Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla.
Identifieur interne : 001751 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001750; suivant : 001752Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla.
Auteurs : Jamil Awad Shibli ; Sauro Grassi ; Adriano Piattelli ; Gabriele E. Pecora ; Daniel S. Ferrari ; Tatiana Onuma ; Susana D'Avila ; Paulo G. Coelho ; Raquel Barros ; Giovanna IezziSource :
- Clinical implant dentistry and related research [ 1708-8208 ] ; 2010.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Acid Etching, Dental, Aged, Bone Density, Calcium Phosphates (analysis), Ceramics, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Male, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Molar, Nanostructures, Osseointegration, Osteocytes, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surface Properties, Torque.
- MESH :
- chemical , analysis : Calcium Phosphates.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- Acid Etching, Dental, Aged, Bone Density, Ceramics, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Implants, Dental Prosthesis Design, Female, Humans, Male, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Molar, Nanostructures, Osseointegration, Osteocytes, Statistics, Nonparametric, Surface Properties, Torque.
Abstract
Physical and bioceramic incorporation surface treatments at the nanometer scale showed higher means of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and torque values compared with surface topography at the micrometer scale; however, the literature concerning the effect of nanometer scale parameters is sparse.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00174.x
PubMed: 19438956
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:19438956Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla.</title><author><name sortKey="Shibli, Jamil Awad" sort="Shibli, Jamil Awad" uniqKey="Shibli J" first="Jamil Awad" last="Shibli">Jamil Awad Shibli</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Division and Head of Oral Implantology Clinic, Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil. jashibli@yahoo.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grassi, Sauro" sort="Grassi, Sauro" uniqKey="Grassi S" first="Sauro" last="Grassi">Sauro Grassi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pecora, Gabriele E" sort="Pecora, Gabriele E" uniqKey="Pecora G" first="Gabriele E" last="Pecora">Gabriele E. Pecora</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrari, Daniel S" sort="Ferrari, Daniel S" uniqKey="Ferrari D" first="Daniel S" last="Ferrari">Daniel S. Ferrari</name></author><author><name sortKey="Onuma, Tatiana" sort="Onuma, Tatiana" uniqKey="Onuma T" first="Tatiana" last="Onuma">Tatiana Onuma</name></author><author><name sortKey="D Avila, Susana" sort="D Avila, Susana" uniqKey="D Avila S" first="Susana" last="D'Avila">Susana D'Avila</name></author><author><name sortKey="Coelho, Paulo G" sort="Coelho, Paulo G" uniqKey="Coelho P" first="Paulo G" last="Coelho">Paulo G. Coelho</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barros, Raquel" sort="Barros, Raquel" uniqKey="Barros R" first="Raquel" last="Barros">Raquel Barros</name></author><author><name sortKey="Iezzi, Giovanna" sort="Iezzi, Giovanna" uniqKey="Iezzi G" first="Giovanna" last="Iezzi">Giovanna Iezzi</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:19438956</idno><idno type="pmid">19438956</idno><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00174.x</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001751</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001751</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla.</title><author><name sortKey="Shibli, Jamil Awad" sort="Shibli, Jamil Awad" uniqKey="Shibli J" first="Jamil Awad" last="Shibli">Jamil Awad Shibli</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Division and Head of Oral Implantology Clinic, Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil. jashibli@yahoo.com</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Grassi, Sauro" sort="Grassi, Sauro" uniqKey="Grassi S" first="Sauro" last="Grassi">Sauro Grassi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Piattelli, Adriano" sort="Piattelli, Adriano" uniqKey="Piattelli A" first="Adriano" last="Piattelli">Adriano Piattelli</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pecora, Gabriele E" sort="Pecora, Gabriele E" uniqKey="Pecora G" first="Gabriele E" last="Pecora">Gabriele E. Pecora</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrari, Daniel S" sort="Ferrari, Daniel S" uniqKey="Ferrari D" first="Daniel S" last="Ferrari">Daniel S. Ferrari</name></author><author><name sortKey="Onuma, Tatiana" sort="Onuma, Tatiana" uniqKey="Onuma T" first="Tatiana" last="Onuma">Tatiana Onuma</name></author><author><name sortKey="D Avila, Susana" sort="D Avila, Susana" uniqKey="D Avila S" first="Susana" last="D'Avila">Susana D'Avila</name></author><author><name sortKey="Coelho, Paulo G" sort="Coelho, Paulo G" uniqKey="Coelho P" first="Paulo G" last="Coelho">Paulo G. Coelho</name></author><author><name sortKey="Barros, Raquel" sort="Barros, Raquel" uniqKey="Barros R" first="Raquel" last="Barros">Raquel Barros</name></author><author><name sortKey="Iezzi, Giovanna" sort="Iezzi, Giovanna" uniqKey="Iezzi G" first="Giovanna" last="Iezzi">Giovanna Iezzi</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><idno type="eISSN">1708-8208</idno><imprint><date when="2010" type="published">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acid Etching, Dental</term><term>Aged</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Calcium Phosphates (analysis)</term><term>Ceramics</term><term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Molar</term><term>Nanostructures</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteocytes</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Torque</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="analysis" xml:lang="en"><term>Calcium Phosphates</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Acid Etching, Dental</term><term>Aged</term><term>Bone Density</term><term>Ceramics</term><term>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</term><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term><term>Dental Implants</term><term>Dental Prosthesis Design</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Maxilla</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Molar</term><term>Nanostructures</term><term>Osseointegration</term><term>Osteocytes</term><term>Statistics, Nonparametric</term><term>Surface Properties</term><term>Torque</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Physical and bioceramic incorporation surface treatments at the nanometer scale showed higher means of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and torque values compared with surface topography at the micrometer scale; however, the literature concerning the effect of nanometer scale parameters is sparse.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">19438956</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>28</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2015</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>19</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1708-8208</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>12</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2010</Year><Month>Dec</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>281-8</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00174.x</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Physical and bioceramic incorporation surface treatments at the nanometer scale showed higher means of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and torque values compared with surface topography at the micrometer scale; however, the literature concerning the effect of nanometer scale parameters is sparse.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="PURPOSE" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two different implant surfaces on the percentage bone-to-implant contact (BIC%) and bone osteocyte density in the human posterior maxilla after 2 months of unloaded healing.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The implants utilized presented dual acid-etched (DAE) surface and a bioceramic molecular impregnated treatment (Ossean®, Intra-Lock International, Boca Raton, FL, USA) serving as control and test, respectively. Ten subjects (59 ± 9 years of age) received two implants (one of each surface) during conventional implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. After the non-loaded period of 2 months, the implants and the surrounding tissue were removed by means of a trephine and were non-decalcified processed for ground sectioning and analysis of BIC%, bone density in threaded area (BA%), and osteocyte index (Oi).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Two DAE implants were found to be clinically unstable at time of retrieval. Histometric evaluation showed significantly higher BIC% and Oi for the test compared to the control surface (p < .05), and that BA% was not significantly different between groups. Wilcoxon matched pairs test was used to compare the differences of histomorphometric variables between implant surfaces. The significance test was conducted at a 5% level of significance.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The histological data suggest that the bioceramic molecular impregnated surface-treated implants positively modulated bone healing at early implantation times compared to the DAE surface.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© 2009, Copyright the Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Shibli</LastName><ForeName>Jamil Awad</ForeName><Initials>JA</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Division and Head of Oral Implantology Clinic, Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil. jashibli@yahoo.com</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Grassi</LastName><ForeName>Sauro</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Piattelli</LastName><ForeName>Adriano</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pecora</LastName><ForeName>Gabriele E</ForeName><Initials>GE</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ferrari</LastName><ForeName>Daniel S</ForeName><Initials>DS</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Onuma</LastName><ForeName>Tatiana</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>d'Avila</LastName><ForeName>Susana</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Coelho</LastName><ForeName>Paulo G</ForeName><Initials>PG</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Barros</LastName><ForeName>Raquel</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Iezzi</LastName><ForeName>Giovanna</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016449">Randomized Controlled Trial</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Clin Implant Dent Relat Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100888977</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1523-0899</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D002130">Calcium Phosphates</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D020099">Coated Materials, Biocompatible</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D015921">Dental Implants</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>97Z1WI3NDX</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C020243">calcium phosphate</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000134" MajorTopicYN="Y">Acid Etching, Dental</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015519" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Density</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002130" MajorTopicYN="N">Calcium Phosphates</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000032" MajorTopicYN="N">analysis</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002516" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ceramics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020099" MajorTopicYN="Y">Coated Materials, Biocompatible</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015921" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implants</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017267" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Prosthesis Design</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008963" MajorTopicYN="N">Molar</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D049329" MajorTopicYN="N">Nanostructures</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016348" MajorTopicYN="Y">Osseointegration</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010011" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteocytes</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018709" MajorTopicYN="N">Statistics, Nonparametric</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013499" MajorTopicYN="N">Surface Properties</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019415" MajorTopicYN="N">Torque</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2009</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2009</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19438956</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">CID174</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00174.x</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001751 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001751 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:19438956
|texte= Histomorphometric evaluation of bioceramic molecular impregnated and dual acid-etched implant surfaces in the human posterior maxilla.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:19438956" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |