A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement.
Identifieur interne : 001982 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001981; suivant : 001983A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement.
Auteurs : Jerome A. Lindeboom ; Arjen J. Van WijkSource :
- Clinical oral implants research [ 1600-0501 ] ; 2010.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Dental Anxiety (etiology), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (adverse effects), Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods), Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Mandible (surgery), Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care) (methods), Pain, Postoperative, Quality of Life, Statistics, Nonparametric, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic (etiology), Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Surgical Flaps.
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- etiology : Dental Anxiety, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic.
- methods : Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Outcome Assessment (Health Care).
- surgery : Jaw, Edentulous, Mandible.
- Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Postoperative, Quality of Life, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Surgical Flaps.
Abstract
Flapless implant surgery is considered to offer advantages over the traditional flap access approach. There may be minimized bleeding, decreased surgical times and minimal patient discomfort. Controlled studies comparing patient outcome variables to support these assumptions, however, are lacking.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01866.x
PubMed: 20128828
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:20128828Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement.</title><author><name sortKey="Lindeboom, Jerome A" sort="Lindeboom, Jerome A" uniqKey="Lindeboom J" first="Jerome A" last="Lindeboom">Jerome A. Lindeboom</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.a.lindeboom@amc.uva.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Wijk, Arjen J" sort="Van Wijk, Arjen J" uniqKey="Van Wijk A" first="Arjen J" last="Van Wijk">Arjen J. Van Wijk</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:20128828</idno><idno type="pmid">20128828</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01866.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001982</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001982</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement.</title><author><name sortKey="Lindeboom, Jerome A" sort="Lindeboom, Jerome A" uniqKey="Lindeboom J" first="Jerome A" last="Lindeboom">Jerome A. Lindeboom</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.a.lindeboom@amc.uva.nl</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Van Wijk, Arjen J" sort="Van Wijk, Arjen J" uniqKey="Van Wijk A" first="Arjen J" last="Van Wijk">Arjen J. Van Wijk</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical oral implants research</title><idno type="eISSN">1600-0501</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Anxiety (etiology)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (adverse effects)</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (methods)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) (methods)</term><term>Pain, Postoperative</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic (etiology)</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Surgical Flaps</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Anxiety</term><term>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Humans</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Pain, Postoperative</term><term>Quality of Life</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term><term>Surgical Flaps</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Flapless implant surgery is considered to offer advantages over the traditional flap access approach. There may be minimized bleeding, decreased surgical times and minimal patient discomfort. Controlled studies comparing patient outcome variables to support these assumptions, however, are lacking.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20128828</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2010</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>05</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2010</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>06</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1600-0501</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>21</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Month>Apr</Month><Day>01</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical oral implants research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Oral Implants Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>366-70</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01866.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Flapless implant surgery is considered to offer advantages over the traditional flap access approach. There may be minimized bleeding, decreased surgical times and minimal patient discomfort. Controlled studies comparing patient outcome variables to support these assumptions, however, are lacking.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="AIM" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The objective of this clinical study was to compare patient outcome variables using flapless and flapped implant surgical techniques.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PATIENTS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">From January 2008 to October 2008, 16 consecutive patients with edentulous maxillas were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to either implant placement with a flapless procedure (eight patients, mean age 54.6 + or - 2.9 years) or surgery with a conventional flap procedure (eight patients, mean age 58.7 + or - 7.2 years). All implants were placed using a Nobel guide CT-guided surgical template. Outcome measures were the Dutch version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), dental anxiety using the s-DAI and oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Ninety-six implants were successfully placed. All implants were placed as two-phase implants and the after-implant placement dentures were adapted. No differences could be shown between conditions on dental anxiety (s-DAI), emotional impact (IES-R), anxiety, procedure duration or technical difficulty, although the flapless group did score consistently higher. The flap procedure group reported less impact on quality of life and included more patients who reported feeling no pain at all during placement.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Differences found in the patient outcome variables do suggest that patients in the flapless implant group had to endure more than patients in the flap group.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lindeboom</LastName><ForeName>Jerome A</ForeName><Initials>JA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.a.lindeboom@amc.uva.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van Wijk</LastName><ForeName>Arjen J</ForeName><Initials>AJ</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>01</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Denmark</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Oral Implants Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9105713</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0905-7161</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016854" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Anxiety</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000009" MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017063" MajorTopicYN="N">Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010149" MajorTopicYN="N">Pain, Postoperative</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011788" MajorTopicYN="N">Quality of Life</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013313" MajorTopicYN="N">Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000209" MajorTopicYN="N">etiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025321" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013524" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgical Flaps</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>5</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2010</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>6</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20128828</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">CLR1866</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01866.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001982 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001982 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:20128828
|texte= A comparison of two implant techniques on patient-based outcome measures: a report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20128828" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |