls">Angus Walls</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Thomason, John Mark" sort="Thomason, John Mark" uniqKey="Thomason J" first="John Mark" last="Thomason">John Mark Thomason</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno>
<imprint><date when="2009" type="published">2009</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Cross-Over Studies</term>
<term>Dental Implants</term>
<term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Denture Design</term>
<term>Denture Retention (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Denture Retention (methods)</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term>
<term>Longitudinal Studies</term>
<term>Magnetics</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implants</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</term>
<term>Denture Retention</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Denture Retention</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term>
<term>Cross-Over Studies</term>
<term>Denture Design</term>
<term>Denture, Complete, Lower</term>
<term>Denture, Overlay</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Longitudinal Studies</term>
<term>Magnetics</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Patient Satisfaction</term>
<term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term>
<term>Treatment Outcome</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to compare ball and magnet attachments within implant-supported mandibular overdentures (ISMOD) using patient centred outcome measures. Our a priori hypothesis was that there is no difference in patient satisfaction between the two attachment types.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19832769</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>01</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1600-0501</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>20</Volume>
<Issue>11</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>Nov</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>1293-8</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01810.x</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText Label="OBJECTIVE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The aim of this study was to compare ball and magnet attachments within implant-supported mandibular overdentures (ISMOD) using patient centred outcome measures. Our a priori hypothesis was that there is no difference in patient satisfaction between the two attachment types.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="MATERIAL AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">In this within-subject crossover randomised clinical trial, edentulous patients were recruited to the study and completed a denture satisfaction questionnaire before having two implants placed in the intraforaminal region of the mandible. They were randomly assigned to receive an ISMOD retained by either ball or magnetic attachment. After 3 months satisfaction questionnaires were repeated before attachments were changed to the alternative design. After a further 3 months patients completed final questionnaires. Patients were asked to choose their preferred prostheses and record the most influential factors in their final choice. The outcome variables of patient satisfaction were compared between baseline and the two attachment types using non-parametric two-related sample tests (Wilcoxon's signed rank).</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="RESULTS AND DISCUSSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Sixteen patients completed the study. Patient satisfaction improved significantly between baseline and the new prosthesis with each attachment type for all domains of satisfaction (P<0.05). Ball attachments provided greater satisfaction in the domains of general satisfaction, stability and ability to chew (P<0.05). Patients' general satisfaction with ball attachment retained overdentures was greater than that for magnetic attachments; however, both designs provide significantly greater satisfaction than conventional dentures. In this study, the majority preferred to retain the ball attachment although one-third of patients actively chose the magnetic attachment.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ellis</LastName>
<ForeName>Janice Susan</ForeName>
<Initials>JS</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK. j.s.ellis@ncl.ac.uk</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Burawi</LastName>
<ForeName>Gamal</ForeName>
<Initials>G</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Walls</LastName>
<ForeName>Angus</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Thomason</LastName>
<ForeName>John Mark</ForeName>
<Initials>JM</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country>
<MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018592" MajorTopicYN="N">Cross-Over Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implants</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019094" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003779" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Design</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003781" MajorTopicYN="N">Denture Retention</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003826" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Complete, Lower</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003828" MajorTopicYN="Y">Denture, Overlay</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="Y">rehabilitation</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008137" MajorTopicYN="N">Longitudinal Studies</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008280" MajorTopicYN="N">Magnetics</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017060" MajorTopicYN="Y">Patient Satisfaction</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016896" MajorTopicYN="N">Treatment Outcome</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>10</Month>
<Day>17</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>1</Month>
<Day>5</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19832769</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">CLR1810</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01810.x</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B52 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B52 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:19832769
   |texte=   Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:19832769" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.

Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki