EdenteV2, PubMed, Corpus, bibRecord, 001597

Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.

Identifieur interne : 001597 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 001596; suivant : 001598

Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.

Auteurs : Ewoud L. Van Der Mark ; Frank Bierenbroodspot ; Erik M. Baas ; Jan De Lange

Source :

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery [ 1532-1940 ] ; 2011.

RBID : pubmed:20403652

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery), Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods), Bone Plates, Bone Substitutes, Bone Transplantation (methods), Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Jaw, Edentulous (surgery), Male, Maxilla (surgery), Maxillary Diseases (surgery), Maxillary Sinus (surgery), Middle Aged, Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (methods), Osteotomy, Le Fort (instrumentation), Osteotomy, Le Fort (methods).
MESH :
- chemical : Bone Substitutes.
- instrumentation : Osteotomy, Le Fort.
- methods : Alveolar Ridge Augmentation, Bone Transplantation, Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic, Osteotomy, Le Fort.
- surgery : Alveolar Bone Loss, Jaw, Edentulous, Maxilla, Maxillary Diseases, Maxillary Sinus.
- Bone Plates, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Dental Restoration Failure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged.

Abstract

We have evaluated the survival of dental implants in extremely atrophic edentulous maxillas after autogenous bone grafting. We compared two techniques: the Le Fort I down-grafting procedure and conventional raising of the sinus floor with onlay bone grafting. Twenty-seven consecutive patients had their atrophic maxillas reconstructed, 10 of whom were treated with a Le Fort I osteotomy with down-grafting and interpositioning of bone, and 17 by raising the sinus floor and onlay grafts. All implants were placed 5-6 months after grafting. There was no difference in the survival of implants between the two groups. The choice of grafting technique will therefore be based primarily on the interarch relations and the need for soft tissue support.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.03.001
PubMed: 20403652

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:20403652

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Mark, Ewoud L" sort="Van Der Mark, Ewoud L" uniqKey="Van Der Mark E" first="Ewoud L" last="Van Der Mark">Ewoud L. Van Der Mark</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Isala Clinics, GK Zwolle, The Netherlands. elvandermark@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bierenbroodspot, Frank" sort="Bierenbroodspot, Frank" uniqKey="Bierenbroodspot F" first="Frank" last="Bierenbroodspot">Frank Bierenbroodspot</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Baas, Erik M" sort="Baas, Erik M" uniqKey="Baas E" first="Erik M" last="Baas">Erik M. Baas</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Lange, Jan" sort="De Lange, Jan" uniqKey="De Lange J" first="Jan" last="De Lange">Jan De Lange</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:20403652</idno>
<idno type="pmid">20403652</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.03.001</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001597</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001597</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Der Mark, Ewoud L" sort="Van Der Mark, Ewoud L" uniqKey="Van Der Mark E" first="Ewoud L" last="Van Der Mark">Ewoud L. Van Der Mark</name>
<affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Isala Clinics, GK Zwolle, The Netherlands. elvandermark@gmail.com</nlm:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bierenbroodspot, Frank" sort="Bierenbroodspot, Frank" uniqKey="Bierenbroodspot F" first="Frank" last="Bierenbroodspot">Frank Bierenbroodspot</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Baas, Erik M" sort="Baas, Erik M" uniqKey="Baas E" first="Erik M" last="Baas">Erik M. Baas</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="De Lange, Jan" sort="De Lange, Jan" uniqKey="De Lange J" first="Jan" last="De Lange">Jan De Lange</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1532-1940</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss (surgery)</term>
<term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation (methods)</term>
<term>Bone Plates</term>
<term>Bone Substitutes</term>
<term>Bone Transplantation (methods)</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous (surgery)</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Maxilla (surgery)</term>
<term>Maxillary Diseases (surgery)</term>
<term>Maxillary Sinus (surgery)</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
<term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic (methods)</term>
<term>Osteotomy, Le Fort (instrumentation)</term>
<term>Osteotomy, Le Fort (methods)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Substitutes</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Osteotomy, Le Fort</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</term>
<term>Bone Transplantation</term>
<term>Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</term>
<term>Osteotomy, Le Fort</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Alveolar Bone Loss</term>
<term>Jaw, Edentulous</term>
<term>Maxilla</term>
<term>Maxillary Diseases</term>
<term>Maxillary Sinus</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Bone Plates</term>
<term>Chi-Square Distribution</term>
<term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term>
<term>Dental Restoration Failure</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Middle Aged</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We have evaluated the survival of dental implants in extremely atrophic edentulous maxillas after autogenous bone grafting. We compared two techniques: the Le Fort I down-grafting procedure and conventional raising of the sinus floor with onlay bone grafting. Twenty-seven consecutive patients had their atrophic maxillas reconstructed, 10 of whom were treated with a Le Fort I osteotomy with down-grafting and interpositioning of bone, and 17 by raising the sinus floor and onlay grafts. All implants were placed 5-6 months after grafting. There was no difference in the survival of implants between the two groups. The choice of grafting technique will therefore be based primarily on the interarch relations and the need for soft tissue support.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">20403652</PMID>
<DateCompleted><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>08</Month>
<Day>02</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1532-1940</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>49</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>Apr</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>198-202</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.03.001</ELocationID>
<Abstract><AbstractText>We have evaluated the survival of dental implants in extremely atrophic edentulous maxillas after autogenous bone grafting. We compared two techniques: the Le Fort I down-grafting procedure and conventional raising of the sinus floor with onlay bone grafting. Twenty-seven consecutive patients had their atrophic maxillas reconstructed, 10 of whom were treated with a Le Fort I osteotomy with down-grafting and interpositioning of bone, and 17 by raising the sinus floor and onlay grafts. All implants were placed 5-6 months after grafting. There was no difference in the survival of implants between the two groups. The choice of grafting technique will therefore be based primarily on the interarch relations and the need for soft tissue support.</AbstractText>
<CopyrightInformation>Copyright © 2010 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</CopyrightInformation>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>van der Mark</LastName>
<ForeName>Ewoud L</ForeName>
<Initials>EL</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Isala Clinics, GK Zwolle, The Netherlands. elvandermark@gmail.com</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bierenbroodspot</LastName>
<ForeName>Frank</ForeName>
<Initials>F</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Baas</LastName>
<ForeName>Erik M</ForeName>
<Initials>EM</Initials>
</Author>
<Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Lange</LastName>
<ForeName>Jan</ForeName>
<Initials>J</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D018848">Controlled Clinical Trial</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
<ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>04</Month>
<Day>18</Day>
</ArticleDate>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Scotland</Country>
<MedlineTA>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8405235</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0266-4356</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber>
<NameOfSubstance UI="D018786">Bone Substitutes</NameOfSubstance>
</Chemical>
</ChemicalList>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016301" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Bone Loss</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000540" MajorTopicYN="N">Alveolar Ridge Augmentation</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001860" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Plates</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018786" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Substitutes</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016025" MajorTopicYN="N">Bone Transplantation</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D016009" MajorTopicYN="N">Chi-Square Distribution</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019232" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Restoration Failure</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008437" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxilla</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008439" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxillary Diseases</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="N">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008443" MajorTopicYN="N">Maxillary Sinus</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013516" MajorTopicYN="N">Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019340" MajorTopicYN="N">Osteotomy, Le Fort</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="N">instrumentation</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2009</Year>
<Month>07</Month>
<Day>15</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>03</Month>
<Day>04</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year>
<Month>4</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2011</Year>
<Month>8</Month>
<Day>4</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20403652</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="pii">S0266-4356(10)00077-X</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.03.001</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001597 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001597 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:20403652
   |texte=   Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:20403652" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.

Reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla: comparison of two methods.

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki